Author
Listed:
- Ramos Bruna
(COMEGI, Faculdade de Engenharias e Tecnologias Universidade Lusíada, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal ALGORITMI, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal)
- Silva João
(COMEGI, Faculdade de Engenharias e Tecnologias Universidade Lusíada, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal)
- Vila-Chã António
(COMEGI, Faculdade de Engenharias e Tecnologias Universidade Lusíada, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal)
- Azevedo Henrique
(COMEGI, Faculdade de Engenharias e Tecnologias Universidade Lusíada, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal)
- Ramos João
(Center for Innovation and Research in Business Sciences and Information Systems (CIICESI), Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Felgueiras, Portugal)
- Ferreira Ana Cristina
(COMEGI, Faculdade de Engenharias e Tecnologias Universidade Lusíada, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal MEtRICs - Mechanical Engineering and Resource Sustainability Center, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal)
Abstract
Background Supplier selection has emerged as an important activity regarding strategic purchasing with implications for the operational efficiency of both organisations and supply chains. Given the need to evaluate both qualitative and quantitative criteria for different supply alternatives, the decision-making process became more complex. Objectives In the present work, an adapted Analytic Hierarchy Process model is proposed for supplier selection, which is being validated within the context of a textile company. The multi-criteria decision support model was coded in Python and encompasses criteria, cost, quality, delivery time, sustainability, and history. Methods/Approach This model allocates weights to individual suppliers based on the diverse criteria considered. Four alternatives were considered as the chemical fabric dyeing pigment suppliers. Two different scenarios were considered to understand the influence of demand on the supplier selection problem. Results The cost is the most valued criterion in the supplier selection (0.493 for Scenario 1 and 0.426 for Scenario 2). The second most important criterion for regular demand is quality (0.224), whereas, for the increased demand scenario, delivery time (0.301) is the second most impactful criterion. Conclusions The application of the AHP for both tested scenarios resulted in a different priority, highlighting the adjustment capacity of the implemented model to different search parameterisations.
Suggested Citation
Ramos Bruna & Silva João & Vila-Chã António & Azevedo Henrique & Ramos João & Ferreira Ana Cristina, 2024.
"Influence of Demand on Supplier Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study Validation in the Textile Industry,"
Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 178-200.
Handle:
RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:178-200:n:1009
DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2024-0009
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:178-200:n:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.