IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves for Measuring the Quality of Decisions in Cricket

Listed author(s):
  • Manage Ananda B. W.

    (Sam Houston State University)

  • Mallawaarachchi Kumudu

    (Texas Tech University)

  • Wijekularathna Kanchana

    (Sam Houston State University)

Registered author(s):

    A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve visually demonstrates the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity as a function of varying a classification threshold. It is a common practice to use ROC curves to measure the accuracy of predictions by different methods. Although this method has been used primarily in medical and engineering fields, it could be used effectively in sports as well. More precisely, an ROC plots the sensitivity versus (1 - specificity), and the area under the curve gives a measure of the prediction. So, the ideal best prediction should have one square unit of area under the ROC curve, where it achieves both 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity (which, in reality, rarely happens). Consequently, when we compare two methods, the one with the greater area under its ROC is judged best. This paper shows the effectiveness of using the ROC curves in analyzing cricket data. In particular, the quality of the decisions made by umpires is investigated. Also, the comparison of the accuracy of the methods for revising the target for matches shortening due to weather interruptions is the key interest in our investigation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 (April)
    Pages: 1-15

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:6:y:2010:i:2:n:8
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:6:y:2010:i:2:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.