IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v2y2014i2p39n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models

Author

Listed:
  • Petersen Maya

    (Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

  • Schwab Joshua

    (Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

  • Gruber Susan

    (Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Blaser Nello

    (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland)

  • Schomaker Michael

    (Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa)

  • van der Laan Mark

    (Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

Abstract

This paper describes a targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE) for the parameters of longitudinal static and dynamic marginal structural models. We consider a longitudinal data structure consisting of baseline covariates, time-dependent intervention nodes, intermediate time-dependent covariates, and a possibly time-dependent outcome. The intervention nodes at each time point can include a binary treatment as well as a right-censoring indicator. Given a class of dynamic or static interventions, a marginal structural model is used to model the mean of the intervention-specific counterfactual outcome as a function of the intervention, time point, and possibly a subset of baseline covariates. Because the true shape of this function is rarely known, the marginal structural model is used as a working model. The causal quantity of interest is defined as the projection of the true function onto this working model. Iterated conditional expectation double robust estimators for marginal structural model parameters were previously proposed by Robins (2000, 2002) and Bang and Robins (2005). Here we build on this work and present a pooled TMLE for the parameters of marginal structural working models. We compare this pooled estimator to a stratified TMLE (Schnitzer et al. 2014) that is based on estimating the intervention-specific mean separately for each intervention of interest. The performance of the pooled TMLE is compared to the performance of the stratified TMLE and the performance of inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators using simulations. Concepts are illustrated using an example in which the aim is to estimate the causal effect of delayed switch following immunological failure of first line antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected patients. Data from the International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS, Southern Africa are analyzed to investigate this question using both TML and IPW estimators. Our results demonstrate practical advantages of the pooled TMLE over an IPW estimator for working marginal structural models for survival, as well as cases in which the pooled TMLE is superior to its stratified counterpart.

Suggested Citation

  • Petersen Maya & Schwab Joshua & Gruber Susan & Blaser Nello & Schomaker Michael & van der Laan Mark, 2014. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 147-185, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:39:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2013-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2013-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2013-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murphy S.A. & van der Laan M.J. & Robins J.M., 2001. "Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1410-1423, December.
    2. Sally Picciotto & Miguel A. Hernán & John H. Page & Jessica G. Young & James M. Robins, 2012. "Structural Nested Cumulative Failure Time Models to Estimate the Effects of Interventions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 886-900, September.
    3. Heejung Bang & James M. Robins, 2005. "Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 962-973, December.
    4. James Robins & Andrea Rotnitzky & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2007. "Discussions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 650-653, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristin A. Linn & Eric B. Laber & Leonard A. Stefanski, 2017. "Interactive -Learning for Quantiles," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 638-649, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Bradic & Weijie Ji & Yuqian Zhang, 2021. "High-dimensional Inference for Dynamic Treatment Effects," Papers 2110.04924, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    2. Ruben Dezeure & Peter Bühlmann & Cun-Hui Zhang, 2017. "Rejoinder on: High-dimensional simultaneous inference with the bootstrap," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 751-758, December.
    3. Yuqian Zhang & Weijie Ji & Jelena Bradic, 2021. "Dynamic treatment effects: high-dimensional inference under model misspecification," Papers 2111.06818, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    4. Ashesh Rambachan & Neil Shephard, 2019. "When do common time series estimands have nonparametric causal meaning?," Papers 1903.01637, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    5. van der Laan Mark J., 2014. "Causal Inference for a Population of Causally Connected Units," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 13-74, March.
    6. Gustafson Paul, 2012. "Double-Robust Estimators: Slightly More Bayesian than Meets the Eye?," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Rosenblum Michael & van der Laan Mark J., 2010. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameter of a Marginal Structural Model," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Matthew Blackwell & Anton Strezhnev, 2022. "Telescope matching for reducing model dependence in the estimation of the effects of time‐varying treatments: An application to negative advertising," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 377-399, January.
    9. Fengying Li & Yuqiang Li & Xianyi Wu, 2024. "Minimax weight learning for absorbing MDPs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3545-3582, August.
    10. Lucia Babino & Andrea Rotnitzky & James Robins, 2019. "Multiple robust estimation of marginal structural mean models for unconstrained outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 90-99, March.
    11. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Zhao, Jun, 2020. "Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 101-122.
    12. Ruoxuan Xiong & Allison Koenecke & Michael Powell & Zhu Shen & Joshua T. Vogelstein & Susan Athey, 2021. "Federated Causal Inference in Heterogeneous Observational Data," Papers 2107.11732, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    13. Han, Sukjin, 2021. "Identification in nonparametric models for dynamic treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 132-147.
    14. Görg Holger & Marchal Léa, 2019. "Die Effekte deutscher Direktinvestitionen im Empfängerland vor dem Hintergrund des Leistungsbilanzüberschusses: Empirische Evidenz mit Mikrodaten für Frankreich," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 53-69, June.
    15. Tran Linh & Petersen Maya & Schwab Joshua & van der Laan Mark J., 2023. "Robust variance estimation and inference for causal effect estimation," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Léa Marchal & Clément Nedoncelle, 2019. "Immigrants, occupations and firm export performance," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 1480-1509, November.
    17. Hisaki Kono & Yasuyuki Sawada & Abu S. Shonchoy, 2016. "DVD-based Distance-learning Program for University Entrance Exams: Experimental Evidence from Rural Bangladesh," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1027, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    18. Masahiro Kato & Masaaki Imaizumi & Takuya Ishihara & Toru Kitagawa, 2023. "Asymptotically Optimal Fixed-Budget Best Arm Identification with Variance-Dependent Bounds," Papers 2302.02988, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    19. Takahiro Hoshino & Yuya Shimizu, 2019. "Doubly Robust-type Estimation of Population Moments and Parameters in Biased Sampling," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2019-006, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    20. Hamsa Bastani & David Simchi-Levi & Ruihao Zhu, 2022. "Meta Dynamic Pricing: Transfer Learning Across Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1865-1881, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:39:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.