IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i3p748-762.html

Solid waste optimization life‐cycle framework in Python (SwolfPy)

Author

Listed:
  • Mojtaba Sardarmehni
  • Pedro H. Chagas Anchieta
  • James W. Levis

Abstract

This paper describes a novel open‐source life‐cycle optimization framework for solid waste and sustainable materials management applications named solid waste optimization life‐cycle framework in Python (SwolfPy). The current version includes life‐cycle models for landfills, mass burn waste‐to‐energy, gasification, centralized composting, home composting, anaerobic digestion, material recovery facilities, refuse‐derived fuel facilities, material recycling, transfer stations, and single‐family collection. Compared to existing frameworks, SwolfPy streamlines data input/output processes, improves model integration and modularity, provides a wide variety of data visualization and customization, speeds up uncertainty analysis and optimization, and has a user‐friendly graphical user interface (GUI). SwolfPy's GUI allows users to define solid waste management networks and scenarios as well as perform comparative life cycle assessments (LCAs), contribution analyses, uncertainty analyses, and optimization. SwolfPy is implemented in Python using Pandas, NumPy, and SciPy for computational tasks, PySide2 for creating the GUI, and Brightway2 for storing life‐cycle inventory data and performing the LCA calculations. SwolfPy is modular and flexible, which enables it to be easily coupled with other packages and to facilitate the addition of new processes, materials, environmental flows and impacts, and methodologies. SwolfPy uses sequential least‐squares programming for constrained nonlinear optimization to find systems and strategies that minimize cost or environmental emissions and impacts while meeting user‐defined constraints. An illustrative case study with 44 materials, 4 collection processes, and 6 treatment processes is presented, and SwolfPy performs 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations in 16 min and finds optimal solutions in 10–25 min on a Windows 10 machine with a CPU speed of 3.60 GHz and 8 logical processors. This article met the requirements for a Gold‐Gold Badge. JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

Suggested Citation

  • Mojtaba Sardarmehni & Pedro H. Chagas Anchieta & James W. Levis, 2022. "Solid waste optimization life‐cycle framework in Python (SwolfPy)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 748-762, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:748-762
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13236
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Kühnen & Rüdiger Hahn, 2017. "Indicators in Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Frameworks, Theories, and Empirical Experience," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(6), pages 1547-1565, December.
    2. Stefan Pauliuk & Guillaume Majeau-Bettez & Christopher L. Mutel & Bernhard Steubing & Konstantin Stadler, 2015. "Lifting Industrial Ecology Modeling to a New Level of Quality and Transparency: A Call for More Transparent Publications and a Collaborative Open Source Software Framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(6), pages 937-949, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Wiedmann, 2017. "An input–output virtual laboratory in practice – survey of uptake, usage and applications of the first operational IELab," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 296-312, April.
    2. Mitchell K. van der Hulst & Mark A. J. Huijbregts & Niels van Loon & Mirjam Theelen & Lucinda Kootstra & Joseph D. Bergesen & Mara Hauck, 2020. "A systematic approach to assess the environmental impact of emerging technologies: A case study for the GHG footprint of CIGS solar photovoltaic laminate," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1234-1249, December.
    3. Carina Harpprecht & Lauran van Oers & Stephen A. Northey & Yongxiang Yang & Bernhard Steubing, 2021. "Environmental impacts of key metals' supply and low‐carbon technologies are likely to decrease in the future," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1543-1559, December.
    4. Nilufer C. Okay & Asli Sencer & Nazim Taskin, 2026. "Quantitative indicators for environmental and social sustainability performance assessment of the supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 6049-6069, March.
    5. Golinucci, Nicolò & Tonini, Francesco & Rocco, Matteo Vincenzo & Colombo, Emanuela, 2023. "Towards BitCO2, an individual consumption-based carbon emission reduction mechanism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Roope Husgafvel, 2021. "Exploring Social Sustainability Handprint—Part 1: Handprint and Life Cycle Thinking and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-36, October.
    7. Hannah Karlewski & Annekatrin Lehmann & Klaus Ruhland & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2019. "A Practical Approach for Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Automotive Industry," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-60, August.
    8. Simone Wurster, 2021. "Creating a Circular Economy in the Automotive Industry: The Contribution of Combining Crowdsourcing and Delphi Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Ricardo J. Bonilla-Alicea & Katherine Fu, 2019. "Systematic Map of the Social Impact Assessment Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-30, July.
    10. De Rosa, Michele, 2018. "Land Use and Land-use Changes in Life Cycle Assessment: Green Modelling or Black Boxing?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-81.
    11. Stefan Gold & Thomas Chesney & Tim Gruchmann & Alexander Trautrims, 2020. "Diffusion of labor standards through supplier–subcontractor networks: An agent‐based model," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1274-1286, December.
    12. Sun, Ya-Yen & Cadarso, Maria Angeles & Driml, Sally, 2020. "Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Matthias Schlipf & Bastian Striegl & Tobias Gaugler, 2024. "Climate true‐cost analysis of industrial goods and its regulatory implications on value chains and global competition," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 589-602, June.
    14. Vincenzo Basile & Nunzia Petacca & Roberto Vona, 2024. "Measuring Circularity in Life Cycle Management: A Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 419-443, September.
    15. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    16. Leticia Inácio & Ivete Delai, 2022. "Sustainable banking: a systematic review of concepts and measurements," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-39, January.
    17. Tobias Junne & Sonja Simon & Jens Buchgeister & Maximilian Saiger & Manuel Baumann & Martina Haase & Christina Wulf & Tobias Naegler, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Max Rehberger & Michael Hiete, 2020. "Allocation of Environmental Impacts in Circular and Cascade Use of Resources—Incentive-Driven Allocation as a Prerequisite for Cascade Persistence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Simon Glöser‐Chahoud & Matthias Pfaff & Frank Schultmann, 2021. "The link between product service lifetime and GHG emissions: A comparative study for different consumer products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 465-478, April.
    20. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:748-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.