IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i3sp2118-2138.html

Visual Elements in Digital Technology Platforms and Visualized Communication in Spreading of False Information

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Diala Edwin Lionel

    (Department of Languages and Humanities Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, Owerri)

  • Dr. Uzowuihe Bertha

    (Department of Languages and Humanities Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, Owerri)

Abstract

Digital technology has demonstrated humongous benefits in spreading of information and awareness creation. Digital media platforms are observable facts that have turned out to be pervasive as the presence and use of digital platforms by netizens. Even more puzzling in several discourses is the near absence of the cultural strengthening and self-motivated of existence, particularly in Nigeria. This represents a new boundary of challenge. The use of visual elements in digital technology platforms and visualized communication in spreading of false information in Nigeria should be regulated. Its format is most used in promoting this practice. The major platforms used are WhatsApp, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram. This study utilized Survey design to obtain secondary data in literature and descriptive statistics were adopted using a self-structured questionnaire. The study adopts Technological Determinism theory and Disruptive Technology theory in observation of distinctiveness submissions to better knowledge of netizens behavioural pattern. Findings reveal that that digital technology user’s spread false information to gain attention, although significant confidence is placed on digital media platforms; many netizens hide their real identities. The study found out that false information spread through it creates panic and tension, pseudo identities dictate because sharing personal information violates long-standing culture of social identity secrecy entrenched in customary traditions in many parts of Nigeria. It was also found that emergence and continual spreading of false information need to be dealt with by imbibing societal value re-orientation for digital technology users; building their understanding and educating the masses. Spreading of false information has given rise to insecurity in Nigerian. Several unknown armed groups, tribal mercenaries and religious fundamentalist are proof of banditry and insecurity in Nigeria. Aside explaining themselves with overt and covert cultural distinctions of digital technology users, the study concludes that software engineers in Nigeria require developing modified software and re-categorizing bots accounts, and chat-bots especially into algorithmic template because of the socio-psychological peculiarities of the clime. The paper recommends the potential valuing and strengthening of digital technology platforms in ensuring reduction of spreading of false information in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Diala Edwin Lionel & Dr. Uzowuihe Bertha, 2024. "Visual Elements in Digital Technology Platforms and Visualized Communication in Spreading of False Information," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 2118-2138, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:2118-2138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-3s/2118-2138.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/visual-elements-in-digital-technology-platforms-and-visualized-communication-in-spreading-of-false-information/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow & Chuan Yu, 2019. "Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Media," NBER Working Papers 25500, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Mutz, Diana C., 2001. "Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(1), pages 97-114, March.
    3. Carmi, Elinor & Yates, Simeon J. & Lockley, Eleanor & Pawluczuk, Alicja, 2020. "Data citizenship: Rethinking data literacy in the age of disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22.
    4. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    5. Simon Hegelich, 2020. "Facebook needs to share more with researchers," Nature, Nature, vol. 579(7800), pages 473-473, March.
    6. Getz, Donald & Page, Stephen J., 2016. "Progress and prospects for event tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 593-631.
    7. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Sabrina Bresciani & Martin J. Eppler, 2015. "The Pitfalls of Visual Representations," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    9. J. Yannis Bakos, 1997. "Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(12), pages 1676-1692, December.
    10. Vivek K. Singh & Isha Ghosh & Darshan Sonagara, 2021. "Detecting fake news stories via multimodal analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(1), pages 3-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    2. Michele Cantarella & Nicolo' Fraccaroli & Roberto Volpe, 2019. "Does fake news affect voting behaviour?," Department of Economics 0146, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    3. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business journalism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Matilde Giaccherini & Joanna Kopinska & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2022. "Vax Populi: The Social Costs of Online Vaccine Skepticism," CESifo Working Paper Series 10184, CESifo.
    5. Jost, Peter J. & Pünder, Johanna & Schulze-Lohoff, Isabell, 2020. "Fake news - Does perception matter more than the truth?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Nitin Verma & Kenneth R. Fleischmann & Le Zhou & Bo Xie & Min Kyung Lee & Kate Rich & Kristina Shiroma & Chenyan Jia & Tara Zimmerman, 2022. "Trust in COVID‐19 public health information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(12), pages 1776-1792, December.
    7. Florence Namasinga Selnes, 2024. "Adolescents’ experiences and (re)action towards fake news on social media: perspectives from Norway," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Artem Zakharchenko & Tomáš Peráček & Solomiia Fedushko & Yuriy Syerov & Olha Trach, 2021. "When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Laura Studen & Victor Tiberius, 2020. "Social Media, Quo Vadis? Prospective Development and Implications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Ryan C. Moore & Ross Dahlke & Jeffrey T. Hancock, 2023. "Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1096-1105, July.
    11. Chaudhuri, Neha & Gupta, Gaurav & Bagherzadeh, Mehdi & Daim, Tugrul & Yalcin, Haydar, 2024. "Misinformation on social platforms: A review and research Agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Julia Cagé & Nathan Gallo & Moritz Hengel & Emeric Henry & Yuchen Huang, 2025. "Fact-Checking and Misinformation: Evidence from the Market Leader," CESifo Working Paper Series 12319, CESifo.
    13. Stefano Carattini & Ulrich Matter & Matthias Roesti, 2025. "Lobbying in Disguise," CESifo Working Paper Series 12000, CESifo.
    14. Andrew P. Weiss & Ahmed Alwan & Eric P. Garcia & Antranik T. Kirakosian, 2021. "Toward a Comprehensive Model of Fake News: A New Approach to Examine the Creation and Sharing of False Information," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Giancarlo Ruffo & Alfonso Semeraro, 2022. "FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Christopher Adamo & Jeffrey Carpenter, 2023. "Sentiment and the belief in fake news during the 2020 presidential primaries," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pages 512-547.
    17. Shixiong Wang & Fangfang Su & Lu Ye & Yuan Jing, 2022. "Disinformation: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Yesilada, Muhsin & Lewandowsky, Stephan, 2022. "Systematic review: YouTube recommendations and problematic content," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22.
    19. Stefano Carattini & Anomitro Chatterjee & Todd Cherry, 2024. "Voting and Information: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11599, CESifo.
    20. Xiaochuan Li & Di Xu & Yan Liu & Danping Wu & Yihui Li & Xinxin Deng, 2025. "How does physical distance from the epicenter influence misinformation sharing? The roles of negative affect and social media engagement," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:2118-2138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.