IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/avo/emipdu/v34y2025i1p231-254.html

Sticky Costs In Relation To Geographical, Sectoral And Pandemic Factors In Smes In Central European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Musil

    (Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic, Faculty of Business and Management)

  • Alena Kocmanova

    (Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic, Faculty of Business and Management)

Abstract

This study investigates the phenomenon of cost stickiness among SMEs in the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia, analyzing the period 2018-2022, pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic. It aims to assess the influence of geographical location, industry sector, and business size on cost stickiness. Data sourced from the Orbis Europe database is subjected to univariate statistical analysis to explore these relationships. Findings indicate significant effects of business size and industry sector on cost stickiness across the observed years. While enterprise size consistently impacts cost stickiness, industry sectors showed variation, with certain sectors demonstrating stable stickiness pre-pandemic and deviation during the pandemic. Post-pandemic, there was an overall increase in cost stickiness, with the pandemic factor proving statistically significant. Geographic location also exhibited a consistent impact on cost stickiness. These insights contribute to understanding cost behavior in SMEs across diverse contexts and offer practical implications for cost management strategies, potentially informing policy adjustments at governmental levels. This research enhances knowledge regarding cost dynamics in SMEs, particularly relevant amidst economic disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Musil & Alena Kocmanova, 2025. "Sticky Costs In Relation To Geographical, Sectoral And Pandemic Factors In Smes In Central European Countries," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 34(1), pages 231-254, june.
    • Handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:231-254
    DOI: 10.17818/EMIP/2025/4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php/clanak/479125
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17818/EMIP/2025/4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    2. Ljubica Milanovic Glavan, 2023. "Process Maturity Of Croatian Companies," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 32(1), pages 261-272, june.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Guenther & Anja Riehl & Richard Rößler, 2014. "Cost stickiness: state of the art of research and implications," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 301-318, February.
    2. Daniel Cohen & Raj Mashruwala & Tzachi Zach, 2010. "The use of advertising activities to meet earnings benchmarks: evidence from monthly data," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 808-832, December.
    3. Chen, Wenrui & Hong, Yun & Liu, Xinghe & Xu, Cheng & Gao, Jun, 2024. "More resources are better? Strategic alliance involvement and cost stickiness," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Nagar, Neerav & Sen, Kaustav, 2016. "Earnings management in India: Managers’ fixation on operating profits," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Namitha, Chakkappanthodiyil & Shijin, Santhakumar, 2016. "Managerial discretion and agency cost in Indian market," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 159-169.
    6. Raffaele Morandi Stagni & Andrea Fosfuri & Juan Santaló, 2021. "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush: Technology search strategies and competition due to import penetration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1516-1544, August.
    7. Chen, Xiao & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Liu, Leo Jiahe, 2025. "Audit implications of major customer diversity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    8. Haonan Wang & Fangjuan Qiu, 2025. "AI adoption and labor cost stickiness: based on natural language and machine learning," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 163-184, June.
    9. Thomas A. Gilliam, 2021. "Detecting Real Activities Manipulation: Beyond Performance Matching," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(4), pages 619-653, December.
    10. Chia-Hsin Chiang & Helen Choy & Yan-Jie Yang & Shu-Ling Yeh, 2025. "Strategic alignment between supply chain partners and cost stickiness of suppliers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 941-999, February.
    11. Vivien Lefebvre, 2024. "Layoffs in SMEs: The Role of Social Proximity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 801-820, April.
    12. Irvine, Paul & Park, Shawn Saeyeul & Yildizhan, Celim, 2013. "Customer-base concentration, profitability and distress across the corporate life cycle," MPRA Paper 53886, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Banker, Rajiv D. & Byzalov, Dmitri & Chen, Lei (Tony), 2013. "Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 111-127.
    14. Karan Gandhi, 2020. "Real earnings management practices for meeting earnings benchmarks: Indian evidence," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(3), pages 265-291, September.
    15. Voshaar, Johannes & Loy, Thomas R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2025. "The impact of lobbying on managerial short-term resource adjustment decisions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    16. Kitching, Karen & Mashruwala, Raj & Pevzner, Mikhail, 2016. "Culture and Cost Stickiness: A Cross-country Study," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 402-417.
    17. Josiane Da Conceição Bitela Da Silva & Tany Ingrid Sagredo Marin & Katia Abbas & Luiz Eduardo Gaio & Carlos Alberto Grespan Bonacim & Rafael Confetti Gatsios, 2024. "Asymmetry in Cost Behavior in Brazilian Hospitals," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Meeok Cho & Jiwon Hyeon & Woo-Jong Lee & Hee-Yeon Sunwoo, 2025. "An empirical analysis of gender differences in asymmetric labor adjustment: evidence from Korea," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1716-1752, June.
    19. Chae, Soo-Joon & Nakano, Makoto & 中野, 誠, 2015. "The Effect Of Classification Shifting On Analyst Forecast Accuracy: Evidence From Japan," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 49(1), pages 25-35, October.
    20. Mohammad Mahdi Rounaghi & Hajer Jarrar & Leo-Paul Dana, 2021. "Implementation of strategic cost management in manufacturing companies: overcoming costs stickiness and increasing corporate sustainability," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:231-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nebojsa Stojcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oedubhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.