IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v11y2026i2p102-123.html

Integrating Biophilic Environmental Design and Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies for Sustainable Economic Development: A Systematic Review of Residential Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Onwukwe, Chukwuemeka Ozioma Stanislaus

    (Department of Architectural Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede-Owerri, Owerri, Imo State.)

  • Diogu, Daniel Uzoma

    (Department of Architectural Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede-Owerri, Owerri, Imo State.)

  • Mezieobi, Chukwuemeka Sunday

    (Department of Architectural Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede-Owerri, Owerri, Imo State.)

  • Onungwa, Uchenna

    (Department of Architectural Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede-Owerri, Owerri, Imo State.)

Abstract

The residential building sector is a critical driver of global sustainability due to its substantial resource consumption, energy demand, impact on human wellbeing, and economic productivity. Biophilic environmental design, which reconnects occupants with natural systems, has been shown to improve indoor environmental quality (IEQ), psychological well-being, and energy performance. Conversely, smart sensors, artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and data-driven building management, which are systems of Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies, can optimise operational efficiency and adaptive building performance. Despite their individual merits, the integration of biophilic design with 4IR technologies remains underexplored, while the evidence on their combined environmental and economic outcomes has remained fragmented. A systematic review methodology, as guided by PRISMA, was adopted to coalesce empirical and theoretical evidence published between 2010 and 2025. Relevant peer-reviewed journals, conference papers, and grey literature were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect using thematic concepts such as “biophilic design,†“4IR technologies,†“smart residential buildings,†and “sustainability.†Inclusion criteria focused on studies that reported environmental and economic outcomes related to residential architecture. Seventy-seven studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined using a Structured Data Extraction Matrix (SDEM). Findings indicate that biophilic/4IR-integrated residential buildings enhance IEQ, thermal comfort, and occupant wellbeing, while optimising energy efficiency, reducing operational costs, and lowering carbon emissions. Comparative and thematic analyses show that these buildings outperform conventional designs in environmental and economic performance and occupant satisfaction. The study recommends that architects, developers, and policymakers focus on integrating biophilic principles with 4IR technologies to achieve sustainable, human-centred residential design. Further empirical research is needed to assess the long-term economic impacts, cost-effectiveness, and policy integration of place-based and data-driven sustainable residential development.

Suggested Citation

  • Onwukwe, Chukwuemeka Ozioma Stanislaus & Diogu, Daniel Uzoma & Mezieobi, Chukwuemeka Sunday & Onungwa, Uchenna, 2026. "Integrating Biophilic Environmental Design and Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies for Sustainable Economic Development: A Systematic Review of Residential Architecture," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 11(2), pages 102-123, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:11:y:2026:i:2:p:102-123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/uploads/vol11-iss2-pg102-123-202602_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/view/integrating-biophilic-environmental-design-and-fourth-industrial-revolution-technologies-for-sustainable-economic-development-a-systematic-review-of-residential-architecture/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abimbola Asojo & Fullah Hazazi, 2025. "Biophilic Design Strategies and Indoor Environmental Quality: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Anderson, John E. & Wulfhorst, Gebhard & Lang, Werner, 2015. "Energy analysis of the built environment—A review and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 149-158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yang & Zhang, Shanhong & Chow, David & Kuckelkorn, Jens M., 2021. "Evaluation and optimization of district energy network performance: Present and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Lee, Junghun & Kim, Jeonggook & Song, Doosam & Kim, Jonghun & Jang, Cheolyong, 2017. "Impact of external insulation and internal thermal density upon energy consumption of buildings in a temperate climate with four distinct seasons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1081-1088.
    3. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura À. & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2022. "Factors and actions for the sustainability of the residential sector. The nexus of energy, materials, space, and time use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Silva, Mafalda C. & Horta, Isabel M. & Leal, Vítor & Oliveira, Vítor, 2017. "A spatially-explicit methodological framework based on neural networks to assess the effect of urban form on energy demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 386-398.
    5. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Lohne, Jardar & Bohne, Rolf André, 2022. "Holistic assessment of carbon abatement strategies in building refurbishment literature — A scoping review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Zhao, Chuyun & Tang, Jinjun & Gao, Wenyuan & Zeng, Yu & Li, Zhitao, 2024. "Many-objective optimization of multi-mode public transportation under carbon emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    7. Olga Beatrice Carcassi & Pietro Minotti & Guillaume Habert & Ingrid Paoletti & Sophie Claude & Francesco Pittau, 2022. "Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Novel Bio-Based Composite for Building Insulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Carine Lausselet & Johana Paola Forero Urrego & Eirik Resch & Helge Brattebø, 2021. "Temporal analysis of the material flows and embodied greenhouse gas emissions of a neighborhood building stock," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 419-434, April.
    9. Eleftheriadis, Stathis & Mumovic, Dejan & Greening, Paul, 2017. "Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 811-825.
    10. Erin M. Hamilton & Rachael Shields, 2025. "If Green Walls Could Talk: Interpreting Building Sustainability Through Atmospheric Cues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Lara Allende, Alejandro & Stephan, André, 2022. "Life cycle embodied, operational and mobility-related energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of a green development in Melbourne, Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Ying Jiang & Linghan Zhang & Junyi Zhang, 2019. "Energy consumption by rural migrant workers and urban residents with a hukou in China: quality-of-life-related factors and built environment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1431-1453, December.
    13. Soares, N. & Martins, A.G. & Carvalho, A.L. & Caldeira, C. & Du, C. & Castanheira, É. & Rodrigues, E. & Oliveira, G. & Pereira, G.I. & Bastos, J. & Ferreira, J.P. & Ribeiro, L.A. & Figueiredo, N.C. & , 2018. "The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-193.
    14. Soares, N. & Bastos, J. & Pereira, L. Dias & Soares, A. & Amaral, A.R. & Asadi, E. & Rodrigues, E. & Lamas, F.B. & Monteiro, H. & Lopes, M.A.R. & Gaspar, A.R., 2017. "A review on current advances in the energy and environmental performance of buildings towards a more sustainable built environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 845-860.
    15. Quan, Steven Jige & Li, Chaosu, 2021. "Urban form and building energy use: A systematic review of measures, mechanisms, and methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat, 2020. "Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    17. Liang, Ruobing & Wang, Peng & Zhou, Chao & Pan, Qiangguang & Riaz, Ahmad & Zhang, Jili, 2020. "Thermal performance study of an active solar building façade with specific PV/T hybrid modules," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Xin, Xin & Liu, Yanfeng & Zhang, Zhihao & Zheng, Huifan & Zhou, Yong, 2025. "A day-ahead operational regulation method for solar district heating systems based on model predictive control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    19. Su, Shu & Ju, Jingyi & Guo, Qiyue & Li, Xiaodong & Zhu, Yimin, 2023. "A temporally dynamic model for regional carbon impact assessment based on city information modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Lopes, Alice do Carmo Precci & Oliveira Filho, Delly & Altoe, Leandra & Carlo, Joyce Correna & Lima, Bruna Bastos, 2016. "Energy efficiency labeling program for buildings in Brazil compared to the United States' and Portugal's," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 207-219.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:11:y:2026:i:2:p:102-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.