IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p212-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Hierarchy-of-Effects (Hoe) Models and Higher Education Advertising in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Azizul Yadi Yaakop*

    (School of Maritime Business and Management, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia)

  • Nomahaza Mahadi

    (International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Zailin Zainal Ariffin

    (Faculty of Defence Studies and Management, National Defence University of Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Siti Sarah Omar

    (University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

The most enduring and controversial models of advertising effectiveness are the Hierarchy-of-effects (HOE) models, which are of particular interest to researchers in marketing and advertising. This paper gives emphasis on the selection of these hierarchical models in the context of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Malaysia. The notion of raising awareness and interest, followed by desire and action is very seductive in its simplicity, and provides a clear focus for Higher Education advertising. In light of the criticisms of these models, this conceptual paper compares and contrasts the more important advertising models and reflects on the relevance of these simple models in relations to the advertising focus in HEIs.The authors conclude that HOE models fail to adequately represent the impact of the advertising process on the complex emotional/rational decision-making that takes place when choosing HEIs. Advertising’s impact on the choice process is far more complex: developing brand desire through brand image is an important purpose of advertising. The authors are also in agreement with the notion of an essential understanding of other marketing areas such as brand identity, meaning and reputation of higher education institutions through a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods to communicate effectively with the stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Azizul Yadi Yaakop* & Nomahaza Mahadi & Zailin Zainal Ariffin & Siti Sarah Omar, 2018. "Review of Hierarchy-of-Effects (Hoe) Models and Higher Education Advertising in Malaysia," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(11), pages 212-219, 11-2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:212-219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr4(11)212-219.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&info=archive&journal=7&month=11-2018&issue=11&volume=4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Tahir Jan & Djihane Ammari, 2016. "Advertising online by educational institutions and students' reaction: a study of Malaysian Universities," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 168-180, July.
    2. Scholten, Marc, 1996. "Lost and found: The information-processing model of advertising effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 97-104, October.
    3. Michael L. Klassen, 2000. "Lots of Fun, Not Much Work, and No Hassles: Marketing Images of Higher Education," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 11-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dare Ojo Omonijo* & Olusola B. Okunlola & Oliver Onyekwere C. Uche & Michael C. Anyaegbunam & Jonathan A. Odukoya & Elizabeth I. Olowookere & Olusola Joshua Olujobi, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Modeling as an Educational Tool for Adolescent Moral Development," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 276-288:4.
    2. Matušínská Kateřina & Stoklasa Michal, 2022. "The appeals and level of involvement influencing purchasing decision," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 234-254, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar SALEM, 2020. "Social Media Marketing In Higher Education Institutions," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 23, pages 191-196, August.
    2. Samuel Natale & Caroline Doran, 2012. "Marketization of Education: An Ethical Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 187-196, January.
    3. Trivedi, Rohit H. & Teichert, Thorsten, 2019. "The effect of ad smiles on consumer attitudes and intentions: Influence of model gender and consumer gender," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 197-205.
    4. Santos, Susana & Gonçalves, Helena Martins, 2021. "The consumer decision journey: A literature review of the foundational models and theories and a future perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Gauzente, Claire, 2010. "The intention to click on sponsored ads—A study of the role of prior knowledge and of consumer profile," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 457-463.
    6. Zuraidah Zainol & Rusliza Yahaya & Juliana Osman & Monizaihasra Mohamed, 2017. "Student Engagement Towards HEIs: Relationship Marketing Perspective," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(10), pages 543-555, October.
    7. Tang, Liang (Rebecca) & Jang, Soocheong (Shawn) & Morrison, Alastair, 2012. "Dual-route communication of destination websites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 38-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:212-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.