Author
Listed:
- Vincenzo Scoppa
- Idola Francesca Spanò
Abstract
Gender gaps in labor market outcomes have traditionally been attributed to differences in individual productivity or to discrimination. More recently, however, several studies have documented the role of gender differences in psychological attitudes. To shed light on this issue, rather than using data on realized wages, we rely on data on reservation wages—the lowest wage workers are willing to accept—for a sample of Italian graduates. Reservation wages tend to reflect individual attitudes and beliefs more directly, while being less affected by employer discrimination. Using a descriptive approach, we first examine the association between reservation wages and educational background, academic performance, individual characteristics, and family background, and investigate how they depend on job seekers' labor market expectations. We then analyze how reservation wages depend on preferences over specific job attributes, such as part‐time arrangements, permanent positions, geographical mobility, commuting time, etc. Applying the Gelbach decomposition to quantify the contribution of each group of factors, we find a substantial role for preferences for job attributes and labor market expectations. However, our estimates reveal a large unexplained component which—in line with recent studies—is likely driven by gender differences in psychological and social attitudes, such as risk aversion, overconfidence, and adherence to social norms.
Suggested Citation
Vincenzo Scoppa & Idola Francesca Spanò, 2026.
"Do Women Ask for Less? Evidence From Reservation Wages in Italy,"
LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 40(3), pages 216-237, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:labour:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:216-237
DOI: 10.1111/labr.70025
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:216-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.