IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v8y2013i1p19-41n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic Service and Gender Equality: An Unavoidable Problem for the Feminist Debate on Basic Income

Author

Listed:
  • Vollenweider Camila

    () (Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Argentina)

Abstract

The debate on the desirability of a Basic Income (BI) for women has polarized between those who defend the measure as a way of reducing gender inequalities and those who believe that the policy could worsen the gender gap. This article argues for the former position, introducing the problem of domestic service, a paradigm of inequality not only between the genders but also among women. First, different dimensions of the “domestic service problem” are discussed in order to challenge the view that domestic service could be a “solution” for some gender inequalities. Second, it is argued that BI could significantly reduce outsourcing of reproductive work (at least in the private sphere) and could encourage women to demand equality in the home and a better public provision of care services. These effects of a BI could lead to a fairer overall system in terms of gender and class.

Suggested Citation

  • Vollenweider Camila, 2013. "Domestic Service and Gender Equality: An Unavoidable Problem for the Feminist Debate on Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 19-41, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:19-41:n:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bis.2013.8.issue-1/bis-2012-0008/bis-2012-0008.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gheaus Anca, 2008. "Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-8, December.
    2. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp17 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:19-41:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.