IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v28y2019i7p1603-1620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Provision and Pricing in the Presence of Consumer Search Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Liu
  • William L. Cooper
  • Zizhuo Wang

Abstract

Should a seller make information about its products readily accessible to customers, so that customers do not have to incur any substantive cost—in terms of time and effort—to learn about those products? To help answer this question, we consider a monopolist selling two substitute products to a population of customers, who have differing tastes about the products. Each customer a priori has uncertainty about whether or not he will like each of the products. The seller may choose to make product information easily accessible, thereby allowing customers to resolve their uncertainties for free. Otherwise, customers may conduct research to resolve their uncertainties by incurring a search cost before making purchase decisions. We consider three “information structures” differing in whether the seller makes information about the products freely accessible or not. Our primary objective is to determine which structure gives the seller the highest revenue, while accounting for the seller’s pricing decisions as well as the induced customer responses to both the information structure and prices. We find that if each customer’s uncertainties are small in magnitude but highly positively correlated, then withholding both products’ information is the best for the seller. If the uncertainties are small in magnitude and negatively correlated, then providing one product’s information but not the other’s is the best. If the uncertainties are large in magnitude and positively correlated, then providing both products’ information is the best. We also show that when the correlation is negative, withholding both products’ information cannot be optimal. In addition, we also analyze various extensions of the model. These include a variant in which customers’ research is imperfect and may yield incorrect information to the customers, and a variant in which each customer’s uncertainty about a product can be decomposed into multiple uncertainties associated with individual attributes of the product.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Liu & William L. Cooper & Zizhuo Wang, 2019. "Information Provision and Pricing in the Presence of Consumer Search Costs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1603-1620, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:7:p:1603-1620
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Guangxia & Gong, Yeming & Hong, Xianpei, 2022. "Free rider effect of quality information disclosure in remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Xianpei Hong & Xinlu Cao & Yeming Gong & Wanying (amanda) Chen, 2021. "Quality information acquisition and disclosure with green manufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain," Post-Print hal-03188234, HAL.
    3. Zheng, Hong & Wu, Huamin & Tian, Lin, 2022. "Healthcare service enhancement with patient search," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 398-409.
    4. Han Zhu & Yimin Yu & Saibal Ray, 2021. "Quality Disclosure Strategy under Customer Learning Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1136-1153, April.
    5. Cenying Yang & Yihao Feng & Andrew Whinston, 2022. "Dynamic Pricing and Information Disclosure for Fresh Produce: An Artificial Intelligence Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 155-171, January.
    6. Hong, Xianpei & Cao, Xinlu & Gong, Yeming & Chen, Wanying, 2021. "Quality information acquisition and disclosure with green manufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Fan, Huirong & Khouja, Moutaz & Gao, Jie & Zhou, Jing, 2023. "Incorporating social learning into the optimal return and pricing decisions of online retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:7:p:1603-1620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.