IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/touwis/v8y2016i2p199-221n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tagestourismus oder Wohnumfeldnutzung?

Author

Listed:
  • Arnberger Arne

    (Institut für Landschaftsentwicklung, Erholungs- und Naturschutzplanung, Department für Raum, Landschaft und Infrastruktur, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Peter Jordan-Straße 82, A-1190 Wien)

  • Eder Renate

    (Institut für Landschaftsentwicklung, Erholungs- und Naturschutzplanung, Department für Raum, Landschaft und Infrastruktur, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Peter Jordan-Straße 82, A-1190 Wien)

  • Preisel Hemma

    (Institut für Landschaftsentwicklung, Erholungs- und Naturschutzplanung, Department für Raum, Landschaft und Infrastruktur, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Peter Jordan-Straße 82, A-1190 Wien)

Abstract

Gästezahlen bilden eine Grundlage für die Berechnung der ökonomischen Wirkungen des Tourismus und für die Entwicklung von Besuchermanagementstrategien der Gebietsverwaltungen. Viele Schutz- und Erholungsgebiete, vor allem jene, die in der Stadt oder am Stadtrand liegen, haben neben der (tages)touristischen auch eine Wohnumfeldfunktion, die zwar ökonomisch betrachtet wenig relevant ist, aber insbesondere für das Gebietsmanagement viele Herausforderungen mit sich bringt. Vorliegende Studie vergleicht drei größere Erholungs- und Schutzgebiete in Wien, deren Besucherstruktur sich aus unterschiedlichen Anteilen an Tagestouristen und BesucherInnen aus dem Wohnumfeld zusammensetzt, hinsichtlich Intensität und zeitlicher Verteilung der Erholungsnutzung. In allen Gebieten wurde mit denselben Besuchererfassungsmethoden (Langzeitzählung, Vor-Ort-Befragung) gearbeitet. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass sich ein hoher Anteil an Tagestouristen in einer stärkeren zeitlichen Konzentration der Erholungsnutzung z. B. im Tages- oder Jahresverlauf manifestiert, während die Erholungsnutzung in Gebieten mit hohem Anteil an Wohnumfeldnutzung ausgeglichener ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnberger Arne & Eder Renate & Preisel Hemma, 2016. "Tagestourismus oder Wohnumfeldnutzung?," Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 199-221, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:touwis:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:199-221:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/tw-2016-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/tw-2016-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/tw-2016-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Balmford & Jonathan M H Green & Michael Anderson & James Beresford & Charles Huang & Robin Naidoo & Matt Walpole & Andrea Manica, 2015. "Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-6, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radisti A. Praptiwi & Carya Maharja & Matt Fortnam & Tomas Chaigneau & Louisa Evans & Leuserina Garniati & Jito Sugardjito, 2021. "Tourism-Based Alternative Livelihoods for Small Island Communities Transitioning towards a Blue Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Min Gon Chung & Tao Pan & Xintong Zou & Jianguo Liu, 2018. "Complex Interrelationships between Ecosystem Services Supply and Tourism Demand: General Framework and Evidence from the Origin of Three Asian Rivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Yingying Qiu & Dan He & Zhe Xu & Xiaoliang Shi, 2023. "The Role of the Forest Recreation Industry in China’s National Economy: An Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Thomas E. Jones, 2022. "Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Rosse Marie Esparza-Huamanchumo & Yefferson Llonto Caicedo & Carla Ethel Gamarra Flores & Pablo Cesar Romo Román & Benoit Mougenot, 2024. "Perceptions of stakeholders and challenges faced by ecotourism management in a natural protected area in Peru," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20757-20780, August.
    6. Sébastien Boillat & Jean-David Gerber & Christoph Oberlack & Julie G. Zaehringer & Chinwe Ifejika Speranza & Stephan Rist, 2018. "Distant Interactions, Power, and Environmental Justice in Protected Area Governance: A Telecoupling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Sinclair, Michael & Ghermandi, Andrea & Signorello, Giovanni & Giuffrida, Laura & De Salvo, Maria, 2022. "Valuing Recreation in Italy's Protected Areas Using Spatial Big Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Adam R. Szromek & Zygmunt Kruczek & Bartłomiej Walas, 2019. "The Attitude of Tourist Destination Residents towards the Effects of Overtourism—Kraków Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Tafesse Estifanos & Maksym Polyakov & Ram Pandit & Atakelty Hailu & Michael Burton, 2021. "What are tourists willing to pay for securing the survival of a flagship species? The case of protection of the Ethiopian wolf," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(1), pages 45-69, February.
    10. Li, Yi & Song, Zhenjiang, 2022. "Have protected areas in China achieved the ecological and economic “win-win” goals? Evidence from the Giant Panda Reserves of the Min Mont Range," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Andrés Vargas Pérez & David Díaz Florián & Tatiana Cantillo, 2020. "Preferences of Prospective Visitors for Nature-Based Recreational Activities in the Salamanca Island Protected Area, Colombia," Documentos Departamento de Economía 18415, Universidad del Norte.
    12. Arnberger, Arne & Eder, Renate & Allex, Brigitte & Preisel, Hemma & Ebenberger, Martin & Husslein, Maria, 2018. "Trade-offs between wind energy, recreational, and bark-beetle impacts on visual preferences of national park visitors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 166-177.
    13. Lishan Xu & Changlin Ao & Baoqi Liu & Zhenyu Cai, 2023. "Ecotourism and sustainable development: a scientometric review of global research trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2977-3003, April.
    14. Roux, Dirk J. & Smith, M. Kyle S. & Smit, Izak P.J. & Freitag, Stefanie & Slabbert, Liandi & Mokhatla, Mohlamatsane M. & Hayes, Jessica & Mpapane, Nelsiwe P., 2020. "Cultural ecosystem services as complex outcomes of people–nature interactions in protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Ciesielski, Mariusz & Stereńczak, Krzysztof, 2021. "Using Flickr data and selected environmental characteristics to analyse the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "Evaluation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: The international collaboration trilemma in interdisciplinary research," OSF Preprints 84j76, Center for Open Science.
    17. Maes, Joachim & Liquete, Camino & Teller, Anne & Erhard, Markus & Paracchini, Maria Luisa & Barredo, José I. & Grizzetti, Bruna & Cardoso, Ana & Somma, Francesca & Petersen, Jan-Erik & Meiner, Andrus , 2016. "An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 14-23.
    18. Hasita Bhammar & Wendy Li & Christel Maria Moller Molina & Valerie Hickey & Jo Pendry & Urvashi Narain, 2021. "Framework for Sustainable Recovery of Tourism in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    19. Philip J. Platts & Marije Schaafsma & R. Kerry Turner & Neil D. Burgess & Brendan Fisher & Boniface P. Mbilinyi & Pantaleo K. T. Munishi & Taylor H. Ricketts & Ruth D. Swetnam & Antje Ahrends & Biniam, 2023. "Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 381-405, November.
    20. Krzysztof Widawski & Piotr Oleśniewicz & Agnieszka Rozenkiewicz & Anna Zaręba & Soňa Jandová, 2020. "Protected Areas: Geotourist Attractiveness for Weekend Tourists Based on the Example of Gorczański National Park in Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:touwis:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:199-221:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.