IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v11y2002i3p181-202.html

Internet use for corporate environmental reporting: current challenges—technical benefits—practical guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Ralf Isenmann
  • Christian Lenz

Abstract

The huge opportunities of using the internet for corporate reporting are arranged in a comprehensive system of technical benefits. In order to give a tangible example and describe practical use thoroughly, the benefits are focused on environmental reporting but they can be transferred in major parts also to financial, social or sustainability reporting—seen as a currently emerging trend towards integrated financial, environmental and social reporting. In more detail, the system of internet‐specific benefits is illustrated by four main categories: benefits concerning the underlying purposes of publishing reports, benefits concerning the entire reporting process, benefits concerning the report contents and benefits concerning the report design. In terms of corporate reporting, professional internet use will enhance the way in which companies give information, communicate and manage their business internally and externally, benefiting all members involved that are reporting companies, addressed key target groups and other stakeholders such as standard setting institutions and benchmarking organizations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

Suggested Citation

  • Ralf Isenmann & Christian Lenz, 2002. "Internet use for corporate environmental reporting: current challenges—technical benefits—practical guidance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 181-202, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:181-202
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.329
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas J. Lober & David Bynum & Elizabeth Campbell & Mary Jacques, 1997. "The 100 plus corporate environmental report study: A survey of an evolving environmental management tool," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 57-73, May.
    2. David Wheeler & John Elkington, 2001. "The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annalisa Baldissera, 2023. "Sustainability reporting in banks: History of studies and a conceptual framework for thinking about the future by learning from the past," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2385-2405, September.
    2. Ylva Stiller & Claus‐Heinrich Daub, 2007. "Paving the way for sustainability communication: evidence from a Swiss study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 474-486, November.
    3. Irja Vormedal & Audun Ruud, 2009. "Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio‐political drivers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 207-222, May.
    4. Ralf Isenmann & Christoph Bey & Markus Welter, 2007. "Online reporting for sustainability issues," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 487-501, November.
    5. J. Emil Morhardt, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(7), pages 436-452, November.
    6. Wendy Stubbs & Colin Higgins & Markus Milne, 2013. "Why Do Companies Not Produce Sustainability Reports?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(7), pages 456-470, November.
    7. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Peck & Knud Sinding, 2003. "Environmental and social disclosure and data richness in the mining industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 131-146, May.
    2. Dror Etzion & Fabrizio Ferraro, 2010. "The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1092-1107, October.
    3. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    4. R. Scott Marshall & Darrell Brown, 2003. "Corporate environmental reporting: what's in a metric?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 87-106, March.
    5. Ourvashi Bissoon, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility in Mauritius: an analysis of annual reports of multinational hotel groups," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Hadrian Gery Djajadikerta & Terri Trireksani, 2012. "Corporate social and environmental disclosure by Indonesian listed companies on their corporate web sites," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 21-36, May.
    7. Bryan Ogden, 2015. "Short Form Videos for Sustainability Communication," MIC 2015: Managing Sustainable Growth; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Portorož, Slovenia, 28–30 May 2015,, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    8. Claudio Vitari & Isabelle Bourdon & Florence Rodhain, 2017. "Les systèmes de communication Internet des entreprises du CAC40 : une étude longitudinale (2007-2015)," Post-Print halshs-01923267, HAL.
    9. Huriye SABANCI ÖZER, 2012. "A Review of the Literature on Process Innovation in Remanufacturing," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 2(3), pages 139-155.
    10. Shafat Maqbool & M. Nasir Zamir, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in India: A Study of SENSEX Companies," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 209-223, May.
    11. Cho, Charles H. & Roberts, Robin W., 2010. "Environmental reporting on the internet by America's Toxic 100: Legitimacy and self-presentation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16.
    12. O'Dwyer, Brendan & Owen, David L., 2005. "Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 205-229.
    13. A. D. Martin & D. J. Hadley, 2008. "Corporate environmental non‐reporting – a UK FTSE 350 perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(4), pages 245-259, May.
    14. Pamela Edwards & Frank K. Birkin & David G. Woodward, 2002. "Financial comparability and environmental diversity: an international context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(6), pages 343-359, November.
    15. Gianpaolo Tomaselli & Monia Melia, 2014. "The Role Of Interactive Technologies For Csr Communication," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 8(1), pages 324-340.
    16. Lu Yang & Cindy S B Ngai & Wenze Lu, 2020. "Changing trends of corporate social responsibility reporting in the world-leading airlines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Lars Moratis & Satu Brandt, 2017. "Corporate stakeholder responsiveness? Exploring the state and quality of GRI‐based stakeholder engagement disclosures of European firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 312-325, July.
    18. Paola Castellani & Chiara Rossato & Elena Giaretta & Alfonso Vargas-Sánchez, 2024. "Partner selection strategies of SMEs for reaching the Sustainable Development Goals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1317-1352, May.
    19. Giuliano Noci, 2000. "Environmental reporting in Italy: current practice and future developments," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 211-223, July.
    20. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:181-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.