IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v63y2009i2p149-182.html

Class‐specific tests of spatial segregation based on nearest neighbor contingency tables

Author

Listed:
  • Elvan Ceyhan

Abstract

The spatial interaction between two or more classes might cause multivariate clustering patterns such as segregation or association, which can be tested using a nearest neighbor contingency table (NNCT). The null hypothesis is randomness in the nearest neighbor structure, which may result from random labeling (RL) or complete spatial randomness of points from two or more classes (which is henceforth called CSR independence). We consider Dixon's class‐specific segregation test and introduce a new class‐specific test, which is a new decomposition of Dixon's overall chi‐squared segregation statistic. We analyze the distributional properties and compare the empirical significant levels and power estimates of the tests using extensive Monte Carlo simulations. We demonstrate that the new class‐specific tests have comparable performance with the currently available tests based on NNCTs. For illustrative purposes, we use three example data sets and provide guidelines for using these tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvan Ceyhan, 2009. "Class‐specific tests of spatial segregation based on nearest neighbor contingency tables," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(2), pages 149-182, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:63:y:2009:i:2:p:149-182
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00414.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00414.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00414.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulldorff, Martin, 2006. "Tests of Spatial Randomness Adjusted for an Inhomogeneity: A General Framework," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1289-1305, September.
    2. M. N. M. Van Lieshout & A. J. Baddeley, 1999. "Indices of Dependence Between Types in Multivariate Point Patterns," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 511-532, December.
    3. A. J. Baddeley & J. Møller & R. Waagepetersen, 2000. "Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 54(3), pages 329-350, November.
    4. Martin Schlather & Paulo J. Ribeiro & Peter J. Diggle, 2004. "Detecting dependence between marks and locations of marked point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 79-93, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barry Kronenfeld & Timothy Leslie, 2015. "Restricted random labeling: testing for between-group interaction after controlling for joint population and within-group spatial structure," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Elvan Ceyhan, 2010. "New Tests of Spatial Segregation Based on Nearest Neighbour Contingency Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 147-165, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elvan Ceyhan, 2010. "New Tests of Spatial Segregation Based on Nearest Neighbour Contingency Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 147-165, March.
    2. Ceyhan, Elvan, 2009. "Overall and pairwise segregation tests based on nearest neighbor contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2786-2808, June.
    3. Jakub Staněk & Ondřej Šedivý & Viktor Beneš, 2014. "On Random Marked Sets with a Smaller Integer Dimension," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 397-410, June.
    4. Carlos Comas & Jorge Mateu & Aila Särkkä, 2010. "A third‐order point process characteristic for multi‐type point processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 64(1), pages 19-44, February.
    5. Isabelle M. Nilsson & Oleg A. Smirnov, 2017. "Clustering vs. relative location: Measuring spatial interaction between retail outlets," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 721-741, November.
    6. Arbia, Giuseppe & Espa, Giuseppe & Giuliani, Diego & Mazzitelli, Andrea, 2010. "Detecting the existence of space-time clustering of firms," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 311-323, September.
    7. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    8. Giuseppe Espa & Giuseppe Arbia & Diego Giuliani, 2013. "Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-50, January.
    9. Edith Gabriel & Peter J. Diggle, 2009. "Second‐order analysis of inhomogeneous spatio‐temporal point process data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(1), pages 43-51, February.
    10. Jalilian, Abdollah, 2016. "On the higher order product density functions of a Neyman–Scott cluster point process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 144-150.
    11. Arbia, Giuseppe & Espa, Giuseppe & Giuliani, Diego & Dickson, Maria Michela, 2014. "Spatio-temporal clustering in the pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing industry: A geographical micro-level analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 298-304.
    12. Peng Shi & Glenn M. Fung & Daniel Dickinson, 2022. "Assessing hail risk for property insurers with a dependent marked point process," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 302-328, January.
    13. Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla & Vasiliki Eirini Chatzea & Elpiniki Frouzi & Enkeleint A. Mechili & Georgia Pistolla & George Nikiforidis & Vassilis Georgoulias & Christos Lionis & Nikos Tzanakis, 2022. "Evidence-Based Conceptual Collection of Methods for Spatial Epidemiology and Analysis to Enhance Cancer Surveillance and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    14. Kateřina Koňasová & Jiří Dvořák, 2021. "Stochastic Reconstruction for Inhomogeneous Point Patterns," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 527-547, June.
    15. Ottmar Cronie & Julia Jansson & Konstantinos Konstantinou, 2024. "Discussion of the Paper “Marked Spatial Point Processes: Current State and Extensions to Point Processes on Linear Networks”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(2), pages 379-388, June.
    16. Redenbach, Claudia & Särkkä, Aila, 2013. "Parameter estimation for growth interaction processes using spatio-temporal information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 672-683.
    17. Saltré, F. & Chuine, I. & Brewer, S. & Gaucherel, C., 2009. "A phenomenological model without dispersal kernel to model species migration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3546-3554.
    18. Yongtao Guan, 2008. "Variance estimation for statistics computed from inhomogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 175-190, February.
    19. Jesper Møller & Håkon Toftaker, 2014. "Geometric Anisotropic Spatial Point Pattern Analysis and Cox Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(2), pages 414-435, June.
    20. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:63:y:2009:i:2:p:149-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.