IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v43y2005i1p193-220.html

Claims to Legitimacy: The European Commission between Continuity and Change

Author

Listed:
  • MYRTO TSAKATIKA

Abstract

This article attempts to spell out the Commission's present position on the following set of questions: according to which normative criteria can European integration, European governance and the Commission's own roles in the two processes be considered legitimate? Taking the 2001 White Paper on Governance as a reference point, it is argued that the Commission is trapped between two sets of claims to legitimacy: one set of claims coming from the Monnet tradition of thought, where the stress is on unity, efficiency, responsibility and impartiality; and a second set of claims coming from the post‐Maastricht critique of the Union, which highlight diversity, clarity and democracy. The result has been that the European Commission entered the recent constitutional debate with a set of proposals that did not do much to strengthen its own position in the Union, or to contribute innovative ideas to the debate, which was meant to deal with the great challenges that lie ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Myrto Tsakatika, 2005. "Claims to Legitimacy: The European Commission between Continuity and Change," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 193-220, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:43:y:2005:i:1:p:193-220
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00552.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00552.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00552.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fritz Scharpf, 2002. "Legitimate Diversity: the New Challenge of European Integration," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 1, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    2. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2001. "European governance: Common concerns vs. the challenge of diversity," MPIfG Working Paper 01/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Hussein Kassim & Anand Menon, 2004. "European Integration Since the 1990s: Member States and the European Commission," ARENA Working Papers 6, ARENA.
    4. Christopher Lord & Paul Magnette, 2002. "Notes Towards a General Theory of Legitimacy in the European Union," One Europe or Several? Working Papers 39, One-Europe Programme.
    5. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2003. "Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU," MPIfG Working Paper 03/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Andreas Føllesdal, 2004. "Legitimacy Theories of the European Union," ARENA Working Papers 15, ARENA.
    7. Paul Magnette, 2001. "European Governance and Civic Participation: Can the European Union be politicised?," Jean Monnet Working Papers 9, Jean Monnet Chair.
    8. Tanja A.Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2000. "Who is Afraid of a European Federation? How to Constitutionalise a Multi-Level Governance System," Jean Monnet Working Papers 1, Jean Monnet Chair.
    9. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1998. "Interdependence and democratic legitimation," MPIfG Working Paper 98/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Marlene Wind, 2001. "The Commission White Paper Bridging the Gap between the Governed and the Governing?," Jean Monnet Working Papers 24, Jean Monnet Chair.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Finke, Barbara, . "Civil society participation in EU governance," Living Reviews in European Governance (LREG), Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    2. Thomas Laloux & Lara Panning, 2021. "Why Defend Something I Don’t Agree with? Conflicts within the Commission and Legislative Amendments in Trilogues," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 40-51.
    3. Rodekamp, Meike, 2010. "Representatives or experts? Civil society organizations in the EU's external relations," TranState Working Papers 137, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    4. Rauh, Christian, 2022. "Clear messages to the European public? The language of European Commission press releases 1985–2020," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-19.
    5. Pamela Pansardi & Pier Domenico Tortola, 2022. "A “More Political” Commission? Reassessing EC Politicization through Language," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1047-1068, July.
    6. Thomas Laloux & Lara Panning, 2021. "Why Defend Something I Don’t Agree with? Conflicts within the Commission and Legislative Amendments in Trilogues," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 40-51.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    2. Michael Longo, 2003. "European Integration: Between Micro‐Regionalism and Globalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 475-494, June.
    3. Janine Goetschy, 2003. "The European Employment Strategy and the open method of coordination: lessons and perspectives," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 281-301, May.
    4. Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, 2002. "Types of Multi-Level Governance," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    5. Abels, Gabriele, 2002. "Experts, Citizens, and Eurocrats Towards a Policy Shift in the Governance of Biopolitics in the EU," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 6, December.
    6. B. Ayça Ataç-Studt, 2025. "Balancing effectiveness and legitimacy: resettlement of property owners in flooded areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(16), pages 19163-19187, September.
    7. Citi, Manuele & Rhodes, Martin, 2007. "New Modes of Governance in the EU: Common Objectives versus National Preferences," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 1, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    8. Klaudijo Klaser, 2020. "A Theory of Justice of John Rawls as Basis for European Fiscal Union," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 11(1-2).
    9. Mende, Janne, 2020. "Business authority in global governance: Beyond public and private," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2020-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Liana Giorgi & Michael Schmidt, 2004. "Transalpine transport: a local problem in search of European solutions or a European problem in search of local solutions?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 201-219, April.
    11. Chisung Park & Jooha Lee & Changho Chung, 2015. "Is “legitimized” policy always successful? Policy legitimacy and cultural policy in Korea," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 319-338, September.
    12. Anne Bach Nielsen & Marielle Papin, 2021. "The hybrid governance of environmental transnational municipal networks: Lessons from 100 Resilient Cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 667-685, June.
    13. Afrah Al-Ahmadi & Giuseppe Zampaglione, 2022. "From Protracted Humanitarian Relief to State-led Social Safety Net System," World Bank Publications - Reports 36864, The World Bank Group.
    14. Blom, Tannelie & Radulova, Elissaveta & Arnold, Christine, 2008. "Theorizing Modes of Governance in the EU: Institutional Design and Informational Complexity," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 4, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    15. Liesbet Hooghe, 2012. "The European Commission in the 21st Century - Core Beliefs on EU Governance," KFG Working Papers p0038, Free University Berlin.
    16. Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, 2017. "Why Implement without a Tangible Threat? The Effect of a Soft Instrument on National Migrant Integration Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1127-1143, September.
    17. Alina BÂRGĂOANU, Elena NEGREA-BUSUIOC, 2014. "What Kind Of Union? The Future Of The European Union As Seen By Candidates To The Ec Presidency In The 2014 Ep Elections," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 8(2), pages 19-35.
    18. Mende, Janne, 2022. "Business authority in global governance: Beyond public and private," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2020-103r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, revised 2022.
    19. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i::p:27-49 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Steffek, Jens, 2014. "The democratic output legitimacy of international organizations," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2014-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    21. Bastiaan Redert, 2020. "Stakeholder Mobilization in Financial Regulation: A Comparison of EU Regulatory Politics over Time," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1433-1451, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:43:y:2005:i:1:p:193-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.