IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v37y2022i4p2224-2239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The teamwork structure, process, and context of a paediatric cardiac surgery team in Mongolia: A mixed‐methods approach

Author

Listed:
  • Seungheon Han
  • Sugy Choi
  • Jayoung Park
  • Seoah Kweon
  • Se Jin Oh
  • Holly B. Shakya
  • Jongho Heo
  • Woong‐Han Kim

Abstract

Introduction Effective teamwork in paediatric cardiac surgery is known to improve team performance and surgical outcomes. However, teamwork in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), including Mongolia, is understudied. We examined multiple dimensions of teamwork to inform a team‐based training programme to strengthen paediatric cardiac surgical care in Mongolia. Methods We used a mixed‐methods approach, combining social network analysis and in‐depth interviews with medical staff, to explore the structure, process, quality, and context of teamwork at a single medical centre. We conceptualised the team's structure based on communication frequency among the members (n = 24) and explored the process, quality, and context of teamwork via in‐depth interviews with select medical staff (n = 9). Results The team structure was highly dense and decentralised, but the intensive care unit nurses showed high betweenness‐centrality. In the quality and process domain of teamwork, we did not find a regular joint decision‐making process, leading to the absence of common goals among the team members. Although role assignment among the medical staff was explicit, those strictly defined roles hindered active communication about patient information and responsibility‐sharing. Most interviewees did not agree with the organisational policies that limited discussions among team members; therefore, medical staff continued to share training and work experiences with each other, leading to strong and trustworthy relationships. Conclusion The findings of this study underscore the importance of well‐structured and goal‐oriented communication between medical staff, as well as the management of the quality of collaboration within a team to increase teamwork effectiveness in paediatric cardiac surgery teams in LMICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungheon Han & Sugy Choi & Jayoung Park & Seoah Kweon & Se Jin Oh & Holly B. Shakya & Jongho Heo & Woong‐Han Kim, 2022. "The teamwork structure, process, and context of a paediatric cardiac surgery team in Mongolia: A mixed‐methods approach," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 2224-2239, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:2224-2239
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3463
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meltzer, David & Chung, Jeanette & Khalili, Parham & Marlow, Elizabeth & Arora, Vineet & Schumock, Glen & Burt, Ron, 2010. "Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1119-1130, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gort, Marjan & Broekhuis, Manda & Regts, Gerdien, 2013. "How teams use indicators for quality improvement – A multiple-case study on the use of multiple indicators in multidisciplinary breast cancer teams," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-77.
    2. Martine Audibert & Xiao Xian Huang & Jacky Mathonnat & Aurore Pelissier & Anning Ma, 2012. "Health Insurance Reform and Efficiency of Township Hospitals in Rural China: An Analysis from Survey Data," CERDI Working papers halshs-00587799, HAL.
    3. Audibert, Martine & Mathonnat, Jacky & Pelissier, Aurore & Huang, Xiao Xian & Ma, Anning, 2013. "Health insurance reform and efficiency of township hospitals in rural China: An analysis from survey data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 326-338.
    4. Julie M Donohue & Hasan Guclu & Walid F Gellad & Chung-Chou H Chang & Haiden A Huskamp & Niteesh K Choudhry & Ruoxin Zhang & Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic & Stefanie P Junker & Timothy Anderson & Seth Richards, 2018. "Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. M. A. Miranda & S. Salvatierra & I. Rodríguez & M. J. Álvarez & V. Rodríguez, 2020. "Characterization of the flow of patients in a hospital from complex networks," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 66-79, March.
    6. Huesch, Marco D., 2011. "Is blood thicker than water? Peer effects in stent utilization among Floridian cardiologists," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(12), pages 1756-1765.
    7. Burns, Lawton R. & Nembhard, Ingrid M. & Shortell, Stephen M., 2022. "Integrating network theory into the study of integrated healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    8. Siantz, Elizabeth & Center, Kimberly & Lansing, Amy E. & Sanghvi, Nisha & Gilmer, Todd P., 2023. "‘We’re not a separate entity, we're staff now’ The involvement of transition age youth peer supporters in trauma-informed community partnerships," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Sebastian Linde, 2019. "The formation of physician patient sharing networks in medicare: Exploring the effect of hospital affiliation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(12), pages 1435-1448, December.
    10. Dunn, Adam G. & Westbrook, Johanna I., 2011. "Interpreting social network metrics in healthcare organisations: A review and guide to validating small networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1064-1068, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:2224-2239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.