IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v27y2018i12p2291-2312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing Risk‐Adjusted Therapy for Patients with Hypertension

Author

Listed:
  • Manaf Zargoush
  • Mehmet Gümüş
  • Vedat Verter
  • Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Abstract

Limited guidance is available for providing patient‐specific care to hypertensive patients, although this chronic condition is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. To address this issue, we develop an analytical model that takes into account the most relevant risk factors including age, sex, blood pressure, diabetes status, smoking habits, and blood cholesterol. Using the Markov Decision Process framework, we develop a model to maximize expected quality‐adjusted life years, as well as characterize the optimal sequence and combination of antihypertensive medications. Assuming the physician uses the standard medication dose for each drug, and the patient fully adheres to the prescribed treatment regimen, we prove that optimal treatment policies exhibit a threshold structure. Our findings indicate that our recommended thresholds vary by age and other patient characteristics, for example (1) the optimal thresholds for all medication prescription are nonincreasing in age, and (2) the medications need to be prescribed at lower thresholds for males who smoke than for males who have diabetes. The improvements in quality‐adjusted life years associated with our model compare favorably with those obtained by following the British Hypertension Society's guideline, and the gains increase with the severity of risk factors. For instance, in both genders (although at different rates), diabetic patients gain more than non‐diabetic patients. Our sensitivity analysis results indicate that the optimal thresholds decrease if the medications have lower side‐effects and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Manaf Zargoush & Mehmet Gümüş & Vedat Verter & Stella S. Daskalopoulou, 2018. "Designing Risk‐Adjusted Therapy for Patients with Hypertension," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(12), pages 2291-2312, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:27:y:2018:i:12:p:2291-2312
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.12872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12872
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.12872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Heng & Liu, Zixian & Li, Mei & Liang, Lijun, 2022. "Optimal monitoring policies for chronic diseases under healthcare warranty," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Naumzik, Christof & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Nielsen, Anne Molgaard, 2023. "Data-driven dynamic treatment planning for chronic diseases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 853-867.
    3. Sun, Huan & Wang, Haiyan & Steffensen, Sonja, 2022. "Mechanism design of multi-strategy health insurance plans under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Ghazalbash, Somayeh & Zargoush, Manaf & Mowbray, Fabrice & Costa, Andrew, 2022. "Impact of multimorbidity and frailty on adverse outcomes among older delayed discharge patients: Implications for healthcare policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 197-206.
    5. Anthony Bonifonte & Turgay Ayer & Benjamin Haaland, 2022. "An Analytics Approach to Guide Randomized Controlled Trials in Hypertension Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6634-6647, September.
    6. Wesley J. Marrero & Mariel S. Lavieri & Jeremy B. Sussman, 2021. "Optimal cholesterol treatment plans and genetic testing strategies for cardiovascular diseases," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:27:y:2018:i:12:p:2291-2312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.