IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcy/issued/cognitivesustainabilityv4y2025i1p4-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive overview of sustainable food packaging material alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Aliz VUK

    (University of Debrecen, Doctoral School of Management and Business, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Bauerné Gáthy Andrea

Abstract

The proliferation of plastic packaging materials and their accumulation as significant amounts of waste raises serious ecological concerns affecting humanity and the natural environment. New alternative packaging materials, including biodegradable and sustainable options, are being explored to address these concerns. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on alternative packaging materials. This study covers biodegradable plastics, sustainable alternatives (Cellulose, Bamboo) and emerging packaging forms (edible packaging, nano-cellulose). SWOT analysis and cross-tabulation have been used to facilitate a comparative assessment of alternatives with plastic. The results show that recycling plastics or the production of bioplastics has not proven to be an effective solution. The environmental impact of sustainable and biodegradable packaging remains unclear. In addition, new materials (edible packaging materials, nano-cellulose fibres) are currently being tested that could reduce environmental impacts and waste. No alternative can fully replace plastic packaging, but new initiatives are promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliz VUK & Bauerné Gáthy Andrea, 2025. "Comprehensive overview of sustainable food packaging material alternatives," Cognitive Sustainability, Cognitive Sustainability Ltd., vol. 4(1), pages 4-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcy:issued:cognitivesustainability:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:4-15
    DOI: 10.55343/CogSust.131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogsust.com/index.php/real/article/view/131
    Download Restriction: -
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55343/CogSust.131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. & Davoudpour, Y. & Saurabh, Chaturbhuj K. & Hossain, Md. S. & Adnan, A. S & Dungani, R. & Paridah, M.T. & Islam Sarker, Md. Z. & Fazita, M.R Nurul & Syakir, M.I & Haafiz, M.K.M., 2016. "A review on nanocellulosic fibres as new material for sustainable packaging: Process and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 823-836.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elsawy, Moataz A. & Kim, Ki-Hyun & Park, Jae-Woo & Deep, Akash, 2017. "Hydrolytic degradation of polylactic acid (PLA) and its composites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1346-1352.
    2. Wan-Ting Li & Yueh-Hsiu Cheng, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Development of the Destination with Tea Public Version Packaging Design by Obtaining Relational Space Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Seyed Rahman Djafari Petroudy & Bruno Chabot & Eric Loranger & Maryam Naebe & Jamileh Shojaeiarani & Samira Gharehkhani & Behzad Ahvazi & Jinguang Hu & Sabu Thomas, 2021. "Recent Advances in Cellulose Nanofibers Preparation through Energy-Efficient Approaches: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-31, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Alternative packaging; food packaging; plastic packaging; Cellulose;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcy:issued:cognitivesustainability:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:4-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maria SZALMANE CSETE (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.CogSust.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.