IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v83y2015i2p293-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Some Principles of Statistical Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Reid
  • David R. Cox

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="insr12067-abs-0001"> Statistical theory aims to provide a foundation for studying the collection and interpretation of data, a foundation that does not depend on the particular details of the substantive field in which the data are being considered. This gives a systematic way to approach new problems, and a common language for summarising results; ideally, the foundations and common language ensure that statistical aspects of one study, or of several studies on closely related phenomena, can be broadly accessible. We discuss some principles of statistical inference, to outline how these are, or could be, used to inform the interpretation of results, and to provide a greater degree of coherence for the foundations of statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Reid & David R. Cox, 2015. "On Some Principles of Statistical Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 293-308, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:83:y:2015:i:2:p:293-308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/insr.12067
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/555 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. D. R. Cox & Man Yu Wong, 2004. "A simple procedure for the selection of significant effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 395-400, May.
    3. Min-ge Xie & Kesar Singh, 2013. "Confidence Distribution, the Frequentist Distribution Estimator of a Parameter: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(1), pages 3-39, April.
    4. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498, August.
    5. Tore Schweder & Nils Lid Hjort, 2002. "Confidence and Likelihood," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(2), pages 309-332, June.
    6. Jan Hannig & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2009. "Generalized fiducial inference for wavelet regression," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(4), pages 847-860.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubin, Mark, 2020. "Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?," MetaArXiv vgr89, Center for Open Science.
    2. David J. Hand, 2022. "Trustworthiness of statistical inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 329-347, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David R. Bickel, 2014. "Small-scale Inference: Empirical Bayes and Confidence Methods for as Few as a Single Comparison," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(3), pages 457-476, December.
    2. Piero Veronese & Eugenio Melilli, 2021. "Confidence Distribution for the Ability Parameter of the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 131-166, March.
    3. Yang Liu & Jan Hannig, 2017. "Generalized Fiducial Inference for Logistic Graded Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1097-1125, December.
    4. Piero Veronese & Eugenio Melilli, 2015. "Fiducial and Confidence Distributions for Real Exponential Families," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 471-484, June.
    5. La Vecchia, Davide & Moor, Alban & Scaillet, Olivier, 2023. "A higher-order correct fast moving-average bootstrap for dependent data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 65-81.
    6. Xiaokang Luo & Tirthankar Dasgupta & Minge Xie & Regina Y. Liu, 2021. "Leveraging the Fisher randomization test using confidence distributions: Inference, combination and fusion learning," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(4), pages 777-797, September.
    7. Veronese, Piero & Melilli, Eugenio, 2018. "Some asymptotic results for fiducial and confidence distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-105.
    8. Xuhua Liu & Xingzhong Xu, 2016. "Confidence distribution inferences in one-way random effects model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 59-74, March.
    9. Seungyong Hwang & Randy C. S. Lai & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2022. "Generalized Fiducial Inference for Threshold Estimation in Dose–Response and Regression Settings," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(1), pages 109-124, March.
    10. Andrea C. Garcia‐Angulo & Gerda Claeskens, 2023. "Exact uniformly most powerful postselection confidence distributions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 50(1), pages 358-382, March.
    11. Ionut Bebu & George Luta & Thomas Mathew & Brian K. Agan, 2016. "Generalized Confidence Intervals and Fiducial Intervals for Some Epidemiological Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Wu, Suofei & Hannig, Jan & Lee, Thomas C.M., 2022. "Uncertainty quantification for honest regression trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Liu, Xuhua & Li, Na & Hu, Yuqin, 2015. "Combining inferences on the common mean of several inverse Gaussian distributions based on confidence distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 136-142.
    14. Michael P. Fay & Michael A. Proschan & Erica Brittain, 2015. "Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 146-156, March.
    15. Delbianco Fernando & Tohmé Fernando, 2023. "What is a relevant control?: An algorithmic proposal," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4643, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    16. Youngchao Ge & Sandrine Dudoit & Terence Speed, 2003. "Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 1-77, June.
    17. Bajgrowicz, Pierre & Scaillet, Olivier, 2012. "Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 473-491.
    18. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    19. Dørum Guro & Snipen Lars & Solheim Margrete & Saebo Solve, 2011. "Smoothing Gene Expression Data with Network Information Improves Consistency of Regulated Genes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Jianqing Fan & Xu Han, 2017. "Estimation of the false discovery proportion with unknown dependence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1143-1164, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:83:y:2015:i:2:p:293-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.