IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/buecrs/v68y2016is1p133-145.html

Nesting Vertical And Horizontal Differentiation In Two-Sided Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Vitor Miguel Ribeiro
  • João Correia-da-Silva
  • Joana Resende

Abstract

We develop a model that is a synthesis of the two-sided markets duopoly model of Armstrong (2006) with the nested vertical and horizontal di erentiation model of Gabszewicz and Wauthy (2012), which consists of a linear city with di erent consumer densities on the left and on the right side of the city. In equilibrium, the high-quality platform sells at a higher price and captures a greater market share than the low-quality platform, despite the indiff erent consumer being closer to the high-quality platform. The di fference between market shares is lower than socially optimal, because of the inter-group externality and because the high-quality platform sells at a higher price. We conclude that a perturbation that introduces a negligible di erence between the consumer density on the left and on the right side of the city may disrupt the existence of equilibrium in the model of Armstrong (2006). Finally, we show that inter-group externalities make it easier to deter an inferior-quality entrant and make it easier for a superior-quality entrant to conquer the market.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & João Correia-da-Silva & Joana Resende, 2016. "Nesting Vertical And Horizontal Differentiation In Two-Sided Markets," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(S1), pages 133-145, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:68:y:2016:i:s1:p:133-145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/boer.2016.68.issue-S1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nestor Duch-Brown, 2017. "Quality discrimination in online multi-sided markets," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2017-06, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Man Wang & Honghui Deng & Keong G. Leong, 2023. "Innovation investment and subsidy strategy in two-sided market," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 337-351, December.
    3. Debora Di Gioacchino & Alina Verashchagina, 2017. "Mass media and attitudes to inequality," Working Papers in Public Economics 178, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Roma.
    4. Di Gioacchino, Debora & Verashchagina, Alina, 2020. "Mass media and preferences for redistribution," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Maria Rosa Battaggion & Serena Marianna Drufuca, 2020. "Quality competition and entry: a media market case," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 1-36, June.
    6. Ribeiro, Vitor Miguel & Soares, Isabel, 2025. "A primer on verti-zontally differentiated peer-to-peer energy intraday trading platforms with and without customization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    7. Luigi Serio & Piero Tedeschi & Giovanni Ursino, 2018. "Making Sense of (Ultra) Low-Cost Flights Vertical Differentiation in Two-Sided Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 401-420, January.
    8. Sangita Poddar & Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee) & Swapnendu Banerjee, 2024. "A theoretical analysis on two‐sided duopoly platforms and tax regimes," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 20(1), pages 88-119, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D42 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Monopoly
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:68:y:2016:i:s1:p:133-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0307-3378 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.