IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i3p1272-1284.html

Beyond the European Army Illusion: A Prudent Strategy for the Real European Zeitenwende

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Daßler
  • Moritz Weiss

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Daßler & Moritz Weiss, 2026. "Beyond the European Army Illusion: A Prudent Strategy for the Real European Zeitenwende," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1272-1284, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:1272-1284
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.70029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.70029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Randall Henning & Tyler Pratt, 2023. "Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 2178-2205, November.
    2. Andreas Kruck & Moritz Weiss, 2025. "Disentangling Leviathan on its home turf: Authority foundations, policy instruments, and the making of security," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 146-160, January.
    3. Stéphanie C. Hofmann, 2011. "Why Institutional Overlap Matters: CSDP in the European Security Architecture," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 101-120, January.
    4. Thomas Gehring & Benjamin Faude, 2014. "A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 471-498, December.
    5. Katharina Meissner, 2023. "How to sanction international wrongdoing? The design of EU restrictive measures," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 61-85, January.
    6. Dennis Broeders & Fabio Cristiano & Monica Kaminska, 2023. "In Search of Digital Sovereignty and Strategic Autonomy: Normative Power Europe to the Test of Its Geopolitical Ambitions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1261-1280, September.
    7. Ana E. Juncos & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2024. "The Ideational Power of Strategic Autonomy in EU Security and External Economic Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 955-972, July.
    8. Daniel Fiott, 2024. "From Liberalisation to Industrial Policy: Towards a Geoeconomic Turn in the European Defence Market?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1012-1027, July.
    9. Diana Panke & Sören Stapel, 2023. "Navigating Regional Regime Complexity: How and Why Does the European Union Cooperate With Regional Organizations?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 97-108.
    10. Peter Seeberg, 2016. "The EU and the international sanctions against Iran: European and Iranian foreign and security policy interests and a changing Middle East," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    12. Diana Panke & Sören Stapel, 2023. "Navigating Regional Regime Complexity: How and Why Does the European Union Cooperate With Regional Organizations?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 97-108.
    13. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    2. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    3. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    4. Emil Kirchner, 2024. "Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 333-349, September.
    5. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Thomas Conzelmann & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2026. "The European Union in a Geo‐Economic World: Towards a New Inter‐Institutional Balance?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 511-532, March.
    7. Hansen, Olle, 2026. "EU integration after the Liberal International Order," IPE Working Papers 265/2026, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    8. Jan Ruck, 2026. "A Geoeconomic Fix? European Industrial Policy on Semiconductors Amidst Global Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 742-761, March.
    9. Sarah Bauerle Danzman & Sophie Meunier, 2024. "The EU's Geoeconomic Turn: From Policy Laggard to Institutional Innovator," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1097-1115, July.
    10. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    11. Diana Panke & Sören Stapel, 2024. "Cooperation between international organizations: Demand, supply, and restraint," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 269-305, April.
    12. Stephen, Matthew D., 2021. "China's New Multilateral Institutions: A Framework and Research Agenda," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 807-834.
    13. Gutner, Tamar & Heltberg, Rasmus, 2025. "Conceptualizing and evaluating how international organizations collaborate," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Faude, Benjamin, 2020. "International institutions in hard times: how institutional complexity increases resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108663, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Bernhard Reinsberg & Oliver Westerwinter, 2023. "Institutional Overlap in Global Governance and the Design of Intergovernmental Organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 693-724, October.
    16. Tom Delreux & Joseph Earsom, 2023. "The European Union as an Actor Navigating International Regime Complexes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5.
    17. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni & Oliver Westerwinter, 2022. "The global governance complexity cube: Varieties of institutional complexity in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 233-262, April.
    18. Jonathan Ariel & Yoram Z. Haftel, 2021. "Mostly in its Backyard: Security Provisions in EU Economic Agreements," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1419-1437, November.
    19. Sergio Mariotti, 2025. "“Open strategic autonomy” as an industrial policy compass for the EU competitiveness and growth: The good, the bad, or the ugly?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(1), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Daniel Fiott, 2024. "From Liberalisation to Industrial Policy: Towards a Geoeconomic Turn in the European Defence Market?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1012-1027, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:1272-1284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.