IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i5p798-810.html

Radical Reform of the International Investment Treaty Regime: A Role for Climate Clubs?

Author

Listed:
  • Kyla Tienhaara
  • Harro van Asselt
  • Peter Newell

Abstract

There is growing concern that provisions in international investment treaties are being used to delay the critically needed transition away from fossil fuels. Although various procedural and substantive reforms have been pursued in recent years, these reforms have thus far failed to tackle the fundamental problems with investment treaties and the investor‐state dispute settlement (ISDS) system associated with them. By way of an alternative approach, this article assesses the potential for “climate clubs” to act as a forum for the development of initiatives that range from providing a waiver agreement for ISDS related to fossil fuel assets, to a general ISDS waiver agreement, to a mutual agreement to terminate investment treaties. These initiatives could be implemented in an existing climate club, or a new club could be formed for this purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyla Tienhaara & Harro van Asselt & Peter Newell, 2025. "Radical Reform of the International Investment Treaty Regime: A Role for Climate Clubs?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 798-810, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:798-810
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70067
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David G. Victor, 2006. "Toward Effective International Cooperation on Climate Change: Numbers, Interests and Institutions," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 6(3), pages 90-103, August.
    2. Jessica F. Green, 2017. "The strength of weakness: pseudo-clubs in the climate regime," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 41-52, September.
    3. Harro van Asselt & Peter Newell, 2022. "Pathways to an International Agreement to Leave Fossil Fuels in the Ground," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 22(4), pages 28-47, Autumn.
    4. Joshua W. Busby & Johannes Urpelainen, 2020. "Following the Leaders? How to Restore Progress in Global Climate Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 99-121, Autumn.
    5. Robert Falkner & Naghmeh Nasiritousi & Gunilla Reischl, 2022. "Climate clubs: politically feasible and desirable?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 480-487, April.
    6. Robyn Eckersley, 2012. "Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 12(2), pages 24-42, May.
    7. Bonnitcha, Jonathan & Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N. & Waibel, Michael, 2017. "The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198719557.
    8. Alessandra Arcuri & Kyla Tienhaara & Lorenzo Pellegrini, 2024. "Investment law v. supply-side climate policies: insights from Rockhopper v. Italy and Lone Pine v. Canada," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 193-216, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Hale, 2020. "Catalytic Cooperation," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 73-98, Autumn.
    2. Jean-Frédéric Morin & Clara Brandi & Jakob Schwab, 2024. "Environmental agreements as clubs: Evidence from a new dataset of trade provisions," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 33-62, January.
    3. Yoonsoo Kim & Inhwan Ko, 2025. "Translocal climate club as a wall of fame? A panel study on the US cities’ membership in the Global Covenant of Mayors, 2014–2024," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 563-580, September.
    4. Joseph Earsom, 2024. "Fit for purpose? Just Energy Transition Partnerships and accountability in international climate governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 135-141, February.
    5. Sam S. Rowan, 2025. "Effective climate clubs require ambition, leverage and insulation: Theorizing issue linkage in climate change and trade," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 605-630, September.
    6. Robert Falkner, 2015. "A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits and international legitimacy," GRI Working Papers 197, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    7. Panagiotis Fragkos & Francesco Dalla Longa & Eleftheria Zisarou & Bob van der Zwaan & Anastasis Giannousakis & Amir Fattahi, 2023. "Exploring Model-Based Decarbonization and Energy Efficiency Scenarios with PROMETHEUS and TIAM-ECN," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Joseph E. Aldy & Robert N. Stavins, 2025. "Rolling the Dice in the Corridors of Power: William Nordhaus’s Impacts on Climate Change Policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Economics of Environment, Climate Change, and Wine Selected Papers of Robert N Stavins Volume 3 (2011–2023), chapter 3, pages 31-52, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. David G. Victor, 2016. "What the Framework Convention on Climate Change Teaches Us About Cooperation on Climate Change," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 133-141.
    10. Polanco, Rodrigo, 2022. "Sustainable Development in Chilean International Investment Agreements," Papers 1376, World Trade Institute.
    11. Piero Morseletto & Frank Biermann & Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 655-676, October.
    12. Wei Chien Ng & Yu Qing Soong & Sin Yin Teh, 2026. "The Application of TRIZ in Resolving the Indo‐Pacific Economic Framework Paradox," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 189(1), January.
    13. Robert Gampfer, 2016. "Minilateralism or the UNFCCC? The Political Feasibility of Climate Clubs," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 62-88, August.
    14. Bolay, Matthieu & Knierzinger, Johannes & Pastré, Paule, 2026. "Investor-state dispute settlement in the extractives: the contentious politics of exit over redistribution, anti-racism, and climate policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140158, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Jan Kersting & Vicki Duscha & Matthias Weitzel, 2017. "Cooperation on Climate Change under Economic Linkages: How the Inclusion of Macroeconomic Effects Affects Stability of a Global Climate Coalition," The Energy Journal, , vol. 38(4), pages 19-42, July.
    16. Harro Asselt & Fariborz Zelli, 2014. "Connect the dots: managing the fragmentation of global climate governance," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 16(2), pages 137-155, April.
    17. Phillip M. Hannam & Vítor V. Vasconcelos & Simon A. Levin & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2017. "Incomplete cooperation and co-benefits: deepening climate cooperation with a proliferation of small agreements," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 65-79, September.
    18. Robert Basedow, 2021. "The EU's International Investment Policy ten years on: the Policy‐Making Implications of Unintended Competence Transfers," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 643-660, May.
    19. Phillips, Sara K., 2025. "The legal construct of mining conflicts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Alessandra Arcuri & Kyla Tienhaara & Lorenzo Pellegrini, 2024. "Investment law v. supply-side climate policies: insights from Rockhopper v. Italy and Lone Pine v. Canada," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 193-216, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:798-810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.