IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v21y2022i3p64-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uptake of Ecological Farming Practices by EU Farms: A Pan‐European Typology

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Rega
  • Bethan Thompson
  • Andreas Niedermayr
  • Yann Desjeux
  • Jochen Kantelhardt
  • Riccardo D’Alberto
  • Penelope Gouta
  • Vasilia Konstantidelli
  • Lena Schaller
  • Laure Latruffe
  • Maria Luisa Paracchini

Abstract

Understanding and measuring the sustainability of farms is key to evaluating progress towards policy goals for a more sustainable agriculture. In the LIFT project, a farm typology was developed to classify farms according to their ecological performance, based on farm‐level variables from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Selected variables are used to assess three key ecological dimensions of farming: total input intensity; degree of circularity (reliance on own‐produced versus external inputs); and avoidance of the use of specific inputs of concern for the environment and consumers. The combination of these aspects is considered as a measure of the farm proximity to a full agroecological approach. The typology allows comparison of farms across farm types, countries and years. We briefly present the method and discuss two key aspects: 1) how the proposed farm typology can inform policymaking in the context of a new EU policy framework; 2) how it can inform the foreseen transformation of the FADN into a Farm Sustainability Data Network (FSDN). We suggest that the use of a typology approach under the new FSDN provides useful information on the impacts of the implementation of agroecological practices with an acceptable additional effort in terms of data collection. Pour évaluer les progrès vers les objectifs de politique d’une agriculture plus durable, il est essentiel de comprendre et de mesurer la durabilité des exploitations agricoles. Dans le projet LIFT, une typologie a été développée pour classer les exploitations en fonction de leur performance écologique, sur la base des variables disponibles au niveau individuel dans le Réseau d'information comptable agricole (RICA). Des variables choisies sont utilisées pour évaluer trois dimensions écologiques clés de l'agriculture : l'intensité totale des intrants ; le degré de circularité (dépendance vis‐à‐vis des intrants produits sur la ferme par rapport aux intrants externes) ; et éviter l'utilisation d'intrants spécifiques préoccupants pour l'environnement et les consommateurs. La combinaison de ces aspects est considérée comme une mesure de la proximité de l'exploitation avec une approche agroécologique complète. La typologie permet de comparer les exploitations selon le type, le pays et les années. Nous présentons brièvement la méthode et examinons deux aspects clés : 1) comment la typologie agricole proposée peut éclairer l'élaboration des politiques dans le contexte d'un nouveau cadre pour la politique de l'Union européenne ; et 2) comment elle peut éclairer la transformation prévue du RICA en un réseau de données sur la durabilité agricole (FSDN). Nous suggérons que l'utilisation d'une approche typologique dans le cadre du nouveau FSDN fournit des informations utiles sur les impacts de la mise en œuvre des pratiques agroécologiques demandant un effort supplémentaire acceptable en termes de collecte de données. Das Verständnis und die Erfassung der Nachhaltigkeit von landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben ist der Schlüssel zur Bewertung von Fortschritten bei der Verwirklichung der politischen Ziele für eine nachhaltigere Landwirtschaft. Im Rahmen des LIFT‐Projekts wurde eine Betriebstypologie entwickelt, um Betriebe nach ihrer ökologischen Leistung zu klassifizieren, basierend auf Variablen auf Betriebsebene aus dem Informationsnetz landwirtschaftlicher Buchführungen (INLB). Anhand ausgewählter Variablen werden drei wichtige ökologische Dimensionen der Landwirtschaft bewertet: die Gesamtintensität des Inputs, der Grad der Kreislaufwirtschaft (Abhängigkeit von selbst erzeugten gegenüber externen Inputs) und die Vermeidung des Einsatzes bestimmter Inputs, die für die Umwelt und die Verbraucher von Bedeutung sind. Die Kombination dieser Dimensionen wird als Maß für die Nähe des Betriebs zu einem vollständig agrarökologischen Ansatz betrachtet. Die Typologie ermöglicht den Vergleich von Betrieben zwischen verschiedenen Betriebstypen, Ländern und Jahren. Wir stellen die Methode kurz vor und erörtern zwei wichtige Aspekte: 1) wie die vorgeschlagene Betriebstypologie die politische Entscheidungsfindung im Kontext eines neuen politischen Rahmens der EU unterstützen kann; 2) wie sie die geplante Umwandlung des INLB in ein Informationsnetz für Nachhaltigkeitsdaten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe (INNLB) unterstützen kann. Wir weisen darauf hin, dass die Anwendung eines Typologieansatzes im Rahmen des neuen INNLB nützliche Informationen über die Auswirkungen der Umsetzung agrarökologischer Praktiken mit einem vertretbaren Mehraufwand bei der Datenerhebung liefert.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Rega & Bethan Thompson & Andreas Niedermayr & Yann Desjeux & Jochen Kantelhardt & Riccardo D’Alberto & Penelope Gouta & Vasilia Konstantidelli & Lena Schaller & Laure Latruffe & Maria Luisa Para, 2022. "Uptake of Ecological Farming Practices by EU Farms: A Pan‐European Typology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 64-71, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:64-71
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tittonell, P. & Bruzzone, O. & Solano-Hernández, A. & López-Ridaura, S. & Easdale, M.H., 2020. "Functional farm household typologies through archetypal responses to disturbances," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Gobin & Ann Van Herzele, 2023. "A Data-Driven Farm Typology as a Basis for Agricultural Land Use Decisions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Netshipale, A.J. & Raidimi, E.N. & Mashiloane, M.L. & de Boer, I.J.M. & Oosting, S.J., 2022. "Farming system diversity and its drivers in land reform farms of the Waterberg District, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Solano-Hernandez, A. & Bruzzone, O. & Groot, J. & Laborda, L. & Martínez, A. & Tittonell, P. & Easdale, M.H., 2020. "Convergence between satellite information and farmers’ perception of drought in rangelands of North-West Patagonia, Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Tessier, Louis & Bijttebier, Jo & Marchand, Fleur & Baret, Philippe V., 2021. "Identifying the farming models underlying Flemish beef farmers' practices from an agroecological perspective with archetypal analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Matthew C. LaFevor, 2022. "Characterizing Agricultural Diversity with Policy-Relevant Farm Typologies in Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, August.
    5. El Mujtar, Verónica Andrea & Zamor, Ronie & Salmerón, Francisco & Guerrero, Adela del Socorro & Laborda, Luciana & Tittonell, Pablo & Hogan, Rose, 2023. "Lexical analysis improves the identification of contextual drivers and farm typologies in the assessment of transitions to agroecology through TAPE – A case study from rural Nicaragua," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Aubron, Claire & Vigne, Mathieu & Philippon, Olivier & Lucas, Corentin & Lesens, Pierre & Upton, Spencer & Salgado, Paulo & Ruiz, Laurent, 2021. "Nitrogen metabolism of an Indian village based on the comparative agriculture approach: How characterizing social diversity was essential for understanding crop-livestock integration," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Périnelle, Anne & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Scopel, Eric, 2021. "Combining on-farm innovation tracking and participatory prototyping trials to develop legume-based cropping systems in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:64-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.