IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jaterr/2019p01-17.html

Web-based multi-criteria decision support system in screening and selection of priority projects for inclusion in agency’s annual budget proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Taniegra Sussie Tarrega

    (Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila, Philippines)

Abstract

This paper presents a developed web-based decision support system that implements a multi-criteria decision analysis, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) as modeling tool in screening and selection of agency’s priority projects for inclusion in annual budget proposal. Screening and selection of priority projects for inclusion in the annual budget proposal of the government is a complex decision-making that involves many stakeholders with con- flicting priorities and dynamic preferences, as well as limited technical information. Government decision making becomes more complicated because of the complexities carried by the people involved in the process, and other factors that contribute to balancing of political, technical, and economic considerations. The application of Multi- Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods for decision makers helps them facilitate the systematic treatment of information, inform those involved in the process, and come up with effective decisions in complex circumstances. Development of decision support system that implements MCDA tools such as ANP modeling techniques in screen- ing and selection of priority projects helps manage this complexity and makes decision-making efficient, effective, and transparent. The study used a pre-defined set of criteria identified during the progress of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Taniegra Sussie Tarrega, 2019. "Web-based multi-criteria decision support system in screening and selection of priority projects for inclusion in agency’s annual budget proposal," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 5(1), pages 01-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:jaterr:2019:p:01-17
    DOI: 10.20474/jater-5.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jater5.1.1.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jater-5.1.1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jater-5.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas H.K. Kang & Joon-Ki Hong, 2018. "Detailed analytical methods for simulation of concrete target resistance against F-4D jet impact," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(1), pages 01-08.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty & Daji Ergu, 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1171-1187, November.
    3. Haleem Farman & Huma Javed & Bilal Jan & Jamil Ahmad & Shaukat Ali & Falak Naz Khalil & Murad Khan, 2017. "Analytical network process based optimum cluster head selection in wireless sensor network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Ahmad Najim Noorzad & Takuro Sato, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Fuzzy-Based Handover Decision System for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 3(4), pages 159-168.
    5. Sukanya Cherdchoongam & Vichai Rungreunganun, 2015. "An Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process for Ranking Factors Affecting Thai Natural Rubber Ribbed Smoked Sheets No. 3 (RSS3) Price," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 1(2), pages 42-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghazi M. Magableh & Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi, 2024. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Method for Assessing Crisis Recovery Strategies in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Fernández, Eduardo & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain & Díaz, Raymundo & Molina Morejón, Victor Manuel, 2026. "An outranking relation built on an additive value function preference model: Creating synergy between both paradigms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Kriegel, Johannes & Rissbacher, Clemens & Pölzl, Alois & Tuttle-Weidinger, Linda & Reckwitz, Nanni, 2020. "Levers for integrating social work into primary healthcare networks in Austria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 75-82.
    5. Adam Stecyk, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainable Development in ASEAN: An Integrated Assessment of Education and Health Factors," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 209-220.
    6. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    7. Eduardo Fernandez & Jorge Navarro & Rafael Olmedo, 2018. "Characterization of the Effectiveness of Several Outranking-Based Multi-Criteria Sorting Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1047-1084, July.
    8. Ewa Roszkowska & Marzena Filipowicz-Chomko, 2021. "Measuring Sustainable Development Using an Extended Hellwig Method: A Case Study of Education," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 299-322, January.
    9. Layth A. Alasadi & Afrah A. Alkraidi & Qusay A. Alatiyah, 2018. "Effect of Silica Fume and Polymers on Absorption and Some Mechanical Properties of Concrete Contains Waste Aggregates," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 4(6), pages 233-242.
    10. Krzysztof Dmytrow & Beata Bieszk-Stolorz, 2021. "Comparison of changes in the labour markets of post-communist countries with other EU member states," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(4), pages 741-764, December.
    11. Haddad, Malik & Sanders, David, 2018. "Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 357-370.
    12. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    13. Felipe Costa Araujo & Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti, 2020. "Evaluating the Stability of the Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Regulatory Framework in Brazil," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 143-156, February.
    14. Karatas, Mumtaz & Sulukan, Egemen & Karacan, Ilknur, 2018. "Assessment of Turkey's energy management performance via a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 890-912.
    15. Zoran Ilić & Goran Marinković & Vladimir Bulatović & Anđelko Matić & Vladimir M. Petrović, 2025. "Comprehensive MCDM Approach in the Process of Land Consolidation Project Choice," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    17. Cao, Sheng & Xu, Haicheng & Xu, Yan & Wang, Xiaoshen & Zheng, Yingjie & Li, Yanling, 2023. "Assessment of the integrated benefits of highway infrastructure and analysis of the spatiotemporal variation: Evidence from 29 provinces in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. M. Vulic´ & M. Pavlovic´ & D. Tadic & A. Aleksic & A. Tomovic, 2018. "Ranking of recycling technologies metal components of end of life vehicles by using modified electre," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(4), pages 143-148.
    19. Darko Božanić & Dragan Pamucar & Ibrahim Badi & Duško Tešić, 2023. "A decision support tool for oil spill response strategy selection: application of LBWA and Z MABAC methods," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(1), pages 24-58, March.
    20. Yuangao Chen & Shuo Wang & Jianrong Yao & Yixiao Li & Shuiqing Yang, 2018. "Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1708-1719, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jaterr:2019:p:01-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/10 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.