IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v31y2000i1p11-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Discourses and Peasant–Forest Relations: Natural Resource Utilization as Social Process

Author

Listed:
  • Anja Nygren

Abstract

This article analyses the changing role of forests and the practices of peasants toward them in a Costa Rican rural community, drawing on an analytical perspective of political ecology, combined with cultural interpretations. The study underlines the complex articulation of local processes and global forces in tropical forest struggles. Deforestation is seen as a process of development and power involving multiple social actors, from politicians and development experts to a heterogeneous group of local peasants. The local people are not passive victims of global challenges, but are instead directly involved in the changes concerning their production systems and livelihood strategies. In the light of historical changes in natural resource utilization, the article underlines the multiplicity of the causes of tropical deforestation, and the intricate links between global discourses on environment and development and local forest relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anja Nygren, 2000. "Development Discourses and Peasant–Forest Relations: Natural Resource Utilization as Social Process," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 31(1), pages 11-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:31:y:2000:i:1:p:11-34
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-7660.00145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evangelia Apostolopoulou & John D Pantis, 2010. "Development Plans versus Conservation: Explanation of Emergent Conflicts and State Political Handling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 982-1000, April.
    2. Nygren, Anja, 2005. "Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 639-655, April.
    3. Leipold, Sina, 2014. "Creating forests with words — A review of forest-related discourse studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 12-20.
    4. David Humphreys, 2016. "Integers, integrants and normative vectors: The limitations of environmental policy integration under neoliberalism," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 433-447, May.
    5. Floriane Clement, 2010. "Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(2), pages 129-156, June.
    6. Julia A. Flagg, 2018. "Carbon Neutral by 2021: The Past and Present of Costa Rica’s Unusual Political Tradition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Holmes-Watts, Tania & Watts, Scotney, 2008. "Legal frameworks for and the practice of participatory natural resources management in South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(7-8), pages 435-443, October.
    8. Van Hecken, Gert & Merlet, Pierre & Lindtner, Mara & Bastiaensen, Johan, 2019. "Can Financial Incentives Change Farmers' Motivations? An Agrarian System Approach to Development Pathways at the Nicaraguan Agricultural Frontier," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 519-529.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:31:y:2000:i:1:p:11-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.