IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbrqaa/v3y2017p61-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zero-Budget Marketing Strategy: The ‘Can Kid’ Social Responsibility Project

Author

Listed:
  • Tugberk Kaya

    (Fellow at Institute for Research in Economic and Fiscal issues)

Abstract

95% of the global warming is due to human activity (Nuccitelli, 2013) where Paris Agreement is signed by more than 170 parties and carbon dioxide emission needs to be reduced by 40 to 70% by 2050 and eliminated by 2100 (World Economic Forum, 2017). Instead of the tendency to stop global warming, carbon dioxide emission hit record high in 2016 (BBC, 2017). Therefore, importance of initiatives to start recycling becomes crucial to make reuse of products which will decrease the carbon dioxide emission accordingly. Starting up a new social enterprise project with zero-budget can seem difficult. As a result of global competition, the tendency for aggressive marketing is expanding, which has resulted in companies increasing their marketing budgets. There is also a common belief that, as the marketing budget increases, the success of the project will increase proportionally. In addition, consumers are now faced with approximately 3,000 marketing messages per day on average (Reed 2011), which makes it even more difficult to grab their attention.This paper is a case study that describes the Zero-Budget Marketing Strategy that was used for creating the ‘Can Kid’ concept. It covers the theoretical framework of Zero-Budget Marketing (Social Enterprise, Cultural adaptation, Integrated Marketing Communications, Public Relations and Social Media) as well as the 36-month practical application period and the related outcomes of the project. The ‘Can Kid’ project achieved country-wide penetration by using an effective marketing and PR strategy. Selection of the appropriate marketing channels and effective use of the Zero-Budget Marketing Strategy increased awareness of the project and confidence in the brand. Social media played a crucial and leading role for both kick-starting the project and ensuring its sustainability. Since its launch in 2014, the well-crafted and trusted brand image has resulted in a number of sponsorship agreements, which has enabled a project infrastructure that is capable of operating in 5 districts, 28 municipalities and 200 villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Tugberk Kaya, 2017. "Zero-Budget Marketing Strategy: The ‘Can Kid’ Social Responsibility Project," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 3, pages 61-77.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:3:y:2017:p:61-77
    DOI: 10.32038/mbrq.2017.03.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/343/mbrq.2017.03.06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/mbrq.2017.03.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    2. Peredo, Ana María & McLean, Murdith, 2006. "Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 56-65, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iza Gigauri & Mirela Panait & Simona Andreea Apostu & Lukman Raimi, 2022. "The Essence of Social Entrepreneurship through a Georgian Lens: Social Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Canestrino, Rossella & Ćwiklicki, Marek & Magliocca, Pierpaolo & Pawełek, Barbara, 2020. "Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 132-143.
    3. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    4. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    5. Päivi Jokela & Maria Elo, 2015. "Developing Innovative Business Models in Social Ventures," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 103-118.
    6. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Inmaculada Buendía-Martínez & Inmaculada Carrasco Monteagudo, 2020. "The Role of CSR on Social Entrepreneurship: An International Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Andries, Petra & Daou, Alain & Verheyden, Laura, 2019. "Innovation as a vehicle for improving socially vulnerable groups’ access to basic provisions: A research note on the development of a questionnaire module," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 281-288.
    9. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    10. Bertrand Jayles & Clément Sire & Ralf H J M Kurvers, 2021. "Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-28, November.
    11. Ribes-Giner, G. & Moya-Clemente, I. & Cervelló-Royo, R. & Perello-Marin, M.R., 2018. "Domestic economic and social conditions empowering female entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-189.
    12. Jalees, Tariq & Tariq, Huma & Zaman, Syed Imran & Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain, 2015. "Social Media in Virtual Marketing," MPRA Paper 69868, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Apr 2015.
    13. Langley, David J. & Hoeve, Maarten C. & Ortt, J. Roland & Pals, Nico & van der Vecht, Bob, 2014. "Patterns of Herding and their Occurrence in an Online Setting," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 16-25.
    14. Ines Küster & Asuncion Hernández, 2012. "Brand impact on purchase intention. An approach in social networks channel," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-9.
    15. repec:sgm:resrep:y:2013:v:2013:i:1:p:43-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Aleksandar Bradic, 2012. "The Role of Social Feedback in Financing of Technology Ventures," Papers 1301.2196, arXiv.org.
    17. Lashgari, Maryam, 2014. "Social Media Technology Deployment in B2B: A Case Study," INDEK Working Paper Series 2014/9, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management.
    18. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 735-761, July.
    19. Xuzhen Zhu & Jinming Ma & Xin Su & Hui Tian & Wei Wang & Shimin Cai, 2019. "Information Spreading on Weighted Multiplex Social Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, November.
    20. Shubhabrata Basu & Anita Sharma, 2014. "Exploring Stewardship as an Antecedent Behavioural Trait of Social Entrepreneurs," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(1), pages 19-33, March.
    21. Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Mihai Cristian Orzan & Irinel Marin, 2017. "Toward a Romanian NPOs Sustainability Model: Determinants of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:3:y:2017:p:61-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.