IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v95y2014i5p1381-1398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Fraud Prevention and Electoral Participation: Attitudes Toward Voter Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Lonna Rae Atkeson
  • R. Michael Alvarez
  • Thad E. Hall
  • J. Andrew Sinclair

Abstract

type="main"> This article examines public opinion on the effectiveness and consequences of voter identification laws, focusing on the core issue in the Supreme Court's reasoning in the 2008 case that upheld an Indiana photo-ID law, Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. We use a unique survey from New Mexico, where voter identification policies have recently undergone important changes. Questions in the survey examine whether voters think that ID laws protect against fraud and prevent legitimate participation, which point of view voters find more compelling, and whether attitudes toward voter identification are related to voter confidence. Most voters think that voter ID laws prevent fraud, but many voters think that ensuring access to the polls is more important than preventing fraud. Among other variables that explain differences among individuals, partisanship plays an important role. The framing of voter identification policies plays an important role in how such laws are interpreted by the public and Republicans are especially concerned about fraud in elections.

Suggested Citation

  • Lonna Rae Atkeson & R. Michael Alvarez & Thad E. Hall & J. Andrew Sinclair, 2014. "Balancing Fraud Prevention and Electoral Participation: Attitudes Toward Voter Identification," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1381-1398, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:95:y:2014:i:5:p:1381-1398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ssqu.12110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atkeson, Lonna Rae & Adams, Alex N. & Alvarez, R. Michael, 2014. "Nonresponse and Mode Effects in Self- and Interviewer-Administered Surveys," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 304-320, July.
    2. Cobb, Rachael V. & Greiner, D. James & Quinn, Kevin M., 2012. "Can Voter ID Laws Be Administered in a Race-Neutral Manner? Evidence from the City of Boston in 2008," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, March.
    3. repec:cup:apsrev:v:23:y:1929:i:04:p:908-914_11 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:cup:apsrev:v:3:y:1909:i:01:p:62-63_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. Michael Alvarez & Jian Cao & Yimeng Li, 2021. "Voting Experiences, Perceptions of Fraud, and Voter Confidence," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1225-1238, July.
    2. Brian Fogarty & David Kimball & Lea Kosnik, 2016. "The Media, Voter Fraud, and the 2012 Elections," Working Papers 1012, University of Missouri-St. Louis, Department of Economics.
    3. Russell Weaver, 2015. "Can Voter Identification Laws Increase Electoral Participation in the United States? Probably Not—A Simple Model of the Voting Market," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip S. Brenner, 2021. "Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(2), pages 939-954, March.
    2. Mühlböck Monika & Steiber Nadia & Kittel Bernhard, 2017. "Less Supervision, More Satisficing? Comparing Completely Self-Administered Web-Surveys and Interviews Under Controlled Conditions," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 13-28, October.
    3. Pirmin Fessler & Maximilian Kasy & Peter Lindner, 2018. "Survey mode effects on measured income inequality," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(4), pages 487-505, December.
    4. Francesco Maria Esposito & Diego Focanti & Justine S. Hastings, 2019. "Effects of Photo ID Laws on Registration and Turnout: Evidence from Rhode Island," NBER Working Papers 25503, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Almut Schumann & Detlev Lück, 2023. "Better to ask online when it concerns intimate relationships? Survey mode differences in the assessment of relationship quality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(22), pages 609-640.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:95:y:2014:i:5:p:1381-1398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.