IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2023v1p240-245.html

Evolution Of The Capital Market And Macroeconomics Of An Emerging Market. Case Study For The Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • TROTO (IACOB) ANCA IOANA

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA)

Abstract

The economic and financial state of an emerging European country is undeniably closely related to the evolution and mechanisms that engage the European Union markets. The objective of this paper is to analyze in parallel the macroeconomic and capital market evolution of the Czech Republic, in the context of integration at European level, in order to highlight these connections and compare the path of these indicators with those of other emerging European countries. This paper studies the contagion of emerging markets to events that create inflections of markets at international level, as well as the correlations between the stock market and macroeconomic indices, in order to highlight those factors that lead to a direct influence of the macroeconomic and stock market environment. Through a descriptive analysis of the most relevant capital market indicators and macroeconomics, the study empirically addresses the evolution of the Prague stock exchange in parallel with the economic condition of the Czech Republic, finding similarities and differences in the behavior of these indices. For this analysis, the following indicators were selected: the total value of the traded shares, the number of domestic companies listed on the stock exchange, GDP per Capita, the annual evolution of GDP, the consumer price index, foreign direct investments, net inflows, as well as the current account balance. The study may represent a starting point in a broader analysis of the correlations of the economic and financial mechanisms that are based on the phenomenon of globalization, leading to the determination of common factors that affect the emerging markets in similar stages of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Troto (Iacob) Anca Ioana, 2023. "Evolution Of The Capital Market And Macroeconomics Of An Emerging Market. Case Study For The Czech Republic," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 240-245, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2023:v:1:p:240-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2023-01/29_Troto.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petra Vujakovic, 2010. "How to Measure Globalisation? A New Globalisation Index (NGI)," FIW Working Paper series 046, FIW.
    2. Niklas Potrafke, 2015. "The Evidence on Globalisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 509-552, March.
    3. Anca Ioana Iacob (Troto), 2020. "A Theoretical-conceptual Approach to the Particularities and Functions of the Stock Markets, in the Context of the Pandemic Period," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 948-956, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole Palan & Nadia Simoes & Nuno Crespo, 2021. "Measuring fifty years of trade globalisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1859-1884, June.
    2. Anca Ioana Troto (Iacob), 2021. "Case Study on KOF Globalization Index for Greece, Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Hungary," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 185-192, December.
    3. Savina Gygli & Florian Haelg & Niklas Potrafke & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2019. "Publisher Correction to: The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 575-575, September.
    4. Claudius Gräbner & Philipp Heimberger & Jakob Kapeller & Florian Springholz, 2021. "Understanding economic openness: a review of existing measures," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(1), pages 87-120, February.
    5. Claudius Gräbner & Philipp Heimberger & Jakob Kapeller & Florian Springholz, 2018. "Measuring Economic Openness," wiiw Working Papers 157, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    6. Callaghan, Christian William, 2021. "Consequences of deindustrialisation for globalisation: Insights for international business," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    7. Leal, Patrícia Hipólito & Marques, António Cardoso, 2020. "Rediscovering the EKC hypothesis for the 20 highest CO2 emitters among OECD countries by level of globalization," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 36-47.
    8. Hyeon‐Seung Huh & Cyn‐Young Park, 2021. "A new index of globalisation: Measuring impacts of integration on economic growth and income inequality," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 409-443, February.
    9. Johannes Blum & Klaus Gründler, 2020. "Political Stability and Economic Prosperity: Are Coups Bad for Growth?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8317, CESifo.
    10. Aziz N. Berdiev & Brandon Gomes & James W. Saunoris, 2023. "Revisiting the nexus between globalisation and the shadow economy: Untying the influences of de jure versus de facto globalisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 27-54, January.
    11. Buhari Dogan & Osman Deger, 2016. "How Globalization and Economic Growth Affect Energy Consumption: Panel Data Analysis in the Sample of Brazil, Russia, India, China Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 806-813.
    12. E. Keith Smith & Dennis Kolcava & Thomas Bernauer, 2024. "Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Soponaru Camelia & Bobalca Claudia & Oana Tugulea (Ciobanu), 2013. "Globalization Perspectives In Post-Communist Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 213-218, August.
    14. Sudhanshu K. MISHRA, 2017. "Measuring degree of globalization of African Countries on almost equimarginal contribution principle," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 345-353, December.
    15. Matheus Koengkan & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2022. "The Interactions Between Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Globalisation: Fresh Evidence from the Mercosur Countries," Springer Books, in: Globalisation and Energy Transition in Latin America and the Caribbean, chapter 0, pages 63-99, Springer.
    16. Giray Gözgör & Muhlis Can, 2017. "Causal Linkages among the Product Diversification of Exports, Economic Globalization and Economic Growth," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 888-908, August.
    17. Michael Bleaney & Mo Tian, 2023. "The trade‐GDP ratio as a measure of openness," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 1319-1332, May.
    18. Justina A. V. Fischer, 2015. "Globalized Markets, Globalized Information, and Female Employment: Accounting for Regional Differences in 30 OECD Countries," AIEL Series in Labour Economics, in: Chiara Mussida & Francesco Pastore (ed.), Geographical Labor Market Imbalances, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 283-303, Springer.
    19. Cândida Ferreira, 2020. "Globalisation and Economic Growth: A Panel Data Approach," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 73(2), pages 187-236.
    20. Kossi Ayenagbo & Mamadou Boukari, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Interlinks between Globalization, Governance and Development in African Economic Communities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4318-4338, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2023:v:1:p:240-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.