IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v65y2013i1p164-173.html

Some Intercultural Considerations On Corporate Social Responsibility - Case Study: Romania And Hofstede'S Cultural Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • BALTADOR Lia

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu)

  • BUDAC Camelia

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu)

  • BELASCU Lucian

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu)

Abstract

Globalization is creating the need for new ways of understanding, managing and coping with culture differences. Corporations should take into account these differences when fundamenting their international strategies, even in regard to their business ethic and social responsibility goals. In this article we try to indicate some of the implications that intercultural factors can have on the companies actions regarding CSR.

Suggested Citation

  • BALTADOR Lia & BUDAC Camelia & BELASCU Lucian, 2013. "Some Intercultural Considerations On Corporate Social Responsibility - Case Study: Romania And Hofstede'S Cultural Dimensions," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 65(1), pages 164-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:65:y:2013:i:1:p:164-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/65113baltador&budac&belascu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nada K. Kakabadse & Cecile Rozuel & Linda Lee-Davies, 2005. "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 277-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. BALTADOR Lia & BUDAC Camelia, 2014. "Intercultural Communication Barriers – An Interpersonal Approach," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 66(1), pages 28-36.
    2. Rodica Cristina Butnaru & Alexandru Anichiti & Gina Ionela Butnaru & Alina Petronela Haller, 2020. "Heavy Work Investment from the Perspective of Cultural Factors and Outcomes by Types of Investors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1159-1159, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanescu Florica & Bekesi Delia, 2015. "Value And Change In Economy," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 265-273, December.
    2. Chang Liu & Shouming Chen & Qiuyue Shao, 2019. "Do CEO Rhetorical Strategies Affect Corporate Social Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Robert Strand & R. Freeman, 2015. "Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 65-85, March.
    4. Ramani, Shyama & Mukherjee, Vivekananda, 2010. "CSR and market changing product innovations: Indian case studies," MERIT Working Papers 2010-026, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Alice Klettner & Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma, 2014. "The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 145-165, June.
    6. György Ligeti & Ágnes Oravecz, 2009. "CSR Communication of Corporate Enterprises in Hungary," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 137-149, January.
    7. Lars Moratis & Satu Brandt, 2017. "Corporate stakeholder responsiveness? Exploring the state and quality of GRI‐based stakeholder engagement disclosures of European firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 312-325, July.
    8. Nazamul Hoque & Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman & Rafiqul Islam Molla & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman & Mohammad Zahid Hossain Bhuiyan, 2018. "Is corporate social responsibility pursuing pristine business goals for sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1130-1142, November.
    9. Szabolcs Nagy & Mariann Veresne Somosi, 2020. "Students’ Perceptions of Sustainable Universities in Hungary: An Importance-Performance Analysis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(54), pages 496-496, April.
    10. Wang, Zi & Zheng, Dechang, 2025. "Media heterogeneity and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Rosane Maria Seibert & Clea Beatriz Macagnan & Robert Dixon, 2021. "Priority Stakeholders’ Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Gang Tian & Gabriel Dodzi Pekyi & Haojia Chen & Huaping Sun & Xiaoling Wang, 2021. "Sustainability-Conscious Stakeholders and CSR: Evidence from IJVs of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Elena Platonova & Mehmet Asutay & Rob Dixon & Sabri Mohammad, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 451-471, August.
    14. Laura J. Noval & Günter K. Stahl, 2017. "Accounting for Proscriptive and Prescriptive Morality in the Workplace: The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Mood on Managerial Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 589-602, May.
    15. Park, Byung Il & Cave, Adam H., 2018. "Corporate social responsibility in international joint ventures: Empirical examinations in South Korea," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1213-1228.
    16. Gupta, Suraksha & Czinkota, Michael & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Embedding knowledge and value of a brand into sustainability for differentiation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 287-296.
    17. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    18. Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati, 2009. "Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 339-353, April.
    19. Jitka Srpová & Vilém Kunz & Jan Mísař, 2012. "Applying The Principles of CSR in Enterprises in The Czech Republic," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(4), pages 44-57.
    20. Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Anna Anastasopoulou & Panagiotis Trivellas, 2023. "Employee Performance Implications of CSR for Organizational Resilience in the Banking Industry: The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:65:y:2013:i:1:p:164-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.