IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oijscm/v10y2025i1p62-90id3373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Social Sustainability in Automotive Supply Chains: A Framework for Effective Grievance Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Marx
  • Prof. Dr. Wulf-Peter Schmidt

Abstract

Purpose: The automotive industry operates within complex, globalized supply chains characterized by multi-tiered structures and extensive outsourcing, often lacking visibility and accountability for potential human rights violations. Increasingly, regulatory frameworks place explicit obligations on original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), including the requirement to install an effective grievance mechanism along the supply chain. This paper explores how grievance mechanisms can be integrated into automotive supply chain practices to strengthen social sustainability. Methodology: A qualitative approach was employed, and expert interviews were conducted with a diverse group of stakeholders from the automotive industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), regulatory bodies, suppliers, and unions to provide a well-rounded view of grievance mechanisms in supply chains. The data was analyzed by employing Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis with MAXQDA software to systematically code and identify key themes critical for an effective grievance framework. Findings: This paper proposes a practical framework for OEMs to address human rights and ethical issues across global networks. It offers a common structure adaptable to industry players, emphasizing accessibility, confidentiality, and trust. It also recommends combining OEM-specific mechanisms with an industry-wide collaboration platform to standardize processes, share best practices, and enable collective action. The study findings support that grievance mechanisms play a crucial role in social sustainability by providing workers with secure channels to report violations. Integrating grievance data into OEMs’ risk assessments enhances proactive risk mitigation. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This research uniquely addresses the gap in academic literature and practice related to social sustainability in supply chains, particularly in grievance mechanisms. In practice, the automotive industry faces fragmented and inconsistent implementation of grievance mechanisms, with the absence of a standardized framework. This paper fills these gaps by developing a comprehensive, industry-specific grievance mechanism framework that ensures accessibility, consistency, and effectiveness across all supply chain tiers.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Marx & Prof. Dr. Wulf-Peter Schmidt, 2025. "Enhancing Social Sustainability in Automotive Supply Chains: A Framework for Effective Grievance Mechanisms," International Journal of Supply Chain Management, IPRJB, vol. 10(1), pages 62-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oijscm:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:62-90:id:3373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/3373
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kabeer, Naila & Huq, Lopita & Sulaiman, Munshi, 2020. "Paradigm shift or business as usual? Workers' views on multi-stakeholder initiatives in Bangladesh," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102722, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Kabeer, Naila & Huq, Lopita & Sulaiman, Munshi, 2020. "Paradigm shift or business as usual? Workers' views on multi-stakeholder initiatives in Bangladesh," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102938, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Naila Kabeer & Lopita Huq & Munshi Sulaiman, 2020. "Paradigm Shift or Business as Usual? Workers’ Views on Multi‐stakeholder Initiatives in Bangladesh," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1360-1398, September.
    4. John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp, 2024. "Corporate Responses to Community Grievance: Voluntarism and Pathologies of Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 55-68, January.
    5. RUGGIE, John Gerard & REES, Caroline & DAVIS, Rachel, 2021. "Ten Years After: From UN Guiding Principles to Multi-Fiduciary Obligations," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 179-197, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oya, Carlos & Schaefer, Florian, 2021. "The politics of labour relations in global production networks: Collective action, industrial parks, and local conflict in the Ethiopian apparel sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Kelly Gerard, 2023. "Doing aid chains differently: Evaluating the potential of Multi‐Stakeholder Partnerships," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    3. Claire Bright & Karin Buhmann, 2021. "Risk-Based Due Diligence, Climate Change, Human Rights and the Just Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Alysha Kate Shivji, 2025. "Theorizing Effective (Preventative) Remedy: Exploring the Root Cause Dimensions of Human Rights Abuse & Remedy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 223-241, May.
    5. Stephen J. FRENKEL & Elke S. SCHUESSLER, 2021. "From Rana Plaza to COVID‐19: Deficiencies and opportunities for a new labour governance system in garment global supply chains," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(4), pages 591-609, December.
    6. Alysha Kate Shivji, 2024. "Rightsholder-Driven Remedy for Business-Related Human Rights Abuse: Case of the Fair Food Program," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(2), pages 363-382, August.
    7. Laura Boudreau & Sylvain Chassang & Ada González-Torre & Rachel Heath, 2023. "Monitoring Harassment in Organizations," Working Papers 2022-19, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    8. Dina M. Siddiqi, 2020. "Logics of Sedition: Re-signifying Insurgent Labour in Bangladesh’s Garment Factories," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 15(3), pages 371-397, December.
    9. Peter Lund‐Thomsen & Lone Riisgaard & Sukhpal Singh & Shakil Ghori & Neil M. Coe, 2021. "Global Value Chains and Intermediaries in Multi‐stakeholder Initiatives in Pakistan and India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 504-532, May.
    10. Stephen J. Turner, 2021. "Business, Human Rights and the Environment—Using Macro Legal Analysis to Develop a Legal Framework That Coherently Addresses the Root Causes of Corporate Human Rights Violations and Environmental Degr," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-31, November.
    11. Gary GEREFFI & Anne Caroline POSTHUMA & Arianna ROSSI, 2021. "Introduction: Disruptions in global value chains – Continuity or change for labour governance?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(4), pages 501-517, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oijscm:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:62-90:id:3373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSCM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.