IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v71y2019i5p63-76.html

Considerations Regarding The Measurement Of Social Impact Vs The Institution Of Social Entrepreneurship And Conflict Of Interest According To Regulation (Eu) 2019-819

Author

Listed:
  • POPESCU Lavinia

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • SAFTA Adela Sorinela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The article addresses the institution of social entrepreneurship from the perspective of Regulation (EU) no. 346/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2013 on European social entrepreneurship funds, reaffirmed by the importance of the need to supplement Regulation (EU) no. 346/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on conflicts of interest, measuring the social impact and informing the investors in the field of European social entrepreneurship funds. The measures are aimed at protecting the interests of the eligible social entrepreneurship fund or its investors. These measures should include informing the senior management or other competent internal body about the eligible social entrepreneurship fund and making the decisions or taking the necessary actions to act in the interest of the eligible social entrepreneurship fund or its investors. The importance of ensuring the legal certainty of the rights, as well as the obligations of the managers of the entrepreneurship funds and their active role in the management of the companies in which they invest the eligible social entrepreneurship funds are those that we will address in the thematic article in the following.

Suggested Citation

  • POPESCU Lavinia & SAFTA Adela Sorinela, 2019. "Considerations Regarding The Measurement Of Social Impact Vs The Institution Of Social Entrepreneurship And Conflict Of Interest According To Regulation (Eu) 2019-819," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 71(5), pages 63-76, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:71:y:2019:i:5:p:63-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/71506popescu&safta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Larrinaga & Francisco Carrasco & Carmen Correa & Fernando Llena & Jose Moneva, 2002. "Accountability and accounting regulation: the case of the Spanish environmental disclosure standard," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 723-740.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patten, Dennis M., 2005. "The accuracy of financial report projections of future environmental capital expenditures: a research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 457-468, July.
    2. Mohammad Dulal Miah & Syed Mahbubur Rahman & Mahreen Mamoon, 2021. "Green banking: the case of commercial banking sector in Oman," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2681-2697, February.
    3. Marco Papa & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala & Anna Losa & Aleksandra Swałek, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Regulation on Environmental Decoupling—An Exploratory Study on Polish Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Peter Neergaard & Janni Thusgaard Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz, 2013. "Conformance and Deviance: Company Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6), pages 357-373, September.
    5. Ahmad, Nglaa & Haque, Shamima & Islam, Muhammad Azizul, 2024. "Modern slavery disclosure regulations in the global supply Chain: A world-systems perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Veronica P. Lima Ribeiro & Cristina Aibar‐Guzman, 2010. "Determinants of environmental accounting practices in local entities: evidence from Portugal," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 404-419, August.
    7. Jeanne Amar & Samira Demaria & Sandra Rigot, 2019. "What motivates CAC 40 companies to disclose information on climate-related financial risks?," Post-Print halshs-02407125, HAL.
    8. Katharina Hombach & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2019. "Shaping Corporate Actions Through Targeted Transparency Regulation: A Framework and Review of Extant Evidence," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 71(2), pages 137-168, May.
    9. Guidry, Ronald P. & Patten, Dennis M., 2012. "Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 81-90.
    10. Frank Hubers & Thomas Thijssens, 2023. "Protect, respect, remedy, and report? Development of human rights reporting in the context of formal institutional settings," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2783-2798, November.
    11. Alvarez Etxeberria, Igor & Garayar, Ainhoa & Calvo Sánchez, José Antonio, 2015. "Development of sustainability reports for farming operations in the Basque Country using the Delphi method," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 44-54.
    12. Cecília Carmo & Cristiana Ribeiro, 2022. "Mandatory Non-Financial Information Disclosure under European Directive 95/2014/EU: Evidence from Portuguese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Despina Galani & Efthymios Gravas & Antonios Stavropoulos, 2012. "Company Characteristics and Environmental Policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 236-247, May.
    14. Parker, Lee D., 2011. "Twenty-one years of social and environmental accountability research: A coming of age," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-10.
    15. Carlos Larrinaga-Gonzélez & Vincente Pérez-Chamorro, 2008. "Sustainability Accounting and Accountability in Public Water Companies," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 337-343, December.
    16. Teresa Eugénio & Isabel Costa Lourenço & Ana Isabel Morais, 2010. "Recent developments in social and environmental accounting research," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 286-305, June.
    17. de Villiers, Charl & Dumay, John & Farneti, Federica & Jia, Jing & Li, Zhongtian, 2025. "Reprint of: Does mandating corporate social and environmental disclosure improve social and environmental performance?: Broad-based evidence regarding the effectiveness of directive 2014/95/EU," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    18. Marisa Agostini & Ericka Costa, 2012. "Mandatory disclosure about environmental and employee matters in Italian listed corporate groups' reports," Working Papers 6, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    19. Michel Coulmont & Sylvie Berthelot & Vincent Gagné, 2022. "Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Rachel N. Birkey & Ronald P. Guidry & Mohammad Azizul Islam & Dennis M. Patten, 2018. "Mandated Social Disclosure: An Analysis of the Response to the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 827-841, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:71:y:2019:i:5:p:63-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.