IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-47043-7053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternatives to Master Plan as a Development Control Tool in Nigeria: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Aminat Temitope Abubakar

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Offa, Kwara State, Nigeria)

  • Akeem Olawole Muritala

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Offa, Kwara State, Nigeria)

  • Owolabi Yakub Popoola

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Offa, Kwara State, Nigeria)

  • Blessing Ezinne Mbamara

    (Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The Master Plan has been the primary development control tool in Nigeria for many decades. However, it often falls short due to its rigid structure, high cost of creation, outdated content, and limited public participation. As urban areas continue to grow rapidly and informally, this plan struggles to keep up with the pace. This paper examines the limitations of Master Plans and evaluates alternative tools for development control such as Strategic Spatial Planning, Structure Plans, Local Development Plans, Development Guidelines, and Participatory Planning. These approaches offer more flexibility, faster implementation, and greater public participation. Case studies from cities like Lagos, Enugu, and Kaduna show how these alternatives can better address issues like informal settlements and infrastructure needs. The study also indicates the importance of public participation in achieving fair and sustainable development. In conclusion, the paper recommends revising planning laws, investing in professional training, improving institutions, and adopting more inclusive, locally informed planning practices. By doing so, Nigeria can move towards a more responsive and effective urban development control system that matches the rapid growth of its cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aminat Temitope Abubakar & Akeem Olawole Muritala & Owolabi Yakub Popoola & Blessing Ezinne Mbamara, 2025. "Alternatives to Master Plan as a Development Control Tool in Nigeria: A Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 7043-7053, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:7043-7053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/7043-7053.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/alternatives-to-master-plan-as-a-development-control-tool-in-nigeria-a-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John F. Forester, 1999. "The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561220, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reusser, Dominik E. & Loukopoulos, Peter & Stauffacher, Michael & Scholz, Roland W., 2008. "Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions – balancing node and place functions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 191-202.
    2. E. Melanie DuPuis & Brian J. Gareau, 2008. "Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1212-1229, December.
    3. Carla Oonk & Judith Gulikers & Martin Mulder, 2016. "Educating collaborative planners: strengthening evidence for the learning potential of multi-stakeholder regional learning environments," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 533-551, October.
    4. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    5. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    6. Primmer, Eeva & Kyllonen, Simo, 2006. "Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(8), pages 838-853, November.
    7. Juval Portugali & Nurit Alfasi, 2008. "An Approach to Planning Discourse Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 251-272, February.
    8. Ana Guzmán Ruiz & Meredith Dobbie & Rebekah Brown, 2017. "Insights and future directions of transdisciplinary practice in the urban water sector," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 251-263, June.
    9. Marleau Donais, Francis & Abi-Zeid, Irène & Waygood, E. Owen D. & Lavoie, Roxane, 2022. "Municipal decision-making for sustainable transportation: Towards improving current practices for street rejuvenation in Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 152-170.
    10. Shivanand Balram & Suzana Dragicevic & Thomas Meredith, 2003. "Achieving Effectiveness in Stakeholder Participation Using the GIS-Based Collaborative Spatial Delphi Methodology," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 365-394.
    11. Lara, Jesus J., 2020. "Problem-Based solutions from the classroom to the Community: Transformative approaches to mitigate the impacts of boom-and-bust in declining urban communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Liz Barry, 2022. "Community science and the design of climate governance," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    14. Dave Valler & Malcolm Tait & Tim Marshall, 2013. "Business and Planning: A Strategic-Relational Approach," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 143-167, May.
    15. George C. Homsy, 2018. "Unlikely pioneers: creative climate change policymaking in smaller U.S. cities," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 121-131, June.
    16. Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Moulaert & Jan Schreurs & Konrad Miciukiewicz, 2014. "Integrative Spatial Quality: A Relational Epistemology of Space and Transdisciplinarity in Urban Design and Planning," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 393-411, August.
    17. Füg, Franz & Ibert, Oliver, 2020. "Assembling social innovations in emergent professional communities. The case of learning region policies in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 541-562.
    18. Crystal Legacy & Ryan van den Nouwelant, 2015. "Negotiating Strategic Planning's Transitional Spaces: The Case of ‘Guerrilla Governance’ in Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 209-226, January.
    19. Rehana Shrestha & Heike Köckler & Johannes Flacke & Javier Martinez & Martin Van Maarseveen, 2017. "Interactive Knowledge Co-Production and Integration for Healthy Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Peter Munthe-Kaas, 2015. "Agonism and co-design of urban spaces," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 218-237, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:7043-7053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.