IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v60y2022i3p634-652.html

Why Do some Labour Alliances Succeed in Politicizing Europe across Borders? A Comparison of the Right2Water and Fair Transport European Citizens' Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Imre G. Szabó
  • Darragh Golden
  • Roland Erne

Abstract

Under what conditions can organized labour successfully politicize the European integration process across borders? To answer this question, we compare the European Citizens' Initiatives (ECIs) of two European trade union federations: EPSU's successful Right2Water ECI and ETF's unsuccessful Fair Transport ECI. Our comparison reveals that actor‐centred factors matter – namely, unions' ability to create broad coalitions. Successful transnational labour campaigns, however, also depend on structural conditions, namely, the prevailing mode of EU integration pressures faced by unions at a given time. Whereas the Right2Water ECI pre‐emptively countered commodification attempts by the European Commission in water services, the Fair Transport ECI attempted to ensure fair working conditions after most of the transport sector had been liberalized. Vertical EU integration attempts that commodify public services are thus more likely to generate successful transnational counter‐movements than the horizontal integration pressures on wages and working conditions that followed earlier successful EU liberalization drives.

Suggested Citation

  • Imre G. Szabó & Darragh Golden & Roland Erne, 2022. "Why Do some Labour Alliances Succeed in Politicizing Europe across Borders? A Comparison of the Right2Water and Fair Transport European Citizens' Initiatives," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 634-652, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:634-652
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13279
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hall, David & Lobina, Emanuele, 2007. "International actors and multinational water company strategies in Europe, 1990-2003," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 64-77, June.
    2. Hutter, Swen & Kriesi, Hanspeter, 2019. "Politicizing Europe in times of crisis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(7), pages 996-1017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rauh, Christian & Parizek, Michal, 2024. "Converging on Europe? The European Union in mediatised debates during the COVID-19 and Ukraine shocks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(10), pages 3036-3065.
    2. Maria Wincławska & Anna Pacześniak, 2026. "Deconstructing Polish Euro‐Enthusiasm: The Illusory Incongruence of Party Narratives With Public Opinion," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    3. Nuno Teles, 2015. "Financialisation and neoliberalism; The case of water provision in Portugal," Working papers wpaper102, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    4. Petrova, Bilyana & Ranaldi, Marco, 2021. "Determinants of Income Composition Inequality," SocArXiv vyrz7, Center for Open Science.
    5. Fanghella, Valeria & Schleich, Joachim & Sebi, Carine, 2026. "Populism and support of onshore wind energy: Explaining different perspectives from the left and right," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Andres Reiljan & Lorenzo Cicchi & Diego Garzia, 2023. "Party placement in the void: the European political space in 10 years of cross-national Voting Advice Applications," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/20, European University Institute.
    7. Luca Carrieri, 2024. "Awakening the Europhile Giant: EU Issue Voting in Western and Central‐Eastern Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 262-284, January.
    8. Thomas M. Meyer & Katjana Gattermann, 2022. "Party contestation and news visibility abroad: The 2019 European Parliament election from a pan-European perspective," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 398-416, September.
    9. Claude Ménard & Aleksandra Peeroo, 2011. "Liberalization in the Water Sector: Three Leading Models," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Bayerlein, Michael & Diermeier, Matthias, 2022. "Exchanging money for love? A regional analysis of EU cohesion policy on euroscepticism," Kiel Working Papers 2219, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    11. Carlos Jalali & Patrícia Silva & Patrício Costa & Filipe Falcão, 2025. "Which cues matter: The effect of content cues on European Union support," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(4), pages 736-758, December.
    12. repec:osf:socarx:vyrz7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mikail Pehlivan & Nazan Susam, 2022. "Transformation of Water Services: Lessons Learned from Water Privatization in Multiple Countries," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 65(65), pages 129-160, June.
    14. Bayerlein, Michael & Diermeier, Matthias, 2025. "Exchanging money for love? A regional analysis of EU cohesion policy and Euroscepticism," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1118-1132.
    15. Wouter van der Brug & Katjana Gattermann & Claes H. de Vreese, 2022. "Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European Elections of 2019 and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.
    16. repec:osf:socarx:d8vbq_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Stefan Telle & Lisanne de Blok & Catherine E. de Vries & Lorenzo Cicchi, 2022. "Elite‐Mass Linkages in the Preference Formation on Differentiated Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1663-1683, November.
    18. Sandra Destradi & Emidio Diodato, 2026. "The Long‐Term Effects of Populism on Foreign Policy: Berlusconi's Legacy and Its Impact on Italy's Approach to the EU and International Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 720-741, March.
    19. Alex Andrione‐Moylan & Pieter de Wilde & Kolja Raube, 2024. "(De‐)politicization Discourse Strategies: The Case of Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 21-37, January.
    20. Joost Berkhout & Marcel Hanegraaff & Patrick Statsch, 2020. "Interest Groups in Multi-Level Contexts: European Integration as Cross-Cutting Issue in Party-Interest Group Contacts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 61-71.
    21. Márton Bene & Melanie Magin & Daniel Jackson & Darren Lilleker & Delia Balaban & Paweł Baranowski & Jörg Haßler & Simon Kruschinski & Uta Russmann, 2022. "The Polyphonic Sounds of Europe: Users’ Engagement With Parties’ European-Focused Facebook Posts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 108-120.
    22. Nuria Font, 2025. "Issue Salience in the European Parliament Election: An Analysis of Economic, Environmental and Immigration Issues on Social Media," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(6), pages 1931-1948, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:634-652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.