IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v90y2014i288p63-89.html

Evaluating the Evidence on Income Inequality in Australia in the 2000s

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Wilkins

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecor12090-abs-0001"> Published ABS data from the Survey of Income and Housing (SIH) show a substantial increase in income inequality between 2001 and 2010. However, almost all of the increase occurred over a period when changes in survey methodology and income concept were occurring. I present results of analysis of the SIH unit record data, as well as independent evidence provided by the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. On the basis of this analysis, I conclude that the SIH overstates the growth in income inequality, even when the income variable examined is notionally consistently defined across surveys. The extent of overstatement is, however, uncertain. Furthermore, it is likely that the picture provided by the SIH data in 2010 is more accurate than the picture provided by the SIH data in 2001 – that is, the ABS is now better measuring income in its household income surveys. Therefore, measured inequality at the start of the decade was too low, rather than measured inequality at the end of the decade being too high.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Wilkins, 2014. "Evaluating the Evidence on Income Inequality in Australia in the 2000s," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 90(288), pages 63-89, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:90:y:2014:i:288:p:63-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecor.2014.90.issue-288
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arturo Martinez Jr. & Tina Rampino & Mark Western & Wojtek Tomaszewski & Jude David Roque, 2017. "Estimating the Contribution of Circumstances that Reflect Inequality of Opportunities," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(4), pages 380-400, December.
    2. Amy Beech & Rosetta Dollman & Richard Finlay & Gianni La Cava, 2014. "The Distribution of Household Spending in Australia," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 13-22, March.
    3. Greg Kaplan & Gianni La Cava & Tahlee Stone, 2018. "Household Economic Inequality in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(305), pages 117-134, June.
    4. Nicholas Biddle & Maxine Montaigne, 2017. "Income Inequality in Australia – Decomposing by City and Suburb," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(4), pages 367-379, December.
    5. Nicolas Herault & Francisco Azpitarte, 2016. "Understanding Changes in the Distribution and Redistribution of Income: A Unifying Decomposition Framework," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(2), pages 266-282, June.
    6. Kennedy, Tom & Smyth, Russell & Valadkhani, Abbas & Chen, George, 2017. "Does income inequality hinder economic growth? New evidence using Australian taxation statistics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 119-128.
    7. Jeff Borland & Michael Coelli, 2016. "Labour Market Inequality in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 92(299), pages 517-547, December.
    8. David Gunawan & William E. Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2020. "Posterior Probabilities for Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance of Australian Income Distributions," Papers 2005.04870, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    9. Peter Saunders & Yuvisthi Naidoo, 2018. "Mapping the Australian Poverty Profile: A Multidimensional Deprivation Approach," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 51(3), pages 336-350, September.
    10. Silvia Mendolia & Peter Siminski, 2016. "New Estimates of Intergenerational Mobility in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 92(298), pages 361-373, September.
    11. Gunasinghe, Chandika & Selvanathan, E.A. & Naranpanawa, Athula & Forster, John, 2020. "The impact of fiscal shocks on real GDP and income inequality: What do Australian data say?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 250-270.
    12. Arpita Chatterjee & Aarti Singh & Tahlee Stone, 2016. "Understanding Wage Inequality in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 92(298), pages 348-360, September.
    13. Jinjing Li & Hai Anh La & Denisa M. Sologon, 2021. "Policy, Demography, and Market Income Volatility: What Shaped Income Distribution and Inequality in Australia Between 2002 and 2016?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(1), pages 196-221, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:90:y:2014:i:288:p:63-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.