IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2024v6ip191-198.html

Differences Between Generations: The Sustainable Characteristics Of Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • BEJAN BRINDUSA MARIANA

    (BABES-BOLYAI UNIVERSITY OF CLUJ-NAPOCA, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING DEPARTMENT, CLUJ-NAPOCA, ROMANIA)

  • POP CIPRIAN MARCEL

    (BABES-BOLYAI UNIVERSITY OF CLUJ-NAPOCA, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING DEPARTMENT, CLUJ-NAPOCA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Our society's growth and evolution now place a strong emphasis on sustainability. Sustainable practices ensure a brighter future for future generations in a world with finite resources and adverse environmental effects. Of course, everyone's participation is necessary if there is any prospect for a better world. However, with time, studies have revealed that youngsters are more engaged in neighborhood activities, social responsibility initiatives, and sustainable practices. Starting from these considerations, the article aims to outline a profile of Generation Z, taking into account their constant concern for protecting the environment. Thus, we analyze their attitude towards recycling, their behavior distinct from previous generations, and the factors contributing to shaping this behavior. From a methodological perspective, for this research, we conducted a quantitative survey-based study among members of Generation Z. Following the statistical analysis, the results confirmed our hypothesis that young people exhibit proactive behavior, demonstrating a willingness to engage in the life of their community and participate in actions aimed at conserving the environment. Likewise, through this research, we were able to identify the materials most frequently recycled by young people, as well as the significance of the location for recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Bejan Brindusa Mariana & Pop Ciprian Marcel, 2024. "Differences Between Generations: The Sustainable Characteristics Of Generation Z," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 191-198, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:6i:p:191-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2024-06,%20Volumul%20I/22_Bejan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lavinia Popescu & Adela Sorinela Safta, 2024. "Sustainability From The Perspective Of Electromagnetic Waves - Global System For Mobile Communication," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 249-258, October.
    2. Singh, Ranjit & Sibi, P.S., 2023. "E-loyalty formation of Generation Z: Personal characteristics and social influences," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 3-14.
    3. Arnold Tukker & Bart Jansen, 2006. "Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(3), pages 159-182, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kharrazi, Ali & Sato, Masahiro & Yarime, Masaru & Nakayama, Hirofumi & Yu, Yadong & Kraines, Steven, 2015. "Examining the resilience of national energy systems: Measurements of diversity in production-based and consumption-based electricity in the globalization of trade networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 455-464.
    2. Allwood, Julian M. & Ashby, Michael F. & Gutowski, Timothy G. & Worrell, Ernst, 2011. "Material efficiency: A white paper," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 362-381.
    3. Jiang, Yida & Long, Yin & Liu, Qiaoling & Dowaki, Kiyoshi & Ihara, Tomohiko, 2020. "Carbon emission quantification and decarbonization policy exploration for the household sector - Evidence from 51 Japanese cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Marina Baroni & Giulia Valdrighi & Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni, 2025. "Eco-Sensitive Minds: Clustering Readiness to Change and Environmental Sensitivity for Sustainable Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Jerke W. De Vries, 2018. "Comparing Sustainability to a Good Life and Well-Being: Overlap, Differentiations and Indefinite Overlap," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 1-68, July.
    6. Schaper, Julian & Franks, Max & Koch, Nicolas & Plinke, Charlotte & Sureth, Michael, 2025. "Corrigendum to ”On the emission and distributional effects of a CO2eq-tax on agricultural goods—The case of Germany” [Food Policy 130 (2025) 102794]," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Attahiru, Yusuf Babangida & Aziz, Md. Maniruzzaman A. & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & Shahid, Shamsuddin & Wan Abu Bakar, Wan Azelee & NSashruddin, Thanwa Filza & Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul & Ahamed, Mohd Imra, 2019. "A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 600-613.
    8. Angelica Pianegonda & Sara Favargiotti & Marco Ciolli, 2022. "Rural–Urban Metabolism: A Methodological Approach for Carbon-Positive and Circular Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Karolina Sokal & Magdalena Kachel, 2025. "Impact of Agriculture on Greenhouse Gas Emissions—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-37, April.
    10. Titanilla Oravecz & Laszlo Mucha & Robert Magda & Gedeon Totth & Csaba Bálint Illés, 2020. "Consumers' Preferences for Locally Produced Honey in Hungary," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 407-418.
    11. Mária Csutora & Ágnes Zsóka, 2011. "Maximizing the Efficiency of Greenhouse Gas Related Consumer Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 67-90, March.
    12. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    13. Ala-Mantila, Sanna & Heinonen, Jukka & Junnila, Seppo, 2014. "Relationship between urbanization, direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, and expenditures: A multivariate analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 129-139.
    14. Jui-Che Tu & Yukari Nagai & Min-Chieh Shih, 2018. "Establishing Design Strategies and an Assessment Tool of Home Appliances to Promote Sustainable Behavior for the New Poor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Amir Arabsheybani & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2024. "Optimizing green supply chain for perishable products considering nano-silver packaging under uncertain demand," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 8525-8553, April.
    16. Colin M. Rose & Julia A. Stegemann, 2018. "From Waste Management to Component Management in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Lenzen, Manfred & Steinberger, Julia K., 2013. "Energy requirements of consumption: Urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 696-707.
    18. Chad M. Baum & Christian Gross, 2017. "Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-95, April.
    19. Marianne de Paepe & Laurent Jeanneau & Jerôme Mariette & Olivier Aumont & André Estevez-Torres, 2024. "Purchases dominate the carbon footprint of research laboratories," Post-Print hal-04666497, HAL.
    20. Winter, Eva & Rödiger, Manika & Schneuwly, Jérôme & Gilgen, Anina & Mack, Gabriele, 2024. "Modelling cow longevity policies: Impacts on GHG emissions of the Swiss agricultural sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:6i:p:191-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.