IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i6p2040-2057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the basis of risk: How screen executives’ risk perceptions and practices drive gender inequality in directing

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Coles
  • Doris Ruth Eikhof

Abstract

This paper explores how gendered perceptions of risk drive gender inequality. It does so by applying an Intersectional Risk Theory (IRT) framework to new empirical data on gender equality initiatives in the Canadian screen industries. The paper shows (1) that gendered risk perceptions constrain women directors’ work opportunities; (2) that the construction of gendered risk perceptions (“doing risk”) is shaped by the screen industry context and social inequalities generally; and (3) that practices of constructing risk perceptions can be disrupted and changed, which creates opportunities for a “re‐doing” or “un‐doing” of gendered perceptions of risk and offers new analytical perspectives onto the efficacy of gender equality initiatives. By interrogating how perceptions of risk inform decision‐making, the paper contributes new understandings of the drivers of systemic and intersectional inequality as a defining characteristic of work and labor markets in the screen industries and in the creative industries more broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Coles & Doris Ruth Eikhof, 2021. "On the basis of risk: How screen executives’ risk perceptions and practices drive gender inequality in directing," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 2040-2057, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:2040-2057
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gihoon Hong & Soyoung Kim & Geunhwan Park & Seung-Gyu Sim, 2019. "Female Education Externality and Inclusive Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Axel Haunschild & Doris Ruth Eikhof, 2009. "From HRM to Employment Rules and Lifestyles. Theory Development through Qualitative Case Study Research into the Creative Industries," Zeitschrift fuer Personalforschung. German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(2), pages 107-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeria Pulignano & Deborah Dean & Markieta Domecka & Lander Vermeerbergen, 2023. "How state influence on project work organization both drives and mitigates gendered precarity in cultural and creative industries," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 313-335, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amaia Altuzarra & Catalina Gálvez-Gálvez & Ana González-Flores, 2021. "Is Gender Inequality a Barrier to Economic Growth? A Panel Data Analysis of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Helene Mayerhofer & Barbara Mueller & Angelika Schmidt, 2010. "Implications of Flexpatriates’ Lifestyles on HRM Practices," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 21(2), pages 155-173.
    3. Homero Rodríguez-Insuasti & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Otto Suárez-Rodríguez & Marcela Yonfá-Medranda & Katherine Parrales-Guerrero, 2022. "Creative Economy: A Worldwide Research in Business, Management and Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Jusaj Yvesa & Fetai Besnik, 2022. "Does Female Education Generate Economic Growth? An Empirical Analysis of Western Balkan Countries," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 67(1), pages 1-10, April.
    5. Kiran Zahra & Mudassar Yasin & Baserat Sultana & Zulqarnain Haider & Raheela Khatoon, 2021. "Impact of Women Education on Economic Growth: An Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 3(2), pages 113-120.
    6. Jakob Dirksen & Sabina Alkire, 2021. "Children and Multidimensional Poverty: Four Measurement Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-36, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:2040-2057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.