IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v107y2012i499p886-900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Nested Cumulative Failure Time Models to Estimate the Effects of Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Picciotto
  • Miguel A. Hernán
  • John H. Page
  • Jessica G. Young
  • James M. Robins

Abstract

In the presence of time-varying confounders affected by prior treatment, standard statistical methods for failure time analysis may be biased. Methods that correctly adjust for this type of covariate include the parametric g-formula, inverse probability weighted estimation of marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models, and g-estimation of structural nested accelerated failure time models. In this article, we propose a novel method to estimate the causal effect of a time-dependent treatment on failure in the presence of informative right-censoring and time-dependent confounders that may be affected by past treatment: g-estimation of structural nested cumulative failure time models (SNCFTMs). An SNCFTM considers the conditional effect of a final treatment at time m on the outcome at each later time k by modeling the ratio of two counterfactual cumulative risks at time k under treatment regimes that differ only at time m . Inverse probability weights are used to adjust for informative censoring. We also present a procedure that, under certain “no-interaction” conditions, uses the g-estimates of the model parameters to calculate unconditional cumulative risks under nondynamic (static) treatment regimes. The procedure is illustrated with an example using data from a longitudinal cohort study, in which the “treatments” are healthy behaviors and the outcome is coronary heart disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Picciotto & Miguel A. Hernán & John H. Page & Jessica G. Young & James M. Robins, 2012. "Structural Nested Cumulative Failure Time Models to Estimate the Effects of Interventions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 886-900, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:499:p:886-900
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.682532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2012.682532
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2012.682532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torben Martinussen & Stijn Vansteelandt & Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen & David M. Zucker, 2017. "Instrumental variables estimation of exposure effects on a time‐to‐event endpoint using structural cumulative survival models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1140-1149, December.
    2. Petersen Maya & Schwab Joshua & van der Laan Mark & Gruber Susan & Blaser Nello & Schomaker Michael, 2014. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-39, September.
    3. Shaun Seaman & Oliver Dukes & Ruth Keogh & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2020. "Adjusting for time‐varying confounders in survival analysis using structural nested cumulative survival time models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 472-483, June.
    4. Yasuhiro Hagiwara & Tomohiro Shinozaki & Yutaka Matsuyama, 2020. "G‐estimation of structural nested restricted mean time lost models to estimate effects of time‐varying treatments on a failure time outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 799-810, September.
    5. Oliver Dukes & Torben Martinussen & Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2019. "On doubly robust estimation of the hazard difference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 100-109, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:499:p:886-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.