IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-8p1318-1328.html

The Quiet Diplomats: How Science is Building Bridges in a Broken World

Author

Listed:
  • Hind Mouslim

    (PH-D student at Faculty of Law, Economics and Social Sciences Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco.)

Abstract

In an era defined by a polycrisis of interconnected challenges—from the escalating climate crisis and global health emergencies to deepening geopolitical fissures—traditional diplomatic tools are often insufficient. This article posits that science diplomacy is increasingly recognized not merely as a niche area of foreign policy but as a critical instrument for navigating complexity and fostering global cooperation. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the field, tracing its evolution and dissecting its core conceptual frameworks, notably the tripartite model of ‘science in diplomacy,’ ‘diplomacy for science,’ and ‘science for diplomacy,’ while also engaging with critical theories that illuminate the structural inequalities embedded within these dynamics. The paper examines the operational dynamics through which it functions, from formal intergovernmental agreements and large-scale research infrastructures to the resilient informal networks of scientists that often persist despite political tensions. Through a detailed analysis of illustrative case studies—including CERN as a model for post-conflict reconciliation, the SESAME light source as a beacon of cooperation in the Middle East, the dual-edged lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic, and Morocco’s strategic use of science for regional leadership—the article explores both the potential and the limitations of these approaches in practice. The central thesis argues that while science diplomacy is not a panacea, it offers a vital pathway for building transnational networks grounded in trust and evidence, thereby contributing to more effective global governance. However, its success is continually challenged by the inherent tension between the universalist ethos of science and the competitive realities of national interests, as well as by the often-unseen power asymmetries inherent in global scientific collaboration. The article concludes that building greater capacity, consciously addressing these power dynamics, and navigating this ‘interest paradox’ are essential for leveraging science diplomacy to address the defining global challenges of the 21st century.

Suggested Citation

  • Hind Mouslim, 2025. "The Quiet Diplomats: How Science is Building Bridges in a Broken World," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(8), pages 1318-1328, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:1318-1328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-8/1318-1328.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-quiet-diplomats-how-science-is-building-bridges-in-a-broken-world/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Flink & Ulrich Schreiterer, 2010. "Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(9), pages 665-677, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Geng & Yanrui Wu & Shawn Xiaoguang Chen, 2025. "The displacement effects of US-China political tensions on China’s international and domestic research collaboration: evidence from the “China initiative”," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(11), pages 6191-6226, November.
    2. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    3. Mohammed Mutala Surazu & Dr. Jelica Stefanović-štambuk, 2023. "The Cause of Diplomatic Failure in the Sahel Region and the Rising Coups," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1005-1012, December.
    4. Troy J. Bouffard & Ekaterina Uryupova & Klaus Dodds & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Alec P. Bennett & Dmitry Streletskiy, 2021. "Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Anna-Lena Rüland & Lise H. Andersen & Alan Kai Hassen & Carringtone Kinyanjui & Annika Ralfs & Bruno Iochins Grisci, 2025. "Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4697-4722, August.
    6. Rüffin, Nicolas & Rüland, Anna-Lena, 2022. "Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58((Art. No.), pages 1-12.
    7. Andrei Polejack & Sigi Gruber & Mary S. Wisz, 2021. "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Charlotte Rungius & Tim Flink, 2020. "Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 1-1.
    10. Luís Miguel Lacerda & Manuel Heitor & Jean‐Christophe Mauduit, 2023. "New architectures for bottom‐up science diplomacy: Learning from the evolving Portuguese diaspora in the UK," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 847-857, November.
    11. Elisabeth Epping, 2020. "Lifting the smokescreen of science diplomacy: comparing the political instrumentation of science and innovation centres," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Anna‐Lena Rüland & Nicolas Rüffin, 2024. "A comparison of British and German parliamentary discourses on science diplomacy over time," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 247-259, May.
    13. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Soraya Caro Vargas (Editor) & Carlos Alberto Restrepo Rivillas (Editor), 2022. "Atracción de inversión extranjera directa desde países emergentes : el caso de India y Colombia," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Administración de Empresas, number 58, spring.
    15. Monika Szkarłat, 2020. "Science diplomacy of Poland," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Alexander Raev & Ellen Minkman, 2020. "Emotional policies: Introducing branding as a tool for science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Caroline S Wagner & Denis F, 2023. "China’s use of formal science and technology agreements as a tool of diplomacy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 807-817.
    18. Marguin, Séverine & Haus, Juliane & Heinrich, Anna Juliane & Kahl, Antje & Schendzielorz, Cornelia & Singh, Ajit, 2021. "Positionality Reloaded: Debating the Dimensions of Reflexivity in the Relationship Between Science and Society: An Editorial," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 7-34.
    19. Derya Buyuktanir Karacan, 2021. "Science diplomacy as a foreign policy tool for Turkey and the ramifications of collaboration with the EU," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Simone Turchetti & Roberto Lalli, 2020. "Envisioning a “science diplomacy 2.0”: on data, global challenges, and multi-layered networks," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:1318-1328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.