IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v10y2025i11p1475-1487.html

Monitoring and Analysis of Classical and Contemporary Factors of Production in Uganda: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wasike David

    (Lecturer at the Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Business and Management, at the International University of East Africa (IUEA).)

Abstract

The Ugandan economy is a combination of traditional agriculture-based production and emerging knowledge-intensive sectors. Production factors, according to classical economic theory, are a function of land, labour, and capital, representing the agrarian and industrial roots of the economy. According to Smith (1776), Ricardo (1817), land remains an important input in production, although labour and physical capital are generally limited by inadequate skills and financing in Uganda. The increase in contemporary production emphasizes entrepreneurship, innovation, and knowledge/technology as the driving forces behind value creation. Drucker (1993) and Romer (1990) advance that the qualitative approach involves policy analysis and a series of in-depth interviews with key informants who can provide evidence for an in-depth critical examination of how productive capacity in Uganda relates to both classical and contemporary factors. In that context, the study adopts an interpretivist-constructivist paradigm in which stakeholders contextualize the meaning of and implement a strategy for production. The findings indicate that classical factors remain foundational but that contemporary factors, mainly entrepreneurship and ICT-driven innovations, serve as critical drivers of economic diversification and structural transformation. However, incomplete access to quality education and technology, and financing opportunities, hinders complete exploitation of such contemporary production factors. These factors lead to a hybrid framework that incorporates both classical and modern factors as likely to constitute a far more comprehensive model against which Ugandan development could be understood. This includes policy implications involving investing in the development of skills and digital infrastructure, along with supporting entrepreneurship programs to harmonize productive capacity between traditional and modern sectors. These measures will enhance economic productivity, decrease unemployment, and strengthen Uganda's competitiveness within regional and global markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Wasike David, 2025. "Monitoring and Analysis of Classical and Contemporary Factors of Production in Uganda: A Qualitative Study," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 10(11), pages 1475-1487, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:11:p:1475-1487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/uploads/vol10-iss11-pg1475-1487-202512_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/view/monitoring-and-analysis-of-classical-and-contemporary-factors-of-production-in-uganda-a-qualitative-study/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    2. David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann, 2022. "The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship," Chapters, in: Cristiano Antonelli (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia on the Economics of Knowledge and Innovation, chapter 39, pages 317-324, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pu Liu & Yingying Shao, 2022. "Innovation and new business formation: the role of innovative large firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 691-720, August.
    2. Stephan Brunow & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Firm Formation and Agglomeration under Monopolistic Competition," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-134/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. Christopher S. Hayter, 2016. "A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 633-656, October.
    4. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    5. Haifeng Qian, 2013. "Diversity Versus Tolerance: The Social Drivers of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2718-2735, October.
    6. Zoltán J. Ács & Mark W. J. L. Sanders, 2015. "Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship in an endogenous growth model," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 10, pages 174-194, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2006. "Innovation and Peripherality: A Comparative Study in Six EU Member Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa06p295, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Yating Li & Martin Kenney & Donald Patton & Abraham Song, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and industry knowledge: does the winning region take all?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 153-172, June.
    9. Mohammad ALAWIN & Alia ABU-AISHEH, 2020. "Number Of Establishments And Economic Growth: Case Of Kuwait, 2001-2014," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 20(2), pages 145-160.
    10. Tsvetkova, Alexandra, 2016. "Do diversity, creativity and localized competition promote endogenous firm formation? Evidence from a high-tech US industry," MPRA Paper 72349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bernardina Algieri & Antonio Aquino & Marianna Succurro, 2013. "Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 382-400, August.
    12. Francesco D’Alessandro & Enrico Santarelli & Marco Vivarelli, 2026. "The KSTE + I approach and the advent of AI technologies: evidence from the European regions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 414-451, February.
    13. Haifeng Qian, 2018. "Knowledge-Based Regional Economic Development: A Synthetic Review of Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship, and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(2), pages 163-176, May.
    14. D'Allesandro, Francesco & Santarelli, Enrico & Vivarelli, Marco, 2024. "The KSTE+I approach and the AI technologies," MERIT Working Papers 2024-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Nair, Mahendhiran & Bennett, Sara E., 2020. "The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1106-1122.
    16. Alvina Sabah Idrees & Saima Sarwar, 2021. "State effectiveness, property rights and entrepreneurial behaviour as determinants of National Innovation," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 392-423, September.
    17. Lawrence Adu Asamoah & Francesco Figari & Andrea Vezzulli, 2021. "Spillover effects of innovation and entrepreneurial activity on income inequality in developing countries: A spatial panel approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1661-1686, October.
    18. Nyström, Kristina, 2015. "Pre- and post-entrepreneurship labor mobility of entrepreneurs and employees in entrepreneurial firms," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 420, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    19. K. Parboteeah & Sascha Walter & Jörn Block, 2015. "When Does Christian Religion Matter for Entrepreneurial Activity? The Contingent Effect of a Country’s Investments into Knowledge," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 447-465, August.
    20. Erik Stam, 2013. "Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: a country-level analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 887-898, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:11:p:1475-1487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.