IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v47y2023i3p425-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AGAINST THE COLONIZATION OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT: The Top‐dong Right to the City Movement in Jeju, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Youjeong Oh

Abstract

The Top‐dong Movement was an extensive residents’ resistance mobilization against the Top‐dong Public Water Reclamation project in the late 1980s in Jeju, South Korea. Starting as a local female divers’ struggle for subsistence, the Top‐dong Movement grew into a collective action to reveal the illegalities of the project, demand that profits should be fairly shared and assert self‐determination. State‐led development of Jeju in the post‐Korean war period functioned to render the island an extractive periphery during South Korea's capitalist modernization. Within that context, the Top‐dong reclamation project exemplifies how urban development projects create colonial conditions in local communities by dispossessing them of land and the means of subsistence, commodifying public resources and extracting profits. Jeju islanders reacted by claiming specific rights: female divers’ collective rights to public water and the means of livelihood against dispossession; local residents’ rights to control developmental profits against extraction; and islanders’ rights to participate in decision‐making processes against exclusion. Bridging Lefebvre's two concepts—colonization and the right to the city, this article argues that the historically situated, place‐based right to the city movement revealed the colonization involved in urban development and performed practices of decolonization.

Suggested Citation

  • Youjeong Oh, 2023. "AGAINST THE COLONIZATION OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT: The Top‐dong Right to the City Movement in Jeju, South Korea," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 425-443, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:47:y:2023:i:3:p:425-443
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Marcuse, 2009. "From critical urban theory to the right to the city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 185-197, June.
    2. Dong-Wan Gimm, 2013. "Fracturing Hegemony: Regionalism and State Rescaling in South Korea, 1961–71," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1147-1167, July.
    3. Johannes Novy & Claire Colomb, 2013. "Struggling for the Right to the (Creative) City in Berlin and Hamburg: New Urban Social Movements, New ‘Spaces of Hope’?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1816-1838, September.
    4. Talja Blokland & Christine Hentschel & Andrej Holm & Henrik Lebuhn & Talia Margalit, 2015. "Urban Citizenship and Right to the City: The Fragmentation of Claims," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 655-665, July.
    5. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    6. Phil Hubbard & Loretta Lees, 2018. "The right to community?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 8-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sören Becker & James Angel & Matthias Naumann, 2020. "Energy democracy as the right to the city: Urban energy struggles in Berlin and London," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1093-1111, September.
    2. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    3. Sergio Belda-Miquel & Jordi Peris Blanes & Alexandre Frediani, 2016. "Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 321-339, March.
    4. Cardullo, Paolo, 2018. "Commoning the smart city: A case for a public Internet provision," SocArXiv u8dk2, Center for Open Science.
    5. Mine Eder & Özlem Öz, 2015. "Neoliberalization of Istanbul's Nightlife: Beer or Champagne?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 284-304, March.
    6. Hyun Bang Shin, 2011. "Right to the city and critical reflections on property rights activism in China’s urban renewal contexts," CASE Papers case156, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Ben Gerlofs, 2020. "Dreaming dialectically: The death and life of the Mexico City charter for the right to the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2064-2079, August.
    8. Gillad Rosen & Anne B. Shlay, 2014. "Whose Right to Jerusalem?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 935-950, May.
    9. Witten, Karen & Kearns, Robin & Carroll, Penelope, 2015. "Urban inclusion as wellbeing: Exploring children's accounts of confronting diversity on inner city streets," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 349-357.
    10. Walter Alando & Joachim Scheiner, 2016. "Framing Social Inclusion as a Benchmark for Cycling-Inclusive Transport Policy in Kisumu, Kenya," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 46-60.
    11. Morgana G Martins Krieger & Marlei Pozzebon & Lauro Gonzalez, 2021. "When social movements collaborate with the state towards the right to the city: Unveiling compromises and conflicts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1115-1139, August.
    12. Osborne, Natalie & Grant-Smith, Deanna, 2017. "Constructing the cycling citizen: A critical analysis of policy imagery in Brisbane, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 44-53.
    13. Nir Cohen & Talia Margalit, 2015. "‘There are Really Two Cities Here’: Fragmented Urban Citizenship In Tel Aviv," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 666-686, July.
    14. repec:cep:sticas:/156 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. O'Neill, Ella & Cole, Helen V.S. & García-Lamarca, Melissa & Anguelovski, Isabelle & Gullón, Pedro & Triguero-Mas, Margarita, 2023. "The right to the unhealthy deprived city: An exploration into the impacts of state-led redevelopment projects on the determinants of mental health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    16. Eric K Chu, 2018. "Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state–society relations: The politics of community knowledge and mobilisation in Indore, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1766-1782, June.
    17. Nathan McClintock & Michael Simpson, 2018. "Stacking functions: identifying motivational frames guiding urban agriculture organizations and businesses in the United States and Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(1), pages 19-39, March.
    18. Shin, Hyun Bang, 2011. "Right to the city and critical reflections on property rights activism in China’s urban renewal contexts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 41898, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Kira Kosnick, 2015. "A Clash Of Subcultures? Questioning Queer–Muslim Antagonisms in the Neoliberal City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 687-703, July.
    20. Miriam Williams, 2017. "Searching for actually existing justice in the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(10), pages 2217-2231, August.
    21. Esin Özdemir & Tuna Tasan-Kok, 2019. "Planners’ role in accommodating citizen disagreement: The case of Dutch urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 741-759, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:47:y:2023:i:3:p:425-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.