IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/socien/v15y2025i3p53-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding of the socio-economic impact of PAMANA initiatives in conflict-affected areas in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Catada Gapasin Merivic

    (Negros Oriental State University, Negros Oriental)

  • Atillo Abiera Guilbert Nicanor

    (Negros Oriental State University, Negros Oriental)

Abstract

This study examines the socio-economic impact of PAMANA development initiatives in conflict-affected areas of Negros Oriental, Philippines, employing a descriptive survey methodology. It focuses on profiling beneficiary respondents, identifying implementation challenges, and evaluating the projects’ social and economic effects. Despite PAMANA’s implementation since 2016, there has been a lack of comprehensive monitoring and evaluation, which has prompted this research. Coordination meetings with farmer associations and LGUs facilitated data collection using descriptive survey questionnaires from 13 geographically dispersed associations, primarily comprising farmers and active PAMANA participants. Analysis of responses from 272 beneficiaries reveals the challenges faced by beneficiaries of the PAMANA program, including inadequate project monitoring, leadership deficiencies, and communication gaps. The Covid-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these challenges, leading to economic uncertainty among participants. While some respondents reported successful program implementation, a significant portion expressed dissatisfaction with its impact on health services, education, and financial improvement. Addressing these concerns requires a comprehensive approach, including enhancing communication strategies, fostering leadership development, and identifying and rectifying program shortcomings. Overall, the findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve the PAMANA program’s effectiveness in supporting its beneficiaries’ economic and social well-being. Policymakers can use this evidence to formulate policies and strategies grounded in data-driven insights, enhancing the likelihood of achieving desired socio-economic outcomes. Finally, the result provides new empirical evidence and analysis that enriches scholarly understanding of the intersection between development interventions and peacebuilding efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Catada Gapasin Merivic & Atillo Abiera Guilbert Nicanor, 2025. "Understanding of the socio-economic impact of PAMANA initiatives in conflict-affected areas in the Philippines," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(3), pages 53-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjw:socien:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:53-68
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.3.3296.2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en/article/view/3296/2206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.15.3.3296.2025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helitzer, Deborah & Hollis, Christine & Hernandez, Brisa Urquieta de & Sanders, Margaret & Roybal, Suzanne & Van Deusen, Ian, 2010. "Evaluation for community-based programs: The integration of logic models and factor analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 223-233, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Huang & Shen, Jianping & Jones, Jeffrey & Gao, Xingyuan & Zheng, Yunzheng & Krenn, Huilan Y., 2019. "Using logic model and visualization to conduct portfolio evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 69-75.
    2. Clapham, Kathleen & Manning, Claire & Williams, Kathryn & O’Brien, Ginger & Sutherland, Margaret, 2017. "Using a logic model to evaluate the Kids Together early education inclusion program for children with disabilities and additional needs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 96-105.
    3. Fletcher-Hildebrand, Shaneice & Williamson, Linzi & Lawson, Karen & Dell, Colleen, 2023. "Remotely and collaboratively evaluating a campus-based therapy dog program during the COVID-19 pandemic," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Park, Chul Hyun & Welch, Eric W. & Sriraj, P.S., 2016. "An integrative theory-driven framework for evaluating travel training programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 7-20.
    5. Gervais, Christine & de Montigny, Francine & Lacharité, Carl & Dubeau, Diane, 2015. "The Father Friendly Initiative within Families: Using a logic model to develop program theory for a father support program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 133-141.
    6. Ribeiro, Fernando & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of electricity production using a logic models approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 215-223.
    7. Helitzer, Deborah L. & Sussman, Andrew L. & Hoffman, Richard M. & Getrich, Christina M. & Warner, Teddy D. & Rhyne, Robert L., 2014. "Along the way to developing a theory of the program: A re-examination of the conceptual framework as an organizing strategy," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 157-163.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:socien:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:53-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.