IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v13y2005i2p127-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Revised OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and their Relevance to Non‐OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Fianna Jesover
  • Grant Kirkpatrick

Abstract

The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance were revised in 2004 to respond to corporate governance developments including corporate scandals that further focused the minds of governments on improving corporate governance practices. Since they were first issued in 1999, the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance have gained worldwide recognition as an international benchmark for sound corporate governance. They are actively used by governments, regulators, investors, corporations and stakeholders in both OECD and non‐OECD countries and have been adopted by the Financial Stability Forum as one of the Twelve Key Standards for Sound Financial Systems. The 2004 revision of the OECD Principles reflects not only the experience of OECD countries but also that of emerging and developing economies. This article shows how the revised Principles take into account recent lessons from non‐OECD countries so that they continue to maintain their global relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Fianna Jesover & Grant Kirkpatrick, 2005. "The Revised OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and their Relevance to Non‐OECD Countries," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 127-136, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:13:y:2005:i:2:p:127-136
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00412.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00412.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00412.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnibho Roy & Abhishek Mohan, 2017. "An Optimized Microeconomic Modeling System for Analyzing Industrial Externalities in Non-OECD Countries," Papers 1710.02755, arXiv.org.
    2. Esen KARA & Duygu ACAR ERDUR & Lale KARABIYIK, 2015. "Effects Of Corporate Governance Level On The Financial Performance Of Companies: A Research On BIST Corporate Governance Index (XKURY)," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 15(2), pages 265-274.
    3. Christopher Hansen & Joern Block & Matthias Neuenkirch, 2020. "Family Firm Performance Over The Business Cycle: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 476-511, July.
    4. Michele Pizzo, 2013. "Related party transactions under a contingency perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(2), pages 309-330, May.
    5. Edward Kassem & Oldrich Trenz, 2020. "Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Bok Gyo Jeong & Seongho An & Geiguen Shin, 2024. "Mapping policy agenda in international development: Reflections on OECD Development Centre Working Papers from 1990 to 2017," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 502-523, January.
    7. Nebert Mandala & E. Kaijage & J. Aduda & C. Iraya, 2018. "The Effect of Board Structure and CEO Tenure on Performance of Financial Institutions in Kenya," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4.
    8. Victor Chen & Jing Li & Daniel Shapiro, 2011. "Are OECD-prescribed “good corporate governance practices” really good in an emerging economy?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 115-138, March.
    9. Dumitrascu Luminita Mihaela, 2012. "The Sound Of Corporate Governance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 921-924, July.
    10. Nebert Mandala & E. Kaijage & J. Aduda & C. Iraya, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Board Structure and Performance of Financial Institutions in Kenya," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-3.
    11. Ruxandra-Adriana MATEESCU, 2015. "Institutional Investors And Corporate Governance," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 7, pages 369-374, April.
    12. ATM Adnan & Nisar Ahmed, 2019. "The Transformation Of The Corporate Governance Model: A Literature Review," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(3), pages 7-47.
    13. Berna Doğan Başar & Ahmed Bouteska & Burak Büyükoğlu & İbrahim Halil Ekşi, 2021. "The effect of corporate governance on bank performance: evidence from Turkish and some MENA countries banks," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 153-162, May.
    14. Themistokles Lazarides, 2010. "Corporate governance law effect in Greece," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 370-385, November.
    15. SherienMamounSayedAhmed Mohamed, 2020. "The Role of Internal Control System in Activating Corporate Governance (Field Study in National Audit Chamber)," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 398414-3984, December.
    16. Aysegul ERTUGRUL, 2023. "Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Insurance Companies with Panel Regression Analysis," Journal of BRSA Banking and Financial Markets, Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency, vol. 17(1), pages 107-130.
    17. Marghoob Enam & Syed Noorul Shajar & Niladri Das, 2023. "Non-Monotonic Relationship between Corporate Governance and Banks’ Operating Performance—The Moderating Role of CEO Duality: Evidence from Selected Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Shakti Deb & Indrajit Dube, 2017. "Corporate Governance Disclosure for Complex Ownership Structure in India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(2), pages 143-175, December.
    19. Dima Jamali & Asem M. Safieddine & Myriam Rabbath, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 443-459, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:13:y:2005:i:2:p:127-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.