A Common Monetary Standard or a Common Currency for Europe? Fiscal Lessons from the United States
In a federal system, a common currency controlled by the central government (or some other outside agent) enhances the economic benefits from merchantile competition among lower governments because it hardens their budget constraints. Among American states, tax and regulatory competition generally improves resource allocation, i.e., it is 'market-preserving.' Because a common currency in Europe is not feasible, unrestricted horizontal mercantile competition among European nation states is less benign and may worsen resource allocation. Copyright 1994 by Scottish Economic Society.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 41 (1994)
Issue (Month): 4 (November)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0036-9292|
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0036-9292|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:41:y:1994:i:4:p:337-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.