IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oijepm/v2y2017i2p18-32id445.html

Influence Of Organization Factors On The Performance Of State Corporations In Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Bruno Mugambi Linyiru

  • Dr. Rutto Peter Ketyenya

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of organization factors on the performance of state corporations in Kenya. Methodology: The study adopted an explanatory research design. The population of the research consists of the 187 state corporations in Kenya as at 2013. The unit of analysis was the state corporation. A purposive sample of 55 commercial state corporations was included in the study. The study used primary data gathered using questionnaires. Results: Results indicated that organization factors are key determinants of firm performance for commercial state corporations in Kenya. Conclusion: Organizational factors were statistically significant in explaining firm performance of commercial state corporations. It can therefore be concluded that for any firm to have better results should manage the organizational factors and nurture conducive environment for all employees to work in.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Bruno Mugambi Linyiru & Dr. Rutto Peter Ketyenya, 2017. "Influence Of Organization Factors On The Performance Of State Corporations In Kenya," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, IPRJB, vol. 2(2), pages 18-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oijepm:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:18-32:id:445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJEPM/article/view/445
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Rauch & Johan Wiklund & G.T. Lumpkin & Michael Frese, 2009. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 761-787, May.
    2. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1034-1062, September.
    3. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    4. Ngoze M. Lwamba & Henry Bwisa & Maurice Sakwa, 2014. "Exploring the Effect of Corporate Entrepreneurship on Financial Performance of Firms: Evidence from Kenya’s Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 352-370, January.
    5. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7-8), pages 1034-1062.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahim, Ahmed & Fattah, Tarek Abdel, 2015. "Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 46-60.
    2. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    3. Rimon Emile & Aiman Ragab & Sandy Kyaw, 2014. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance, Evidence from Egypt," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1865-1877, December.
    4. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    5. Hania Rehman & Muhammad Ramzan & Muhammad Zia Ul Haq & Jinsoo Hwang & Kyoung-Bae Kim, 2021. "Risk Management in Corporate Governance Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Zsolt Lakatos, 2020. "Do larger boards improve shareholder value creation? – Effects of the board size on business performance in Eastern Central Europe," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 42(3), pages 245-279, September.
    7. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, March.
    8. Mohd Rashdan Sallehuddin & Nor Azrin Mohamad Rosli, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Industrial Product and Service Sector in Bursa Malaysia," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(6), pages 87-98.
    9. Detthamrong, Umawadee & Chancharat, Nongnit & Vithessonthi, Chaiporn, 2017. "Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 689-709.
    10. Chaur-Shiuh Young & Liu-Ching Tsai & Pei-Gin Hsieh, 2008. "Voluntary Appointment of Independent Directors in Taiwan: Motives and Consequences," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9-10), pages 1103-1137.
    11. Mejbel Al-Saidi, 2020. "Capital Structure and Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE)," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 1-38, June.
    12. Nguyen, Tuan & Locke, Stuart & Reddy, Krishna, 2014. "A dynamic estimation of governance structures and financial performance for Singaporean companies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-11.
    13. Aziz Jaafar & Lynn Hodgkinson & Mao-Feng Kao, 2019. "Ownership Structure, Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Working Papers 19011, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    14. Linda Loh & Chan Sok-Gee, 2017. "Bank Risk Taking Behaviour in Malaysia: Role of Board and Ownership Structure," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26.
    15. Noor Afza Amran Author_Email:, 2011. "Who Influence Family Company Performance: Founder Of Successor?," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-259, Conference Master Resources.
    16. Ahmad, Sardar & Ullah, Subhan & Akbar, Saeed & Kodwani, Devendra & Brahma, Sanjukta, 2024. "The impact of compliance, board committees and insider CEOs on firm survival during crisis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Abdulrahman F. Alshehri, 2025. "Corporate governance and financial performance of Islamic banks: new international evidence," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 305-319, September.
    18. Beatrice Sarpong-Danquah & Prince Gyimah & Richard Owusu Afriyie & Albert Asiama, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Manufacturing Listed Firms in Ghana," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(3), pages 111-111, August.
    19. Ali Meftah Gerged & Eshani Beddewela & Christopher J. Cowton, 2021. "Is corporate environmental disclosure associated with firm value? A multicountry study of Gulf Cooperation Council firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 185-203, January.
    20. Chowdhury, Biplob & Dungey, Mardi & Pham, Thu Phuong, 2014. "The impact of post-IPO changes in corporate governance mechanisms on firm performance: evidence from young Australian firms," Working Papers 2014-11, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, revised 24 Sep 2014.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oijepm:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:18-32:id:445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJEPM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.