IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v75y2024i3p324-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phenomenon‐based classification: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Gnoli
  • Richard P. Smiraglia
  • Rick Szostak

Abstract

While bibliographic classifications are traditionally based on disciplines, the logical alternative is phenomenon‐based classification. Although not prevalent, this approach has been explored in the 20th century by J.D. Brown, the Classification Research Group, and others. Its principles have been stated in the León Manifesto (2007) and are currently represented by such general schemes as the Basic Concepts Classification and the Integrative Levels Classification. A phenomenon‐based classification lists classes of phenomena, including things and processes irrespective of the discipline studying them (which can optionally be specified as an additional facet). Facets can work in a phenomenon‐based system much as in a disciplinary one. This kind of system will promote the identification of potential relationships between research in different disciplines, and will especially benefit interdisciplinary work. The paper reviews the theory, history, structure, advantages, applications, and evaluation of phenomenon‐based classification systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Gnoli & Richard P. Smiraglia & Rick Szostak, 2024. "Phenomenon‐based classification: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 324-343, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:3:p:324-343
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24865
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains: How many databases are needed?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(14), pages 1242-1254.
    2. T. Elizabeth Workman & Marcelo Fiszman & Thomas C. Rindflesch & Diane Nahl, 2014. "Framing serendipitous information-seeking behavior for facilitating literature-based discovery: A proposed model," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(3), pages 501-512, March.
    3. Alesia Zuccala, 2006. "Modeling the invisible college," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(2), pages 152-168, January.
    4. Don R. Swanson & Neil R. Smalheiser & A. Bookstein, 2001. "Information discovery from complementary literatures: Categorizing viruses as potential weapons," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(10), pages 797-812.
    5. Rick Szostak, 2011. "Complex concepts into basic concepts," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(11), pages 2247-2265, November.
    6. Saket S. R. Mengle & Nazli Goharian, 2010. "Detecting relationships among categories using text classification," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 1046-1061, May.
    7. Saket S. R. Mengle & Nazli Goharian, 2010. "Detecting relationships among categories using text classification," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 1046-1061, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    2. M. Ausloos, 2013. "A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 895-909, June.
    3. Ausloos, Marcel, 2015. "Coherent measures of the impact of co-authors in peer review journals and in proceedings publications," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 568-578.
    4. Alesia Zuccala & Peter Besselaar, 2009. "Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 111-122, October.
    5. Hassan Bougrine, 2014. "Subfield effects on the core of coauthors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1047-1064, February.
    6. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2003. "Informetric studies using databases: Opportunities and challenges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(3), pages 587-608, November.
    7. Manuel Goyanes & Luis de-Marcos, 2020. "Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: a social network analysis of leading journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 791-811, May.
    8. Alberto Gherardini & Alberto Nucciotti, 2017. "Yesterday’s giants and invisible colleges of today. A study on the ‘knowledge transfer’ scientific domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 255-271, July.
    9. Alberto Baccini & Eugenio Petrovich, 2022. "Normative versus strategic accounts of acknowledgment data: The case of the top-five journals of economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 603-635, January.
    10. Guadalupe Palacios-Núñez & Gabriel Vélez-Cuartas & Juan D. Botero, 2018. "Developmental tendencies in the academic field of intellectual property through the identification of invisible colleges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1561-1574, June.
    11. , Aisdl, 2019. "Resources of The Serendipity Society," OSF Preprints sb9kp, Center for Open Science.
    12. Luis de-Marcos & Manuel Goyanes & Adrián Domínguez-Díaz, 2024. "Mapping science through editorial board interlocking: connections and distance between fields of knowledge and institutional affiliations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 3385-3406, June.
    13. Rongying Zhao & Mingkun Wei, 2017. "Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1777-1791, September.
    14. Maria-Angeles Iniesta-Bonillo & Alinne Pompeu-Queiros & Maria Mercedes Capobianco Uriarte & Helena Alves, 2025. "Mindfulness and consumer behavior: a bibliometric analysis of themes and trends over 20 years," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Sawyer, Steve, 2019. "Networks of innovation: the sociotechnical assemblage of tabletop computing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(S).
    16. João J. M. Ferreira & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Cristina I. M. A. S. Fernandes & Marjan S. Jalali & Mário L. Raposo & Carla S. Marques, 2016. "What do we [not] know about technology entrepreneurship research?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 713-733, September.
    17. Hisato Tashiro & Antonio Lau & Junichiro Mori & Nobuzumi Fujii & Yuya Kajikawa, 2012. "E-mail networks and leadership performance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 600-606, March.
    18. Yi Bu & Tian-yi Liu & Win-bin Huang, 2016. "MACA: a modified author co-citation analysis method combined with general descriptive metadata of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 143-166, July.
    19. Lala Hajibayova & L. P. Coladangelo & Heather A. Soyka, 2021. "Exploring the invisible college of citizen science: questions, methods and contributions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6989-7003, August.
    20. Haiko Lietz, 2020. "Drawing impossible boundaries: field delineation of Social Network Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2841-2876, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:3:p:324-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.