IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v41y2023i6ne12719.html

Does Thinking and Working Politically improve support for social business? Evidence from a water business in Cambodia

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Lyne

Abstract

Motivation Social business is business that aims primarily to achieve social ends, while at least covering its costs. Social business has been put forward as a means to achieve development aims, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) is an approach to ensure development interventions are politically feasible and not stymied by political opposition. Are the two approaches compatible? Purpose The article asks whether social business can ally with TWP for more effective development, taking a social business for water provision in Cambodia as a case in point. Methods and approach A review of development policy literature on social business and TWP is combined with data we collected from fieldwork in Cambodia from November 2018 to February 2019. We interviewed key informants from social business, UNICEF, and government in the capital. At two water kiosks in eastern Cambodia, one successful the other less so, we interviewed 2 kiosk operators, 20 customers, and local leaders; we held four focus groups of customers; and we observed operations at the kiosks. Data was analysed using an ethnographic, or immersive, qualitative approach. Findings In this case, UNICEF intuitively used TWP to connect a social business to government departments. Water kiosks depended heavily on local political dynamics. We found Commune officials mindful of their standing in local society who often had the interests of the local community in their hearts, but the compatibility of TWP and social business at the local project level is variable. Policy implications TWP can potentially help development actors supporting social business to make political connections, in this case to appropriate government departments and local official. The key, however, is to understand context. The danger is to view social business as a turnkey intervention that can be used without adaptation to context, without consideration of local politics. Donors supporting social business need to appraise each business, case by case. Donors might also want to consider the motivations of international companies partnering with social business, particularly when different development objectives might be in conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Lyne, 2023. "Does Thinking and Working Politically improve support for social business? Evidence from a water business in Cambodia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(6), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:6:n:e12719
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12719
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Mustafizur Rahaman & Niaz Ahmed Khan, 2017. "Making international aid effective: An agenda for aligning aid to social business," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 96-117, October.
    2. Kees Biekart & Erik Swyngedouw, 2013. "UN Water Report 2012: Depoliticizing Water," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(3), pages 823-835, May.
    3. Stefan Gold & Ilma Nur Chowdhury & Fahian Anisul Huq & Kristin Heinemann, 2020. "Social business collaboration at the bottom of the pyramid: The case of orchestration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 262-275, January.
    4. Shahriar Akter & Nabila Jamal & Md Mahfuz Ashraf & Grace McCarthy & PS Varsha, 2020. "The Rise of the Social Business in Emerging Economies: A New Paradigm of Development," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 282-299, September.
    5. Muhammad Yunus & Mario Biggeri & Enrico Testi, 2021. "Social Economy and Social Business Supporting Policies for Sustainable Human Development in a Post-COVID-19 World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2010. "The politics of narrating social entrepreneurship," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 85-108, March.
    7. Angela Hoyos & Diego F. Angel‐Urdinola, 2019. "Assessing international organizations’ support to social enterprise," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(S2), pages 213-229, July.
    8. Gerard Clarke, 2021. "“Thinking and Working Politically”: The case of donor‐supported reform coalitions in the Philippines," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(3), pages 398-418, May.
    9. Neil McCulloch & Laure‐Hélène Piron, 2019. "Thinking and Working Politically: Learning from practice. Overview to Special Issue," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(S1), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manning, Stephan & Vavilov, Stanislav, 2023. "Global development agenda meets local opportunities: The rise of development-focused entrepreneurship support," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    2. Nelly Oelze & Tim Gruchmann & Marcus Brandenburg, 2020. "Motivating Factors for Implementing Apparel Certification Schemes—A Sustainable Supply Chain Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Amalesh Sharma & Sourav Bikash Borah & Aditya Christopher Moses, 2024. "Achieving social and economic sustainability through innovations in transformative services: A case of healthcare organizations in an emerging market," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1366-1390, October.
    4. Aidan Craney, 2020. "Local Participation or Elite Capture in Sheep’s Clothing? A Conundrum of Locally Led Development," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 191-200.
    5. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Water, Infrastructure and Power: Contention and Resistance in Post‐colonial Cities of the South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1616-1630, November.
    6. Chris Roche & John Cox & Mereani Rokotuibau & Peni Tawake & Yeshe Smith, 2020. "The Characteristics of Locally Led Development in the Pacific," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 136-146.
    7. Valero, Diana & Cook, Jess & Lee, Angus & Browne, Alison L. & Ellis, Rowan & Pancholi, Vidya Sagar & Hoolohan, Claire, 2023. "Addressing water poverty under climate crisis: implications for social policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Kearrin Sims, 2021. "Risk navigation for Thinking and Working Politically: The work and disappearance of Sombath Somphone," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(4), pages 604-620, July.
    9. Ranjit Gupta & Cristian Mejia & Shuan Sadreghazi & Yuki Sano & Leticia Sarmento Dos Muchangos & Tomonori Sekiguchi & Hiromi Nakamura & Yuya Kajikawa, 2024. "Traders as ecosystem orchestrators for sustainable foods supply chain transformation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4024-4038, July.
    10. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Lin, Feng-Jyh & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2021. "The effect of social mission on service quality and brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 744-752.
    11. Pattanayak, Sirsha & Ramkumar, M. & Goswami, Mohit & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Blockchain technology and supply chain performance: The role of trust and relational capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    12. Hangala Siachiwena, 2023. "International donors, domestic politics, and the expansion of social cash transfers in Malawi," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    13. Nadia Zahoor & Ali Meftah Gerged, 2021. "Relational capital, environmental knowledge integration, and environmental performance of small and medium enterprises in emerging markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3789-3803, December.
    14. Sabrina Rondeau & Sara M. Stricker & Chantel Kozachenko & Kate Parizeau, 2020. "Understanding Motivations for Volunteering in Food Insecurity and Food Upcycling Projects," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Murat Arsel & Joshua Muldavin, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 993-1009, July.
    16. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Bommier, Swann & Renouard, Cécile, 2014. "On Equity in India's Water Supply Public-Private Partnerships," ESSEC Working Papers WP1411, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    18. Amouri, Abdellatif & Festa, Giuseppe & Shams, S.M. Riad & Sakka, Georgia & Rossi, Matteo, 2021. "Technological propensity, financial constraints, and entrepreneurial limits in young entrepreneurs’ social business enterprises: The tunisian experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Ritesh Shahi & Nadiya Parekh, 2022. "Financing Social Enterprises: An Upper Echelon Perspective," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 235-250, June.
    20. Soni, Gunjan & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Singh, Pallavi & Dey, Bidit L. & Dora, Manoj, 2021. "Technological interventions in social business: Mapping current research and establishing future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:6:n:e12719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.