IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v73y2022i9p1268-1278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context, relevance, and labor

Author

Listed:
  • Wayne de Fremery
  • Michael K. Buckland

Abstract

Since information science concerns the transmission of records, it concerns context. The transmission of documents ensures their arrival in new contexts. Documents and their copies are spread across times and places. The amount of labor required to discover and retrieve relevant documents is also formulated by context. Thus, any serious consideration of communication and of information technologies quickly leads to a concern with context, relevance, and labor. Information scientists have developed many theories of context, relevance, and labor but not a framework for organizing them and describing their relationship with one another. We propose the words context and relevance can be used to articulate a useful framework for considering the diversity of approaches to context and relevance in information science, as well as their relations with each other and with labor.

Suggested Citation

  • Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Context, relevance, and labor," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1268-1278, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:9:p:1268-1278
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24631
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tefko Saracevic, 2007. "Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2126-2144, November.
    2. Tefko Saracevic, 2007. "Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 1915-1933, November.
    3. Stephen P. Harter, 1992. "Psychological relevance and information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(9), pages 602-615, October.
    4. William S. Cooper, 1973. "On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(2), pages 87-100, March.
    5. Stefano Mizzaro, 1997. "Relevance: The whole history," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 48(9), pages 810-832, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Lei & Kopak, Rick & Freund, Luanne & Rasmussen, Edie, 2011. "Making functional units functional: The role of rhetorical structure in use of scholarly journal articles," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 21-29.
    2. Howard D. White, 2015. "Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: examples from the humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2275-2299, March.
    3. Ian Ruthven, 2021. "Resonance and the experience of relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(5), pages 554-569, May.
    4. Roland Grad & Pierre Pluye & Vera Granikov & Janique Johnson‐Lafleur & Michael Shulha & Soumya Bindiganavile Sridhar & Jonathan L. Moscovici & Gillian Bartlett & Alain C. Vandal & Bernard Marlow & Lor, 2011. "Physicians' assessment of the value of clinical information: Operationalization of a theoretical model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1884-1891, October.
    5. Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.
    6. Julianne Sansa-Otim & Mary Nsabagwa & Andrew Mwesigwa & Becky Faith & Mojisola Owoseni & Olayinka Osuolale & Daudi Mboma & Ben Khemis & Peter Albino & Samuel Owusu Ansah & Maureen Abla Ahiataku & Vict, 2022. "An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Weather Information Dissemination among Farmers and Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Maram Hasanain & Tamer Elsayed, 2022. "Studying effectiveness of Web search for fact checking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 738-751, May.
    8. Gineke Wiggers & Suzan Verberne & Wouter van Loon & Gerrit‐Jan Zwenne, 2023. "Bibliometric‐enhanced legal information retrieval: Combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 1010-1025, August.
    9. Frans van der Sluis & Egon L. van den Broek, 2023. "Feedback beyond accuracy: Using eye‐tracking to detect comprehensibility and interest during reading," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 3-16, January.
    10. Jensen, Scott & Liu, Xiaozhong & Yu, Yingying & Milojevic, Staša, 2016. "Generation of topic evolution trees from heterogeneous bibliographic networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 606-621.
    11. Antonio Maria Rinaldi & Cristiano Russo & Cristian Tommasino, 2020. "A Knowledge-Driven Multimedia Retrieval System Based on Semantics and Deep Features," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Howard D. White, 2010. "Some new tests of relevance theory in information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 653-667, June.
    13. Yonit Rusho & Daphne R. Raban, 2020. "Hands on: Information Experiences as Sources of Value," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 671-684, June.
    14. Lauri Rapeli & Sakari Nieminen & Marko Mäkelä, 2021. "Not just the facts: an index for measuring the information density of political communication," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1683-1702, October.
    15. Azzah Al‐Maskari & Mark Sanderson, 2010. "A review of factors influencing user satisfaction in information retrieval," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 859-868, May.
    16. Min Sook Park & JungHo Park & Hyejin Kim & Jin Hui Lee & Hyejin Park, 2023. "Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID‐19 vaccination intent," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 846-865, July.
    17. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    18. Marcia J. Bates, 2011. "Birger Hjørland's Manichean misconstruction of Marcia Bates' work," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 2038-2044, October.
    19. Pin Li & Guoli Yang & Chuanqi Wang, 2019. "Visual topical analysis of library and information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1753-1791, December.
    20. Alexandra Dumitrescu & Simone Santini, 2021. "Full coverage of a reader's interests in context‐based information filtering," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 1011-1027, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:9:p:1268-1278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.