IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i2p1412-1431.html

Effects of Attribution and Auditors' Response Readability of Critical Audit Matter on Audit Quality Perceptions and Valuation Judgements

Author

Listed:
  • Li Huang
  • Fangjun Xiao

Abstract

We investigate how Critical Audit Matter (CAM) attribution and auditors' response readability influence investors' perceptions of audit quality and their valuation revision judgements. Using an experiment with nonprofessional investors, we find that investors perceive the highest audit quality when auditors attribute CAMs to management and provide more readable responses. In addition, given a more readable response, CAM attribution to management leads to more negative valuation revisions than attribution to the nature of accounts through a positive indirect effect and a negative direct effect. Our study contributes to the recent CAM literature and provides implications for regulators, auditors, and investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Huang & Fangjun Xiao, 2026. "Effects of Attribution and Auditors' Response Readability of Critical Audit Matter on Audit Quality Perceptions and Valuation Judgements," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 1412-1431, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1412-1431
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70186
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.70186?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Seebeck & Devrimi Kaya, 2023. "The Power of Words: An Empirical Analysis of the Communicative Value of Extended Auditor Reports," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 1185-1215, October.
    2. Lisa Koonce & Marlys Gascho Lipe, 2010. "Earnings Trend and Performance Relative to Benchmarks: How Consistency Influences Their Joint Use," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 48(4), pages 859-884, September.
    3. Aerts, Walter, 1994. "On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(4-5), pages 337-353.
    4. Barton, Jan & Mercer, Molly, 2005. "To blame or not to blame: Analysts' reactions to external explanations for poor financial performance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 509-533, September.
    5. Jean H. Bédard & Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Alain Schatt, 2019. "Consequences of Expanded Audit Reports : Evidence from the Justifications of Assessments in France," Post-Print hal-02011144, HAL.
    6. Kristina Rennekamp, 2012. "Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 50(5), pages 1319-1354, December.
    7. Chen, Wei & Han, Jun & Tan, Hun-Tong, 2016. "Investor reactions to management earnings guidance attributions: The effects of news valence, attribution locus, and outcome controllability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 83-95.
    8. Haifeng You & Xiao-jun Zhang, 2009. "Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 559-586, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin, Rachel, 2019. "Examination and implications of experimental research on investor perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 145-169.
    2. Chen, Wei & Han, Jun & Tan, Hun-Tong, 2016. "Investor reactions to management earnings guidance attributions: The effects of news valence, attribution locus, and outcome controllability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 83-95.
    3. Grant, Stephanie M. & Hodge, Frank D. & Sinha, Roshan K., 2018. "How disclosure medium affects investor reactions to CEO bragging, modesty, and humblebragging," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 118-134.
    4. Chen, Zhenhua & Loftus, Serena, 2019. "Multi-method evidence on investors’ reactions to managers’ self-inclusive language," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Duan, Mingli, 2025. "The signaling effect of tone: The influence of key audit matters’ tone on bank lending decisions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Lin & Ma, Qianqun & Wu, Chong, 2024. "The impact of financial risk on boilerplate of key audit matters: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    7. Cade, Nicole L., 2018. "Corporate social media: How two-way disclosure channels influence investors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 63-79.
    8. Han, Jun, 2013. "A literature synthesis of experimental studies on management earnings guidance," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 49-70.
    9. Yang, Yanjia & Tan, Hun-Tong, 2024. "What you are versus what you do: The effect of noun-verb framing in earnings conference calls," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Libby, Robert & Rennekamp, Kristina M. & Seybert, Nicholas, 2015. "Regulation and the interdependent roles of managers, auditors, and directors in earnings management and accounting choice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-42.
    11. Emett, Scott A. & Nelson, Mark W., 2017. "Reporting accounting changes and their multi-period effects," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 52-72.
    12. Berkin, Anil & Aerts, Walter & Van Caneghem, Tom, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of machine learning for performance-related attributional statements," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    13. Luo, Xiang & Luo, Yi & Zhou, Jianan, 2025. "The communicative value of key audit matters in M&As: The effect of performance commitments," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    14. Niamh Brennan & Encarna Guillamon-Saorin & Aileen Pierce, 2009. "Impression management : developing and illustrating a scheme of analysis for narrative disclosures – a methodological note," Open Access publications 10197/2905, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    15. Triki, Anis, 2019. "Examining the effect of deception detection decision aids on investors' perceptions of disclosure credibility and willingness to invest," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 1-15.
    16. Xu, Jingjing & Deng, Yingwen & Wen, Lin & Wang, Kuanliang, 2025. "Can auditing facilitate the effective implementation of goodwill accounting? A perspective based on key audit matters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Niamh M. Brennan & Encarna Guillamon‐Saorin & Aileen Pierce, 2009. "Methodological Insights," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(5), pages 789-832, June.
    18. Ye Chen & Naiding Yang, 2023. "The effect of corporate donation motive attribution on investors' judgments of future earnings prospects: The moderating role of individual moral orientation," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 435-453, April.
    19. Asay, H. Scott & Libby, Robert & Rennekamp, Kristina M., 2018. "Do features that associate managers with a message magnify investors’ reactions to narrative disclosures?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 1-14.
    20. Hosseinniakani, Mahmoud & Overland, Conny & Samani, Niuosha, 2024. "Do key audit matters matter? Correspondence between auditor and management disclosures and the role of audit committees," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1412-1431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.