IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00007/v4y2025i1p31-36d431.html

Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ryan Haley

    (Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, US)

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that many mean-variance and shortfall-based optimal portfolio selection fail to out-perform the Naive (1/n) Portfolio in out-of-sample testing. This paper revisits this line of inquiry by applying the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios to 1100 sector-specific S&P 500 re-sampled data sets from the 2007-2021 time frame. Using April 2020 as the baseline train-test split break point, the Naive Portfolio delivers statistically significantly superior Sharpe Ratios in the test data in ten of the eleven sectors. However, the Sharpe Portfolio delivers statistically significantly superior shortfall values in all eleven sectors in the test data. Using March 2020 and May 2020 as alternative breakpoints gave similar results to the baseline analysis. Interestingly, when the data set was truncated at February 2020 (i.e., before the Covid correction) the Sharpe Portfolio returned statistically significantly better Sharpe Ratios than the Naïve Portfolio in the test data in all but the Energy sector; as in the baseline analysis, the Sharpe Portfolio returned statistically significantly superior shortfall values for all eleven sectors. Thus, the Sharpe Portfolio can deliver acceptable out-of-sample performance, but the conditions for success appear to vary by sector and test data erraticism.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ryan Haley, 2025. "Sector-Level Out-of-Sample Performance of the Naive and Sharpe Portfolios Using a Covid-Correction Breakpoint," Financial Economics Letters, Anser Press, vol. 4(1), pages 31-36, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00007:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:31-36:d:431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/fel/4/1/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/fel/4/1/42
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Ryan Haley & Charles Whiteman, 2008. "Generalized Safety First and a New Twist on Portfolio Performance," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4-6), pages 457-483.
    2. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    3. Hwang, Inchang & Xu, Simon & In, Francis, 2018. "Naive versus optimal diversification: Tail risk and performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 372-388.
    4. Michael Stutzer, 2000. "A Portfolio Performance Index," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 52-61, May.
    5. Platanakis, Emmanouil & Sutcliffe, Charles & Ye, Xiaoxia, 2021. "Horses for courses: Mean-variance for asset allocation and 1/N for stock selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 302-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conlon, Thomas & Cotter, John & Kynigakis, Iason, 2025. "Asset allocation with factor-based covariance matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(1), pages 189-203.
    2. Cirulli, Antonello & Walker, Patrick S., 2025. "Outperforming equal weighting," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. José Luis Miralles‐Quirós & María Mar Miralles‐Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2019. "Diversification benefits of using exchange‐traded funds in compliance to the sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 244-255, January.
    4. Azra Zaimovic & Adna Omanovic & Almira Arnaut-Berilo, 2021. "How Many Stocks Are Sufficient for Equity Portfolio Diversification? A Review of the Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Khaki, Audil & Prasad, Mason & Al-Mohamad, Somar & Bakry, Walid & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "Re-evaluating portfolio diversification and design using cryptocurrencies: Are decentralized cryptocurrencies enough?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad & Chibane, Messaoud, 2023. "Portfolio optimization in the presence of tail correlation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Weihao Han & David Newton & Emmanouil Platanakis & Haoran Wu & Libo Xiao, 2024. "The diversification benefits of cryptocurrency factor portfolios: Are they there?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 469-518, August.
    8. Max Heide & Benjamin R. Auer & Frank Schuhmacher, 2025. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification in Commodity Futures Markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(1), pages 3-22, January.
    9. Chuting Sun & Qi Wu & Xing Yan, 2023. "Dynamic CVaR Portfolio Construction with Attention-Powered Generative Factor Learning," Papers 2301.07318, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    10. Schäfer, Dorothea & Stephan, Andreas & Weser, Henriette, 2023. "Crisis stress for the diversity of financial portfolios — evidence from European households," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 330-347.
    11. Sun, Chuting & Wu, Qi & Yan, Xing, 2024. "Dynamic CVaR portfolio construction with attention-powered generative factor learning," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Platanakis, Emmanouil & Sutcliffe, Charles & Ye, Xiaoxia, 2021. "Horses for courses: Mean-variance for asset allocation and 1/N for stock selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 302-317.
    13. M. Ryan Haley, 2017. "K-fold cross validation performance comparisons of six naive portfolio selection rules: how naive can you be and still have successful out-of-sample portfolio performance?," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 341-353, August.
    14. Huang, Xinyu & Newton, David P. & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Sutcliffe, Charles, 2025. "Single-stage portfolio optimization with automated machine learning for M6," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1450-1460.
    15. José Luis Miralles-Quirós & María Mar Miralles-Quirós, 2021. "Alternative Financial Methods for Improving the Investment in Renewable Energy Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Dorothea Schäfer & Michael Stöckel & Henriette Weser, 2020. "Crisis Impact on the Diversity of Financial Portfolios: Evidence from European Citizens," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1899, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Wang, Chou-Wen & Liu, Kai & Li, Bin & Tan, Ken Seng, 2022. "Portfolio optimization under multivariate affine generalized hyperbolic distributions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 49-66.
    18. M. Ryan Haley, 2018. "A nonparametric quantity-of-quality approach to assessing financial asset return performance," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 343-351, August.
    19. Thomas Conlon & John Cotter & Iason Kynigakis, 2021. "Machine Learning and Factor-Based Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2107.13866, arXiv.org.
    20. Eom, Cheoljun & Kaizoji, Taisei & Livan, Giacomo & Scalas, Enrico, 2021. "Limitations of portfolio diversification through fat tails of the return Distributions: Some empirical evidence," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00007:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:31-36:d:431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.