IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i3p917-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feminist solidarity building as embodied agonism: An ethnographic account of a protest movement

Author

Listed:
  • Sanela Smolović Jones
  • Nik Winchester
  • Caroline Clarke

Abstract

Feminist solidarity, after early and idealistic conceptions of an all‐encompassing sisterhood, has become preoccupied with understanding and theorizing differences between women. This study develops an account of solidarity as embodied agonism, where difference and contest are experienced and negotiated through the body. Difference and contest are reframed within feminist solidarity projects as resources for, rather than inhibitors to, generating collective agency. This is done through an ethnography of a protest movement in Montenegro, which drew together diverse groups of women, and bring our data into conversation with theories of agonistic democratic practice and embodied performativity. Embodied agonistic solidarity is theorized as a participative and inclusive endeavour driven by conflictual encounters, constituted through the bodies, language and visual imagery of assembling and articulating subjects. Our account of solidarity is presented as constituted through three dimensions, each of which represents a different emphasis on sensory experience: exposing, which is to make one's body open to the hardship of others, enabling alliances between unlikely allies to emerge; citing, which is to draw on others’ symbolic resources and to publicly affirm them; inhabiting, which is to embody the deprivations of others, enabling alliances to grow and persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanela Smolović Jones & Nik Winchester & Caroline Clarke, 2021. "Feminist solidarity building as embodied agonism: An ethnographic account of a protest movement," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 917-934, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:917-934
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12453
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl Rhodes & Geraint Harvey, 2012. "Agonism and the Possibilities of Ethics for HRM," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 49-59, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina Buchely & Manuel Pinzón, 2024. "Counter‐powers. The daily life of transitional justice: Women, songs and resistance in Bellavista, Bojayá," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 59-74, January.
    2. George Kandathil & Rajeshwari Chennangodu, 2024. "Postfeminist individuating of a women collective and the strugglesome emergence of a relational collective feminist solidarity: The story of Kudumbashree, a Kerala state‐instituted women empowerment p," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 115-132, January.
    3. Amy Kipp & Roberta Hawkins, 2022. "From the nice work to the hard work: “Troubling” community‐based CareMongering during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1293-1313, July.
    4. Tommy Jensen & Yashar Mahmud, 2024. "Poetic encounters in field work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 305-318, January.
    5. Léa Dorion, 2024. "Why are conflicts about race a point of no return for feminist organizations?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 192-210, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Afshin Omidi & Cinzia Dal Zotto, 2022. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. De Prins, Peggy & Van Beirendonck, Lou & De Vos, Ans & Segers, Jesse, 2014. "Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)’-model," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 25(4), pages 263-284.
    3. Geraint Harvey & Andy Hodder & Stephen Brammer, 2017. "Trade union participation in CSR deliberation: an evaluation," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 42-55, January.
    4. Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar & Fahreen Alamgir, 2018. "Ethics of Resistance in Organisations: A Conceptual Proposal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-43, April.
    5. Michelle Greenwood & Harry J. Van Buren, 2017. "Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 663-678, June.
    6. Kostas Amiridis & Bogdan Costea, 2020. "Managerial Appropriations of the Ethos of Democratic Practice: Rating, ‘Policing’, and Performance Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 701-713, July.
    7. George Kandathil & Jerome Joseph, 2019. "Normative Underpinnings of Direct Employee Participation Studies and Implications for Developing Ethical Reflexivity: A Multidisciplinary Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 685-697, July.
    8. Gazi Islam, 2020. "Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Charles Barthold & Peter Bloom, 2020. "Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 671-681, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:917-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.